FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-07-2003, 05:05 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Proud Citizen of Freedonia
Posts: 42,473
Default Probably cause of shuttle crash found

16" x 16" hole formed on wing in test

This is great news that they have found the probably cause of the disaster. From this they can hopefully learn for all future actions of NASA.
Jimmy Higgins is offline  
Old 07-07-2003, 09:40 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 913
Default Re: Probably cause of shuttle crash found

Quote:
Originally posted by Jimmy Higgins
16" x 16" hole formed on wing in test

This is great news that they have found the probably cause of the disaster. From this they can hopefully learn for all future actions of NASA.
As much as I like NASA; hell, I watched every Mercury, Gemini and Apollo launch and splashdown that I could - they have a bad habit of letting their can-do attitude get in the way of rational decision making. No-one wants to be the one that scrubs a mission or casts any doubt on the perceived viability of the space program. Which leads to ignoring/discounting problems while they are problems but still manageable problems until they become disasters.
LeftCoast is offline  
Old 07-08-2003, 04:06 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cleveland, OH, USA Folding@Home Godless Team
Posts: 6,211
Default

When I worked on the Space Shuttle program (15 years ago), NASA had the term 'Success Oriented' that they used all over the place. I never did like it.
sakrilege is offline  
Old 07-08-2003, 01:04 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 913
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by sakrilege
When I worked on the Space Shuttle program (15 years ago), NASA had the term 'Success Oriented' that they used all over the place. I never did like it.
Yeah, I've been involved in projects and people that were "success oriented". It's a great euphemism and while it implies the right ideas: namely - focus on the ultimate goal and don't get sidetracked by non-productive pursuits, it is more often used as a cudgel to brand anyone who voices any concerns about the project (safety, schedule, design, etc.) as "not a team player".
LeftCoast is offline  
Old 07-09-2003, 06:36 AM   #5
Laci
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default reply

I worked for the company that made the LEM. And considering everything, it was a terrifically safe journey.
I think back then, when NASA had more $$, and could spend more time and $$ on testing and retesting, and had the top notch engineers, there was less chance of a disaster. I know they had some.
I don't think the intensity of doing a "perfect" job is part of people's psyche anymore. Too many distractions. Too much media attention. Too many unqualified engineers.
 
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:05 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.