Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-08-2002, 03:53 AM | #11 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ill
Posts: 6,577
|
Quote:
So being freaked out is the same as blind indifference?! I am not familiar with this use of language! love Helen |
|
02-08-2002, 04:07 AM | #12 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
Posts: 5,814
|
Quote:
|
|
02-08-2002, 04:11 AM | #13 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ill
Posts: 6,577
|
Quote:
|
|
02-08-2002, 04:13 AM | #14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ill
Posts: 6,577
|
p.s. original sin???
|
02-08-2002, 04:15 AM | #15 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
Posts: 5,814
|
Quote:
|
|
02-08-2002, 04:34 AM | #16 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ill
Posts: 6,577
|
Quote:
Although I would say that there are things I'd rather not have children know until they were ready to handle them. And I wouldn't force certain kinds of knowledge on people. For example, I doubt most people at my church would want to go to a UU course and that's just fine with me...it's their choice. love Helen |
|
02-08-2002, 04:40 AM | #17 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
Posts: 5,814
|
all i ask is that if u seek knowledge u should be able to find it, and if you don't want to know something, fine, that's your problem.
|
02-08-2002, 05:17 AM | #18 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ill
Posts: 6,577
|
Quote:
Don't you think 'problem' is a little judgemental? Am I wrong not to want to know about what's on all the sites I get solicited to visit, in junk e-mail? I am just not interested, that's all. love Helen |
|
02-08-2002, 05:26 AM | #19 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Augusta, Maine, USA
Posts: 2,046
|
Quote:
ME TOO! |
|
02-08-2002, 06:02 AM | #20 | |||||||||
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: a place where i can list whatever location i want
Posts: 4,871
|
OK, time for a more substantial reply...
Quote:
Question is: how does this eccumanical, syncretist god view people who don't believe in it? If it's so nice as to recognize all religions, practiced sincerely, as a search for it, what about people who view the multitude of religions and the strife caused by there differences, as proof that no god exists that wants people to worship it? Quote:
It's interesting that you mention how different this god-concept is from the one presented in the Bible. It makes me wonder why you bother with the Bible at all... Quote:
Quote:
Some other questions are raised: you say the Bible is inspired, but not to be taken literally, and yet you believe in Jesus "100%." Why are the stories about Jesus and his life to be taken at face value? Why can't Jesus' life be just a parable? Or do you think that some parts of hte Bible are inspired and not others? If so, by what criteria do you determine which parts aren't and which parts are? I'm not trying to set up an all or nothing dichotemy, but you need a non-arbitrary way of determining which parts of the Bible are inspired and which aren't if you make this claim. Catholics, for example, trust the interpretation of the Church and the Pope for guidence on Biblical matters. So such systems are possible. So do you have a logically consistant standard of determining which parts of the bible are ture and which are false, or is it dependant simply on your whim? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I look forward to your reply. |
|||||||||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|