pangloss

From:
<a href="http://www.arn.org/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=13;t=000108" target="_blank">http://www.arn.org/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=13;t=000108</a>

=================================================
"Secondly, 'stationary phase' mutations, which have been debated here quite thoroughly, are evidence for EAM. Which is Bertvan's point."

mturner
=================================================


turner reported to me that he was not ignoring pertinent information, but ignoring "me" when I re-posted stationary-phase mutation damning information.

See:

<a href="http://iidb.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=58&t=000636" target="_blank">http://iidb.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=58&t=000636</a>


He has seen the information I allude many times before.

He ignored it all then, too.

He is, in my view, typical of the selective blindness that we see in the anti-Darwinian.