FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-28-2003, 06:11 AM   #101
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 4,140
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
And since God is omniscient, he saw their fate, including the childrens fate. They had zero chance for remorse and seeking forgiveness - they were completely lost and hopeless - too in love with their own desires, pleasures, and sins to heed God's repeated warnings. Because of how bad the times were, God knew the future of everyone - and every young child would have grown up, fitting in with the chaos of society - the children would have become criminals, violent and ultimately rejected God just like the adults - they were heading for their own destruction and God knew it - they were going to go to Hell. So God decided enough is enough - the world had reached the absolute worst it could get - with no chance of redemption for anyone except Noah. So God flooded the earth and wiped out the chaos and violence and evil people.
Seems like it would have been a lot simpler to just send Jesus a thousand years earlier.

Of course, being omniscient, God should have foreseen all this happening when he created the world in the first place...
MrDarwin is offline  
Old 02-28-2003, 06:13 AM   #102
Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada. Finally.
Posts: 10,155
Talking

Originally posted by Magus55
So God flooded the earth and wiped out the chaos and violence and evil people.

And yet they came back with a vengeance! Boy, how many floods does He have to send to get a little obedience?
Queen of Swords is offline  
Old 02-28-2003, 06:18 AM   #103
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by MrDarwin
Seems like it would have been a lot simpler to just send Jesus a thousand years earlier.

Of course, being omniscient, God should have foreseen all this happening when he created the world in the first place...
He did forsee it all happening - thats why Jesus coming to die for our sins was part of his plan. But God gave us free will - he knew everyone would do it, but it was by their own choice.

Jesus hasn't returned again because the world hasn't gotten bad enough yet. After Noah - the world never reached the point that it did during his time. Jesus will return when he deems the world about to "break" under the weight of its own destruction. 1000 years ago, it was only "bending".
Magus55 is offline  
Old 02-28-2003, 06:25 AM   #104
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 4,140
Default

Magus, I'm curious why you think the world was so much more awful in Noah's time than it is today.
MrDarwin is offline  
Old 02-28-2003, 06:35 AM   #105
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 3,095
Red face

Quote:
Originally posted by Stephen T-B
Dear Magus55, I would very much appreciate your answer to this question : are you able to believe in the unbelievable by sheer will power? In other words, can you CHOOSE to believe in something?
If I told you "I shall give you $5m dollars if you believe I am 18 feet tall and have five arms," would you be able to do that?
(I mean REALLY believe it; actually be certain in your mind that I am 18 feet tall and have five ams, rather than merely say "yeh, sure I believe it.")
Notice the complete inability to answer, read, or even consider this question, even after you've posed it multiple times.
Selsaral is offline  
Old 02-28-2003, 06:51 AM   #106
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

I'm also waiting for an explanation: why does Magus believe that I am definitely morally inferior to God?

The Bible says that God is good, but the Bible also says that God created evil, and that God is a deceiver. So the Bible says that the Biblical God can't be trusted on this issue. And I sure didn't create evil, and I don't generally deceive people.

So, Magus: if you're not getting that opinion from the Bible, then WHERE are you getting it from?
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 02-28-2003, 07:05 AM   #107
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 5,878
Default

Magus - look what you’ve done now.
You won’t answer my question about being able to believe the unbelievable, so I’m having to make up our conversation:
S.T-B: “So our crime is not to believe in god?”
M55: “Yes.”
S.T-B: “Is it, therefore, a crime not to believe the unbelievable?”
M55: “There is plenty of evidence that God exists.”
S.T-B: “But the evidence is unbelievable.”
M55: “That’s only because you choose not to believe it.”
S.T-B: “Are you able to choose to believe the unbelievable?”
M55: “We can all choose to disregard evidence which we find inconvenient.”
S.T-B: “Excellent point, M55! Except the evidence for the existence of god doesn’t amount to evidence. It is heresay, at best, mythical at worst.”
M55: “That’s only your opinion.”
S.T-B: “Would you agree that there is such a thing as strong evidence and such a thing as weak evidence?”
M55: “Yes.”
S.T-B: “If I told you that I cycled to work today, what sort of evidence is that?”
M55: “None. You could be lying.”
S.T-B: “If I showed you the cycle which I cycled to work on, what sort of evidence is that?”
M55: “Weak. You could still be lying, but at least I know you do have a bicycle.”
S.T-B: “If I produced one of my colleagues who signed a sworn affidavit attesting to the fact that he had witnessed me arrive at work on my bicycle, would sort of evidence would that be?”
M55: “Strong, but not conclusive.”
S.T-B: “But would it be enough to persuade you that I had, indeed, cycled to work?”
M55: “I should think so.”
S.T-B: “Suppose I told you I had sprouted wings and flown to work from home, and I produced a signed, sworn affidavit confirming that I had, what sort of evidence would that be?”
M55: “None, because the improbability of someone sprouting wings points to the probability of such an affidavit being faked.”
S.T-B: “So is it the case that extraordinary claims need to be backed by extraordinary evidence?”
M55: “Yes.”
S.T-B: “Does the Bible contain extraordinary claims about the existence of God?”
M55 (reluctantly): “Yes.”
S.T-B: “Are those extraordinary claims supported by extraordinary evidence?”
M55 (hanging his head): “No.”
S.T-B: “Thank you. So, for me to accept these extraordinary claims in the absence of extraordinary evidence requires extraordinary gullibility?”
M55: “I guess so.”
S.T-B: “And if I demonstrate extraordinary gullibility, god admits me to heaven? If I don’t, I go to hell?”
M55: “That’s the way it is.”
S.T-B: “So god likes the gullible?”
M55: “Yes.”
S.T-B: “So he can put one over them?”
M55: “Obviously.”
S.T-B: “Is this a nice god?”
M55. “Not very.”
S.T-B: “Is it a god worth making the effort to believe in.”
M55: “I shouldn’t think so.”
S.T-B. “See you in hell, then?”
M55: “Right-o.”
Stephen T-B is offline  
Old 02-28-2003, 07:10 AM   #108
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,088
Default

:notworthy
Paul2 is offline  
Old 02-28-2003, 07:48 AM   #109
Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada. Finally.
Posts: 10,155
Arrow

Just for that, I'll dedicate a Nutwatch to you.
Queen of Swords is offline  
Old 02-28-2003, 06:06 PM   #110
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,921
Default

:notworthy Stephen T-B :notworthy
Hedwig is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:06 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.