Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-08-2003, 03:09 AM | #41 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 719
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
To me the idea of mind reading is on par with the idea of creating a LAN by just putting a few computers next to each other and just hoping that they will communicate. Forget that they are actually designed to pass data through specific channels...let's just hope one processor can tell what the other processors are doing somehow. Quote:
|
||||
03-08-2003, 03:26 AM | #42 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 719
|
Quote:
Just like in Jen's example, how many times do you think about someone without their calling right after? Would you even remember doing so? Probably not. However if one of those times that person just happened to call, you'd think "wow, I'm psychic" instead of the more appropriate "wow, that was a coincidence." You'd remember that one time as an example of your psychic powers, all the while forgetting the thousands of times you thought about someone who didn't call. As for people who claim to have sensed the troubles of distant loved ones, I think that's a mixture of perhaps coincidence and hindsight. How many times did the person feel slightly "strange" or "ill" while nothing was wrong with family? Would they even remember it later? Maybe after finding out that something was wrong that person re-analyzed their feelings and falsely remembered feeling strange, or mentally turned a small fart into memories of agonizing pain so that they could feel some special psychic connection. I actually think hindsight plays a huge part in most of these cases. |
|
03-08-2003, 04:54 AM | #43 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,956
|
Quote:
Well, I never said quantum physics justifies all sorts of psychic abilities, I only said that it never ruled out the possibilities of the existence of those abilities. And I will continue to be a skeptic in this aspect. |
|
03-08-2003, 05:03 AM | #44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 719
|
But how would it rule them out? Nobody's even postulated how they would physically work, so no existing theory can possibly rule them out (besides the Theory of No Psychic Powers--or TNPP for short). GR doesn't rule them out. Superstring theory doesn't rule them out. Quantum chromodynamics doesn't rule them out. I could probably go on, but I'm sure you get the point.
|
03-08-2003, 07:19 AM | #45 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
A significant number of mothers go around being worried about their children a lot of the time. If nothing bad happens, as it does most of the time, she forgets about the bad feeling. When something bad actually happens, once on a blue moon, as it's bound to, she remembers that she "sensed" this danger and it confirms her belief she has some sixth sense. - Jan ...who rants and raves every day at Secular Blasphemy |
|
03-08-2003, 08:02 AM | #46 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 15
|
If you want to see a theory of how these kinds of abilities could work, try looking up Tom Bearden's (cheniere.org, I think), or KeelyNet. Mad stuff.
Freaky stuff you might like to investigate would include the random number generator anomolies on 9/11. And why the navy didn't use frequencies in the 5-10Hz band for underwater communication. Surely the electro-magnetic signatures of the brain could be read by something? That seems to be a perfectly sane possibility. Given that you can theoretically kill someone by phase-locking onto their brain's EM activity (about 500Mhz), then cancel it out (peak-trough), I don't see why you couldn't read it. Why shouldn't the TV comparison be valid? You can't prove the signal exists until you tune the TV. They pick up EM waves, so do our brains... I would provide links, but it just makes people lazy |
03-08-2003, 09:03 AM | #47 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 719
|
The idea that the human brain can affect a random number generator is pretty silly if you ask me. In experiments I've heard of, experimenters have sat subjects down at a computer and told them to try to make the numbers, say, higher than a given value. Then after a while they look to see what the average is. The stupid part of the experiment is the notion that simply thinking "higher than four" is enough to have your brain interact with complex computer hardware in just the right way as to make it produce results higher than four. How the hell does your brain know what transistors to influence? Where did this innate knowledge of computer processor design come from?
And john, our brains don't pick up EM waves. Our retinas--specially designed cells in specially designed sensory structures--pick up EM waves and convert those into electrical signals. And yes, the EM signatures of the brain can be read by something wrapped around the head or something that immerses the head in an incredibly powerful magnetic field. The problem is that the electrical signals in our brain don't produce radiation. The produce incredibly weak fields that die off as a function of 1/rē. You would need to be fantastically close to even hope to detect them. Furthermore, how would you reconstruct the signal to decode the original thought? How would you know which neuron produced the given field you were detecting? Wouldn't you need knowledge as to how far away the individual was, what his height was, how he was oriented relative to you, etc? Quote:
|
|
03-08-2003, 09:15 AM | #48 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 3,764
|
Quote:
|
|
03-08-2003, 02:01 PM | #49 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Augusta, Georgia, United States
Posts: 1,235
|
Quote:
Jen |
|
03-10-2003, 04:14 AM | #50 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 15
|
Lobstrosity ,
Chill. I did mention that that stuff was only theory: I'm trying to evaluate some physics based on the existence of "5th dimension" EM waves based on Kaluza-Klein theory, but I'm at the point of giving up: they're lossless, space-time independent, faster than light. A little hard to comprehend. Just to clarify, the "phase-lock" theory was that, based on Bentov's work, the body has 5 vibrational patterns, as does the brain, which is at about 488Mhz. You would sample this frequency, run it through a unity-gain amplifier, then retransmit the signal phase-shifted by 180 degrees. Which is a pretty big ask. If you happen to rig one up yourself, tell me what happens |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|