![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
View Poll Results: Do you code the HTML manually or do you use a WYSIWYG editor? | |||
I always code the HTML manually |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
47 | 65.28% |
I always use a WYSIWYG editor |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 1.39% |
I use a WYSIWYG editor and then manually correct its HTML output |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 20.83% |
I code the HTML manually for some sites, and use a WYSIWYG editor for others |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 12.50% |
Voters: 72. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#31 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Hiding from Julian ;)
Posts: 5,368
|
![]() Quote:
...kidding, of course. And nothing wrong with using vi, if that's what you like... But really... vi is a *HORRIBLE* editor. It's bad bad bad. I've taught myself to use it several times; it never sticks. Just too alien. I *know* how powerful everyone says it is, but I don't care. I'm no UNIX newbie, I've compiled kernels, made scripts in bash and awk and perl, understand how regex works, but vi I cannot and WILL NOT grok. And why does it fill the background of empty lines with ':'s? What if I wanted to type in a line of ':'s, how would I know when I had? My typical vi session: Quote:
My editor of choice? pico. Small, simple, and does what I need without obfusication or garbage. ....whew. I feel much better now. Thank you for reading(or tolerating, at least) my rant. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: A soulless suburb of Chicago
Posts: 1,000
|
![]()
Dreamweaver + PHP by hand
I am a professional web designer. It would take me ages to get everything done if I hand coded all the HTML. I still hand code some of the HTML that PHP will generate, and all of the PHP code itself. Those are the intellectually stimulating parts anyway. I prefer to let the editor handle the mundane parts like creating tables, sizing fonts, etc. Besides, the sites I work on have rather complex design layouts, and I would tear out my hair trying to position all that stuff by hand. Of course, it is inevitable that I have to go back into the code and futz around with the one or two tags that DW just won't place properly. Dreamweaver also has a built in FTP client that is a must for me. |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 712
|
![]()
I hand code using HTML-Kit by http://www.chami.com.
I do mainly ASP, with a fair amount of HTML and less JScript. I've built myself a pretty extensive libray of common functions, to the point where most scripts are just a couple of SSIs, some basic logic and a bit of presentation. As I get better I'm moving most of the business logic into SQL Server, as it handles it better. HR |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Raleigh, NC
Posts: 959
|
![]()
About VI vs. Pico: I've been using vi for about ten years now, and I stopped using Pico entirely. Unfortunately for Pico, it has some bad habits like inserting carriage returns in code by default, and I can't be bothered to write a .rc file to fix this behaviour.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#35 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Hiding from Julian ;)
Posts: 5,368
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Boxing ring of HaShem, Jesus and Allah
Posts: 1,945
|
![]()
The time invested in learning how to use vi is richly rewarded.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#37 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lule�, Sweden.
Posts: 354
|
![]() Quote:
Hey! There's NOTHING wrong with assembler programming. Nothing! ![]() (Is not that much of an oldie either, but had the opportunity to use 6504 (c64), z80 (MSX), 680x0 ('miggy), MIPS and a quick glance at PPC (I never got as far as getting a PPC-card for the 'miggy but....) And using IDEs to auto-generate code is ... disgusting.. heretical... ![]() As for the HTML part, the few times I have ebgaged in site building... Handcoding. Vi (although, to be really, REALLY geeky, I guess I should use ed :P). Running the code through W3Cs validators. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 298
|
![]()
EditPad Lite.
I don't bother writing that much HTML nowadays since I find it very dull. Instead I'll create a set of templates an use PERL to do all the work for me. PERL's great. |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Hiding from Julian ;)
Posts: 5,368
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 699
|
![]()
By hand, with EditPlus.
I tend to start off by making a template, and then using ssi includes or something similar in all the other pages that refer to that template. Then, if I ever want to change something to the layout of the site, I just go to the template files, rather than finding and editing every .*htm* file on the site. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|