Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
09-19-2002, 04:58 PM | #61 |
Obsessed Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
|
Indecent Exposure: 300 pounds in a bikini.
Personally, I would have no problem with phasing out the indecent exposure laws. For safety's sake I think there should be a period where it's legal only so long as it's not readily visible from a street--get people used to it before drivers have to confront it. (I have seen a naked driver once--attractive female--and she was making quite a mess of traffic. I was nearly hit twice by people paying more attention to her than the road and she caused a traffic jam on a street I had never seen a jam on before.) Businesses would remain free to impose standards like they do now (consider the very commono "No shirt, no shoes, no service" signs.) Flashers are a different matter. Flashing is a sexual act directed at another non-consenting individual, not mere exposure. I see no need for discresion in breast feeding. There should be no more need for privacy in that than in any other eating. My inclination is that normal sexual activity should be permitted in public although I would have no problem with requiring the obviously kinky stuff to be behind closed doors. I've seen a couple having sex in public once. I avoided going near them but not out of any repulsion but rather a worry about what they might be on--the place they were doing it (a concrete ridge around a parking lot) seemed quite uncomfortable and there were better locations very close by. I would also say that businesses get to say what goes on their property--so long as they put up warning signs they could permit the kinky stuff that would otherwise not be acceptable. Of course the prudes would freak out at these ideas. However, once they realized that they couldn't pretend that sex is something evil anymore then they would have to raise their children with a far more healthy attitude towards sex. |
09-19-2002, 05:11 PM | #62 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
|
Keith, I was simply saying that I don't see the big deal. How did you interpret that as knocking your fetish?
|
09-19-2002, 05:24 PM | #63 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: b
Posts: 673
|
Primal,
First, Where do you think women should feed their babies? Second, breast feeding is a health choice. Almost all main stream doctors believe that it is better for the baby than formula or milk from another source. Pumping mother's milk into a bottle is a possibility but it is a long, difficult and painful process. Try sticking your penis in a vacuum cleaner and you might get an idea of what it feels like. Also, mother's milk is not pastuerized which means that preserving it for transport is problematic. Third, learn the definition of need. Babies need to be fed. You are confusing your preference with a need. I find it amazing that in a world where on any given day you might see someone urinating in public, urban blight or yet another add for "American Idol" you find breast feeding so objectionable. Glory [ September 19, 2002: Message edited by: Glory ]</p> |
09-19-2002, 05:24 PM | #64 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: my mind
Posts: 5,996
|
Agreed with all that Loren Petchel said.
Laws against "indecent exposure" should be phased out. After all what is "indecent" is completely subjective, and laws must be objective. |
09-19-2002, 05:27 PM | #65 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: b
Posts: 673
|
Quote:
Glory |
|
09-19-2002, 06:14 PM | #66 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,102
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
This is why there's a difference. You can choose to ignore a breastfeeding mother. The child cannot ignore its hunger, nor can the mother ignore a screaming child (for long, anyway). [ September 19, 2002: Message edited by: Monkeybot ]</p> |
|||
09-19-2002, 06:38 PM | #67 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,832
|
Quote:
Last week the news was running with a study that breastfed babies were 30% more likely to develop obesity later in life. In the face of so much conflicting evidence I’m content to remain entirely agnostic. Whatever works for the individual AFAIC. |
|
09-19-2002, 10:11 PM | #68 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: The Fatal Shore
Posts: 900
|
Last week the news was running with a study that breastfed babies were 30% more likely to develop obesity later in life.
I think you've got that the wrong way around echidna... |
09-19-2002, 10:35 PM | #69 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 131
|
How about deficating in public, then? I mean, there has been a couple times when I absolutely HAD to relieve myself. Would I be within my right to just squat down in the lawn and unleash the beast? Would it be acceptable if I brought a scooper and a baggie?
|
09-19-2002, 11:29 PM | #70 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,832
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|