FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-08-2003, 03:09 AM   #41
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 719
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Seraphim
My reply : Correction ... "seeing" the future doesn't need you to travel anywhere.

Take a role of a dice for example - you have 6 possible outcome and the actual outcome is 1 so the chance of you getting the result is simply 1/6. By observing the person who throws the dice (whether he is lefthanded/righthanded, whether he have habit of throwing toward the edge of the table etc) you could increase the chance of possibility of getting such result.

In my "example" however, all this "calculations" was somehow precalculated in a person's subconscious mind to the point that only the result is available and not the actual working process. Thus ... resulting in what appeared to be prediction of the future.
This isn't seeing the future, this is making predictions. This is using psychology or physics to try to figure out what will happen. Some people are better at it than others but in general it doesn't work so well. I was talking about people who actually claim see the future--people who aren't actually present to witness the intial conditions of an event. Also, I think the dice thing is bullshit. The human brain doesn't perform those kinds of calculations. It's not structured that way. Anyone who can do that sort of thing can also multiply 432091903280 by 39012380532 in their heads in a fraction of a second (after all, isn't that the sort of thing they're doing in order to predict the precise forces the die will be subjected to?). Next time you see someone claim to have these powers, ask them to do a "simple" multiplication problem like the one above in their heads. If they can't do it, you know they're full of crap.

Quote:
My reply : I don't think it is that hard to explain ... we have several working models of machines for the past a few decades which "mind reads" all the time and it usually sits in your living room. I was referring to TVs and Radios.
What are you talking about? I'm not talking about communication here, I'm talking about reading minds. How do TVs and radios read minds? I feel like I'm missing something.

Quote:
Thoughts is simply interaction of millions of brain cells which work similar to a computer. Energy flows through the circuit board and the circuit board does what it supposed to do by allowing/disallowing the current to past (ON or OFF status). In similar manner is the brain. The brain access its database - memory where it gathers data, adds it to whatever data its reseptors gives and produce new data. What if another "brain" could detect this flow of information?
Yes, I know what thoughts are. You still haven't explained anything, though. The crux of my argument is based on how another brain would detect this information. First of all, how is the information getting out of your skull? How do the details of your thoughts get transmitted? Second of all, assuming you can answer that, what then receives this transmitted information? Yeah, it's all a great "what if," but it's nothing more than that. What if we're all being controlled by a giant slug on Pluto? Thirdly, why do we still even bother to speak to each other if we have this other ability to communicate? Clearly if it's possible to read minds, why don't we do all our communication that way? Verbal communication is actually detrimental to our survival because it requires the throat to be constructed in such a way as to make choking easier. Why have this needless risk when you could just talk with your mind?

To me the idea of mind reading is on par with the idea of creating a LAN by just putting a few computers next to each other and just hoping that they will communicate. Forget that they are actually designed to pass data through specific channels...let's just hope one processor can tell what the other processors are doing somehow.

Quote:
My reply : Can't say much about telekinesis since I have not come across anyone (in the past 30 years) who claims to have such powers. My sensei (martial art instructor) once said that his master could drop another person simply by point his finger (Jedi technique I guess) but my sensei didn't demonstrate it. Maybe IF I felt the impact of whatever "energy" he used, I could somehow make a logical assumption of it.

Which 5 people you are talking about?
I just made up a number. I've heard a few people in the past claim to have telekinesis. Most will use their "minds" to move needles across the table or bend spoons. Sadly people like James Randi can demonstrate how this is all accomplished by sleight of hand, thin pieces of string, or some other deception.
Lobstrosity is offline  
Old 03-08-2003, 03:26 AM   #42
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 719
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by JenniferD
So the odds of thinking about someone and having them call you are not as amazing as they seem. We just don't notice when we think about someone and they don't call. I learned that one from a book called How To Think About Weird Things. That is the book that officially turned me into a skeptic.
Exactly, this is something believers in psychic abilities don't realize. It's human nature to notice and remember that which is bizarre, strange, or coincidental. Similarly, we very quickly forget about things that are ordinary, expected, or understandable. If we didn't our minds would be full of all kinds of junk. Think how many "events" happen to us each and every day. How many of those are too weird explain? I will hear people tell me that for them proof of the existence of psychic abilities comes from the two or three "psychic" experiences they've had in their life time (or even on the two or thre "psychic" experiences they've heard other people describe having). But here's the key: how strange is it to think that one might experience two or three odd coincidences in their lifetime? The Gaussian distribution of random events tells us that ever so rarely something will randomly happen that's quite unexpected and strange. You might flip a coin 100 times and get heads. You might be thinking about someone right before he calls. These random events do have a finite probability of happening and over the course of your lifetime you're bound to encounter something like this probabilistically speaking. At the end of the day all you'll remember is that one weird thing and not the countless number of mundane things that have comprised the rest of your past.

Just like in Jen's example, how many times do you think about someone without their calling right after? Would you even remember doing so? Probably not. However if one of those times that person just happened to call, you'd think "wow, I'm psychic" instead of the more appropriate "wow, that was a coincidence." You'd remember that one time as an example of your psychic powers, all the while forgetting the thousands of times you thought about someone who didn't call.

As for people who claim to have sensed the troubles of distant loved ones, I think that's a mixture of perhaps coincidence and hindsight. How many times did the person feel slightly "strange" or "ill" while nothing was wrong with family? Would they even remember it later? Maybe after finding out that something was wrong that person re-analyzed their feelings and falsely remembered feeling strange, or mentally turned a small fart into memories of agonizing pain so that they could feel some special psychic connection. I actually think hindsight plays a huge part in most of these cases.
Lobstrosity is offline  
Old 03-08-2003, 04:54 AM   #43
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,956
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Lobstrosity
Wait, could you be a little bit more detailed? I'm not really sure what you're even talking about, though I suspect maybe you're referring to the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Quantum physics isn't some new mystical thing that suddenly justifies all sorts of weird events in life.

Well, I never said quantum physics justifies all sorts of psychic abilities, I only said that it never ruled out the possibilities of the existence of those abilities. And I will continue to be a skeptic in this aspect.
Answerer is offline  
Old 03-08-2003, 05:03 AM   #44
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 719
Default

But how would it rule them out? Nobody's even postulated how they would physically work, so no existing theory can possibly rule them out (besides the Theory of No Psychic Powers--or TNPP for short). GR doesn't rule them out. Superstring theory doesn't rule them out. Quantum chromodynamics doesn't rule them out. I could probably go on, but I'm sure you get the point.
Lobstrosity is offline  
Old 03-08-2003, 07:19 AM   #45
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 70
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Seraphim
My reply : Oh yeah ... you reminded me of a very interesting subject. There was a several cases where a mother could "sense" when her children is in danger or had accidents. She usually have this odd feeling (like she ate too much chilli and its reacting inside her stomach, at least that what I descripted from what I heard) and knows that something happened to her child. What you think of that?
Not at all very hard to explain, and it's basically what we should expect.

A significant number of mothers go around being worried about their children a lot of the time. If nothing bad happens, as it does most of the time, she forgets about the bad feeling. When something bad actually happens, once on a blue moon, as it's bound to, she remembers that she "sensed" this danger and it confirms her belief she has some sixth sense.


- Jan

...who rants and raves every day at Secular Blasphemy
Jan Haugland is offline  
Old 03-08-2003, 08:02 AM   #46
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 15
Default

If you want to see a theory of how these kinds of abilities could work, try looking up Tom Bearden's (cheniere.org, I think), or KeelyNet. Mad stuff.

Freaky stuff you might like to investigate would include the random number generator anomolies on 9/11. And why the navy didn't use frequencies in the 5-10Hz band for underwater communication.

Surely the electro-magnetic signatures of the brain could be read by something? That seems to be a perfectly sane possibility. Given that you can theoretically kill someone by phase-locking onto their brain's EM activity (about 500Mhz), then cancel it out (peak-trough), I don't see why you couldn't read it.

Why shouldn't the TV comparison be valid? You can't prove the signal exists until you tune the TV. They pick up EM waves, so do our brains...

I would provide links, but it just makes people lazy
john_e is offline  
Old 03-08-2003, 09:03 AM   #47
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 719
Default

The idea that the human brain can affect a random number generator is pretty silly if you ask me. In experiments I've heard of, experimenters have sat subjects down at a computer and told them to try to make the numbers, say, higher than a given value. Then after a while they look to see what the average is. The stupid part of the experiment is the notion that simply thinking "higher than four" is enough to have your brain interact with complex computer hardware in just the right way as to make it produce results higher than four. How the hell does your brain know what transistors to influence? Where did this innate knowledge of computer processor design come from?

And john, our brains don't pick up EM waves. Our retinas--specially designed cells in specially designed sensory structures--pick up EM waves and convert those into electrical signals. And yes, the EM signatures of the brain can be read by something wrapped around the head or something that immerses the head in an incredibly powerful magnetic field. The problem is that the electrical signals in our brain don't produce radiation. The produce incredibly weak fields that die off as a function of 1/rē. You would need to be fantastically close to even hope to detect them. Furthermore, how would you reconstruct the signal to decode the original thought? How would you know which neuron produced the given field you were detecting? Wouldn't you need knowledge as to how far away the individual was, what his height was, how he was oriented relative to you, etc?

Quote:
Given that you can theoretically kill someone by phase-locking onto their brain's EM activity (about 500Mhz), then cancel it out (peak-trough), I don't see why you couldn't read it.
All I can say to this is bullshit. I'm not even sure what you mean. How are you giving a frequency for the brain's EM activity and what exactly would you cancel it with? What are we talking here...hooking up a + and - lead to some guy's head and then driving a oscillating voltage through there at a specific frequency?
Lobstrosity is offline  
Old 03-08-2003, 09:15 AM   #48
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 3,764
Default

Quote:
posted by seraphim:
My reply : I don't think it is that hard to explain ... we have several working models of machines for the past a few decades which "mind reads" all the time and it usually sits in your living room. I was referring to TVs and Radios.
Please explain how a TV or radio reads your mind. It sounds all too familiar to me, but not anything to do with psychic ability. Does the TV or radio say things to you?
Mad Kally is offline  
Old 03-08-2003, 02:01 PM   #49
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Augusta, Georgia, United States
Posts: 1,235
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Seraphim
By JenniferD

I think it's totally bogus. I was raised atheist, but my mom had (has) a powerful belief in the super-natural, and she is convinced that she has a psychic connection with me and with her sisters. It took me a lot of time with critical thinking to work out my issues with this. The antecdotal evidence was everywhere.

My reply : Oh yeah ... you reminded me of a very interesting subject. There was a several cases where a mother could "sense" when her children is in danger or had accidents. She usually have this odd feeling (like she ate too much chilli and its reacting inside her stomach, at least that what I descripted from what I heard) and knows that something happened to her child. What you think of that?
I think that is just more anecdotal evidence. Until the results can be duplicated in a test situation, under the scientific method, I still say that it is bogus. I can give you HUNDREDS of examples of times where my mom and I have "read each others' minds" but it is simply coincidence. The rest of my post, which you snipped off, explains a couple of the reasons I was able to reconcile my doubts on that issue.

Jen
Ensign Steve is offline  
Old 03-10-2003, 04:14 AM   #50
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 15
Default

Lobstrosity ,
Chill. I did mention that that stuff was only theory: I'm trying to evaluate some physics based on the existence of "5th dimension" EM waves based on Kaluza-Klein theory, but I'm at the point of giving up: they're lossless, space-time independent, faster than light. A little hard to comprehend.

Just to clarify, the "phase-lock" theory was that, based on Bentov's work, the body has 5 vibrational patterns, as does the brain, which is at about 488Mhz. You would sample this frequency, run it through a unity-gain amplifier, then retransmit the signal phase-shifted by 180 degrees. Which is a pretty big ask. If you happen to rig one up yourself, tell me what happens
john_e is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:44 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.