Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-06-2003, 06:27 AM | #71 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 3,680
|
Quote:
|
|
08-06-2003, 06:29 AM | #72 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 3,680
|
Quote:
|
|
08-06-2003, 06:31 AM | #73 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
|
Quote:
|
|
08-06-2003, 11:25 AM | #74 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Contingent upon observation
Posts: 518
|
One unfortunate consequnce of damning a concept based on it's history is that you have found a new enemy in yourself in mankind.
|
08-07-2003, 08:51 AM | #75 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: England
Posts: 2,608
|
I find it comical that one person here can advocate oppression within a society yet also seeks to denounce oppression within others.
|
08-07-2003, 10:07 AM | #76 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SW 31 52 24W4
Posts: 1,508
|
Quote:
The primary contibution of Islam to science was that while the Christian Churches were destroying Roman and Greek texts because they were "Paegan", Islamic leaders maintained the libraries and encouraged scholarship. Not all Islamic leaders did this though. Some destroyed these works for being either superfluous (i.e. they were consistant with the Quran) or heretical (i.e. they were inconsistent with the Quran). Advances in the Islamic Era in areas such as algebra and optics, however, were not "Islamic contibutions to science". At least not any more so than the discoveries of Newton were "Christian contibutions to science". <edit: Sorry, I thought this was a one page thread. This was already addressed on page 2. Just blame it on my zeal to get to 500 posts> |
|
08-09-2003, 08:28 PM | #77 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: India
Posts: 6,977
|
Quote:
If the Koran had become just another book, no one would havbe bothered. But the problem is there are people who take all the verses literally and set out enthusiastically to fulfill them. The morals of Koran are rooted in 7th century tribal culture; it is not suitable for building a rational equal society. Some little titbits to think about: The Bali bomber smiled even after hearing his death sentence. He was thinking of the joys of neverending drink and sex that will be his now --- and that is the danger of literal Islam. Did you know that in so called civilized Austria a muslim girl who converted to Christianity has been sentenced to death by her own parents and she has run away to Germany for refuge? http://washingtontimes.com/upi-break...4948-5617r.htm http://www.web.mid-day.com/news/worl...pril/50094.htm Quote:
Islam as it is today do not allow any ignoring or reinterpretation and builds up a feeling of persecution anywhere Muslims are not in control http://www.secularindia.com/mobilisi...an_muslims.htm Quote:
Islamic communities that are poor and backwards are persuaded by their leaders that they are suffering because they are not practising real Islam. So they try to return to fundamentals which compound the problem. |
|||
08-11-2003, 12:41 AM | #78 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: europe
Posts: 618
|
Quote:
Which Cast would rule? |
|
08-11-2003, 01:23 AM | #79 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: India
Posts: 6,977
|
Queser are you now aggressively taking up cudgels on behalf of Rivers? or was it genuine curiosity?
The carvakas/lokayata branch would do admirably for building up a rational society since they were materialists and sceptics, a la iidb board. Hinduism does not only have to be about caste. Castes are just functional divisions of society that got mixed up with religion. So the caste that got ahead would rule depending on what kind of society we create. |
08-11-2003, 06:34 AM | #80 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: europe
Posts: 618
|
Quote:
Also found that they say there are 36000 gods and they even have a rat temple and monkey gods. Also I have noted that many socalled "untouchables" the lowest caste females really work under horrid conditions and they have no way of getting out of that position since the Hindu way says castes dont mix. Aslo I met a few women( muslim and Hindu ) there who have had abortions once they discovered they were pregnant with female. They say its because it is very expensive to marry off your daughters , so they rather kill the unborn girls. In my questions there I discoverd that women paying for the husband is age old Hindu tradition that now also some of the Muslims follow. What can you tell me about this? I am just curious what type of Hindu are You? |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|