FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-03-2003, 08:39 AM   #31
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Eden

Quote:
Originally posted by Volker.Doormann
?? Can or nobody can?

Who is it, who knows that nobody can ... ? Waiting is a process in time using dead thoughts of the mind. Rational thinking of the mind using GPS and ancient maps lead not to holy places, because a rational mind has no knowledge about holiness. The holiness must exist in the self in order to recognize the holiness of 'Gan Eden'/'Tilmun'/'Dilmun' beyond all time and history and historic places from death memories in the mind.

Volker
Well now, you were splitting hairs when you asked "who can" and therefore I was forced to say that "nobody can" while I should have said that "no rational mind can" because the non-rational mind (that always existed in us) must find us (the rational mind).

The problem with this is that we cannot pretent to get lost so this will happen because our pretension will still be a rational act and therefore we cannot "get lost," or even "wait" for this to happen (as I suggested earlier). Here again, all our efforts will prevent its happening. It's like Golding said in "the Spire: "[Awakening] is as easy as eating and drinking . . . but we cannot even have one eye asquint towards it."
 
Old 08-03-2003, 10:26 AM   #32
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: On the road to extinction. . .
Posts: 1,485
Default

Doctor X : :
Quote:
So Eden is a moble home . . . a double-wide?
It is written in the book of myths that all those who encounter the garden Eden shall forever cherish its golden memories.

I guess that's why it has become a mobile home. I think it may be more than 5 times square by now,
sophie is offline  
Old 08-03-2003, 05:51 PM   #33
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: American in China
Posts: 620
Default

While I was doing a search for the Pishon and the Gihon river, I found this fundy site that thought that the following scripture (from Ezekiel) actually meant that Eden was turned into a desert. Talk about misinterpretation!

Quote:
And they will say, ‘This desolate land has become like the garden of Eden; and the waste, desolate, and ruined cities are fortified and inhabited.’
conkermaniac is offline  
Old 08-03-2003, 09:14 PM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North Hollywood, CA
Posts: 6,303
Default

Can someone please translate what Volker and Amos are talking about to a human language so I might comprehend it? Thanks.
Arken is offline  
Old 08-03-2003, 09:57 PM   #35
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
Default

Volker listed probable mythic predescessors to Eden.

Amos is giving his beliefs.

--J.D.
Doctor X is offline  
Old 08-04-2003, 02:15 AM   #36
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 478
Default

I just love the conclusions people draw when it comes to discovering religious artefacts...

"We found evidence of a rainforest that used to be in the middle east, therefore it was a paradise, therefore it was eden." Just don't mention that pretty much every landmass going was once a forest at some time or another...

"We found a chariot wheel in the Red Sea, hence Moses must be real" Despite the fact that they find lots of other junk in the seabed too....
NZAmoeba is offline  
Old 08-04-2003, 02:49 AM   #37
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Eden

Quote:
Originally posted by Amos

Well now, you were splitting hairs when you asked "who can"
Volker.Doormann: ... Not to find with the mind."
Amos.". . . but can only be found in the mind."
Volker.Doormann: "And who is it, who can find it in the mind?"
Amos: "Aha, good question. Nobody can ... "

? Sorry. First you call it a good question, and now this should be hair splitting (?).

It seems, that this gymnastic of the mind proves by evidence here, that Eden is invariant to the mind. Isn't it?
Quote:
The problem with this is that we cannot pretent to get lost so this will happen because our pretension will still be a rational act and therefore we cannot "get lost," or even "wait" for this to happen (as I suggested earlier).
I don’t think so. The logic, that claim to know, that ‘we’ know not before waiting, is not a logic. Moreover, it suggest wrongly, that time (‘waiting’) is involved in cognition. But time is a phantom only used in causal energetic processes not to be separated from energy, as electricity is not to be separated from magnetism. Truth is truth; truth is eternal, invariant of time as a seven is always greater as a six. Religions, especially Hinduisms, or Christianity selling this nonsense, one gets effects (‘knowledge’, ‘cognition’) out of nothing, but time. Knowledge and cognition is a result of causality. If one does not listen to the own reality of his imperfection, and perceiving the truth about the falsehood in it, no knowledge will be then. You cannot keep on going (process in time) enslave souls in spiritual darkness (‘for example about the truth about the true meaning of the symbol: ‘The garden of joy’ = ‘gan eden’), and expect, that these slaves are thankful about this imprisonment served by religions. Either they can show light or not; all other is charlatanry.

It is this a classic example of mixing up social power to ‘guide’ groups like wolves, Christians, baboons, nations, etc. - with the absolute individual experience of spirituality as soul in a fleshly body. As I have it written here before, no church and no religion can replace the individual experience of the own soul in a fleshly body.

And to come back to that holy symbol ‘Eden’ = ‘garden of joy’, this individual experience is touching that holy symbol ‘Eden’ = ‘garden of joy’, were two people lay down in peace.

Volker
Volker.Doormann is offline  
Old 08-04-2003, 12:09 PM   #38
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Eden

Quote:
Originally posted by Volker.Doormann
Volker.Doormann: ... Not to find with the mind."
Amos.". . . but can only be found in the mind."
Volker.Doormann: "And who is it, who can find it in the mind?"
Amos: "Aha, good question. Nobody can ... "

? Sorry. First you call it a good question, and now this should be hair splitting (?).


I made it perfectly clear that we cannot find Eden with our mind because our mind is the only thing that separates us from Eden. Eden is known to us because it is ours and all we have to do is crucify our own conscious mind to return to Eden but since we cannot rationally crucify our own mind we cannot get to Eden and so we must employ a mystery religion to do this for us.
 
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:11 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.