FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-06-2003, 06:27 AM   #71
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 3,680
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Doctor X
What . . . she posted evidence?

Hinduwoman . . . so . . . slavegirls are legal . . . hmmmmm?

--J.D.
no...I've aggressively dealt with Hinduwomen in the past. I have a good idea about how she "sets up her post". If you want you can do a search and check out Hinduwoman's previous pattern /history of posts.
River is offline  
Old 08-06-2003, 06:29 AM   #72
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 3,680
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by conkermaniac
Would you people please stop debating issues that you don't know anything about? This "Eve" was not the first woman ever. Please, stick to (what appears to be) your expertise: religion. :banghead:
I was actually discussing semantics....well, I know who " Mitochondrial Eve" of S. Africa is..
River is offline  
Old 08-06-2003, 06:31 AM   #73
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by conkermaniac
That's from the Christianity Apologetics & Research Ministry...

Darn, and that was a pretty fine irony detector you just broke...
What difference does that make? It still has verses directly from the Quran and Hadith about the abuse of women in Islam.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 08-06-2003, 11:25 AM   #74
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Contingent upon observation
Posts: 518
Default

One unfortunate consequnce of damning a concept based on it's history is that you have found a new enemy in yourself in mankind.
Xeno is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 08:51 AM   #75
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: England
Posts: 2,608
Default

I find it comical that one person here can advocate oppression within a society yet also seeks to denounce oppression within others.
meritocrat is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 10:07 AM   #76
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SW 31 52 24W4
Posts: 1,508
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by River
Muslims knew that the Earth was round before other peoples.
The Greeks knew the earth was round centuries before Muhammed was born, so obviously this is not true.

The primary contibution of Islam to science was that while the Christian Churches were destroying Roman and Greek texts because they were "Paegan", Islamic leaders maintained the libraries and encouraged scholarship. Not all Islamic leaders did this though. Some destroyed these works for being either superfluous (i.e. they were consistant with the Quran) or heretical (i.e. they were inconsistent with the Quran).

Advances in the Islamic Era in areas such as algebra and optics, however, were not "Islamic contibutions to science". At least not any more so than the discoveries of Newton were "Christian contibutions to science".

<edit: Sorry, I thought this was a one page thread. This was already addressed on page 2. Just blame it on my zeal to get to 500 posts>
Silent Acorns is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 08:28 PM   #77
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: India
Posts: 6,977
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by River
no...I've aggressively dealt with Hinduwomen in the past. I have a good idea about how she "sets up her post". If you want you can do a search and check out Hinduwoman's previous pattern /history of posts.
Rivers, your idea of aggressively answering me is to post that Muhammad is predicted in vedas. My pattern is to show he is not. I suppose compared with the usual answers given by Muslims that is sweet of you really, but it does not tackle the essential problem.

If the Koran had become just another book, no one would havbe bothered. But the problem is there are people who take all the verses literally and set out enthusiastically to fulfill them. The morals of Koran are rooted in 7th century tribal culture; it is not suitable for building a rational equal society.

Some little titbits to think about:
The Bali bomber smiled even after hearing his death sentence. He was thinking of the joys of neverending drink and sex that will be his now --- and that is the danger of literal Islam.
Did you know that in so called civilized Austria a muslim girl who converted to Christianity has been sentenced to death by her own parents and she has run away to Germany for refuge? http://washingtontimes.com/upi-break...4948-5617r.htm

http://www.web.mid-day.com/news/worl...pril/50094.htm
Quote:
Lashkar-e-Toiba chief Hafiz Saeed has said jehad against India is paramount as the country is a ''threat'' to world peace
…''Jehad is prescribed in the Quran. Muslims are required to take up arms against the oppressor.... suicide missions are in accordance with Islam and are the best form of jehad,'' saeed said.
It is no use saying they are not real Muslims; they are here and we have to deal with them.

Islam as it is today do not allow any ignoring or reinterpretation and builds up a feeling of persecution anywhere Muslims are not in control
http://www.secularindia.com/mobilisi...an_muslims.htm
Quote:
In the Muslim communities the demand for reform is often interpreted as an attempt to destroy Muslim identity. Any attempt to suggest reforms is treated with suspicion and hostility. Muslims have a suspicion that by introducing reforms in marriage and divorce, they would lose their identity and it would eventually amount to 'Hinduisation' of their social system. Since law is an integral part of Islam, any legislative change would be a violation of belief and faith. It is unfortunate that every question of social reform is viewed from religious point of view. For example, English education was debarred earlier as if it had something to do with Islam. It may be noted that even Sir Sayyed was criticised as Kafir-infidel by fundamentalist Muslim leaders. No wonder Hamid Dalwai and other Muslim Satyashodhaks are labelled as Munafiques (heretics). Opposition to purdah was viewed not from the humanitarian point of view but from religious angle. The validity or non-validity of law is discussed and with reference to Islam rather than to human rights. Against this background there are various myths prevalent among Muslims and non-Muslims about each other and about themselves.
Muslim organizations in India last year demanded that age of marriage for Muslim girls be lowered to 12, if not younger. Quiet a few Muslims protested, unfortunately they were more or less apostates. The moderate Muslims who would like to be both modern and keep their faith are in a quandary. If they protest the orthodox simply ask if they think Muhammad who consummated his marriage with Ayesha when she was nine, did wrong. If you admit the Prophet did wrong, then the whole fabric collapses. So they keep shut.
Islamic communities that are poor and backwards are persuaded by their leaders that they are suffering because they are not practising real Islam. So they try to return to fundamentals which compound the problem.
hinduwoman is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 12:41 AM   #78
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: europe
Posts: 618
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by hinduwoman
Rivers, your idea of aggressively answering me is to post that Muhammad is predicted in vedas. My pattern is to show he is not. I suppose compared with the usual answers given by Muslims that is sweet of you really, but it does not tackle the essential problem.

If the Koran had become just another book, no one would havbe bothered. But the problem is there are people who take all the verses literally and set out enthusiastically to fulfill them. The morals of Koran are rooted in 7th century tribal culture; it is not suitable for building a rational equal society.

Some little titbits to think about:
The Bali bomber smiled even after hearing his death sentence. He was thinking of the joys of neverending drink and sex that will be his now --- and that is the danger of literal Islam.
Did you know that in so called civilized Austria a muslim girl who converted to Christianity has been sentenced to death by her own parents and she has run away to Germany for refuge? http://washingtontimes.com/upi-break...4948-5617r.htm

http://www.web.mid-day.com/news/worl...pril/50094.htm

It is no use saying they are not real Muslims; they are here and we have to deal with them.

Islam as it is today do not allow any ignoring or reinterpretation and builds up a feeling of persecution anywhere Muslims are not in control
http://www.secularindia.com/mobilisi...an_muslims.htm

Muslim organizations in India last year demanded that age of marriage for Muslim girls be lowered to 12, if not younger. Quiet a few Muslims protested, unfortunately they were more or less apostates. The moderate Muslims who would like to be both modern and keep their faith are in a quandary. If they protest the orthodox simply ask if they think Muhammad who consummated his marriage with Ayesha when she was nine, did wrong. If you admit the Prophet did wrong, then the whole fabric collapses. So they keep shut.
Islamic communities that are poor and backwards are persuaded by their leaders that they are suffering because they are not practising real Islam. So they try to return to fundamentals which compound the problem.
Which branch of Hinduism you think is suited for building a rational equal society?

Which Cast would rule?
queser is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 01:23 AM   #79
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: India
Posts: 6,977
Default

Queser are you now aggressively taking up cudgels on behalf of Rivers? or was it genuine curiosity?

The carvakas/lokayata branch would do admirably for building up a rational society since they were materialists and sceptics, a la iidb board.
Hinduism does not only have to be about caste. Castes are just functional divisions of society that got mixed up with religion. So the caste that got ahead would rule depending on what kind of society we create.
hinduwoman is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 06:34 AM   #80
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: europe
Posts: 618
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by hinduwoman
Queser are you now aggressively taking up cudgels on behalf of Rivers? or was it genuine curiosity?

The carvakas/lokayata branch would do admirably for building up a rational society since they were materialists and sceptics, a la iidb board.
Hinduism does not only have to be about caste. Castes are just functional divisions of society that got mixed up with religion. So the caste that got ahead would rule depending on what kind of society we create.
I am curious, since I have been to India and found that most Hindus dont have a clue why they do what they do.

Also found that they say there are 36000 gods and they even have a rat temple and monkey gods.

Also I have noted that many socalled "untouchables" the lowest caste females really work under horrid conditions and they have no way of getting out of that position since the Hindu way says castes dont mix.

Aslo I met a few women( muslim and Hindu ) there who have had abortions once they discovered they were pregnant with female. They say its because it is very expensive to marry off your daughters , so they rather kill the unborn girls.

In my questions there I discoverd that women paying for the husband is age old Hindu tradition that now also some of the Muslims follow.

What can you tell me about this?



I am just curious what type of Hindu are You?
queser is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:11 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.