![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Downriver Detroit
Posts: 1,961
|
![]()
I'm sure that this has been thoguht of before, but I think I just had an idea! We were tlaking in my Human Biology class the other day about how, during certain times of the month, the Woman's Cervix just closes itself all the way shut tight. Why couldn't we make a pill that did the same thing? Just make it so that the cervix stays closed, and none of the wily littly suckers (sperm) can find their way up the right tube! Am I a genius, or what? Someone prove me wrong here... I know you can.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 110
|
![]()
Um, wouldn't that be really bad when the woman has her period and the sloughed-off uterine lining doesn't have anywhere to go?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: b
Posts: 673
|
![]()
The behaviour of the cervix is controlled by hormones. We would be trading one hormone induced state for another. The question is would such a pill have different side effects or less side effects than the more mundane variety. Unfortunately, anything that stimulates the muscular activity in the uterine/cervix area is likely to cause cramping.
Women are always interested in a new form of birth control. New ideas are always appreciated. Glory |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Beloved Deceased
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Vancouver BC Canada
Posts: 2,704
|
![]()
[b]Women are always interested in a new form of birth control. New ideas are always appreciated.[b]
Refuse to sleep with men who aren't fixed. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: b
Posts: 673
|
![]() Quote:
Glory |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
|
![]()
<strong>
Quote:
Rick Rick |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 3,341
|
![]() Quote:
My second thought was, "what kind of market exists for a contraceptive that induces constant menstrual cramps?" I suspect it would be extremely effective, because not only would sperm be blocked from getting past the cervix, but they also wouldn't be allowed anywhere within 10 feet of the woman taking it. I don't think it would be very popular, though. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 131
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
|
![]()
Doesn't semen remain viable for up to five days in the vagina? Seems to me that the cervix would have to remain shut for a long time.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|