FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-25-2003, 08:10 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
Smile

Quote:
Pure speculation on my part, but it certainly could answer some amazing questions. What if there were copies of the four canonical gospels in the library?
Persoanlly, I don't think three of the canonical Gospels were in existence at the time. Ergo, that which did not exist at the time could not be found in that library.

Vinnie
Vinnie is offline  
Old 03-25-2003, 09:35 PM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

I'll make a prediction. No Christian documents will be found, but if they are found, there will be no mention of the letters of Paul, and nothing of the later gospel legends (JtB, Pilate, etc).

Vorkosigan
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 03-25-2003, 10:33 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
Default

You don't think Pilate or JBap were historical people?

Vinnie
Vinnie is offline  
Old 03-26-2003, 01:45 AM   #14
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 318
Default Re: Villa of the Papyri at Herculaneum

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus_Finch
There were a number of recent articles on this subject. Here is an example.

My question is this: Is there any evidence or suggestion that the contents of this library may influence or effect thought on the history of early Christianity or the composition of the Bible? It is my understanding that the library was buried in volcanic ash in 79 A.D. According to church history there were Christians in Rome by that date and even some among the emperor's household.

Pure speculation on my part, but it certainly could answer some amazing questions. What if there were copies of the four canonical gospels in the library?

I'm not looking for an argument on this issue. Although I'm sure I would enjoy reading one if there are differing view

Regards,

Finch
According to Paul Berry, in 1862, a German archaeolgist Alfred Keisling discovered the Christian insription CHRISTIANOS at Pompeii approximately 10 miles from Herculaneum.

There were Jewish communities in a number of Roman cities including Pompeii and Puteoli near to Herculaneum. It has puzzled me why the NT appears to have no early missionary activities to Roman cities, when this would seem to be an obvious first choice. It is my opinion that some of "Peter's" activities were in these cities and not in Joppa etc.

Geoff
Geoff Hudson is offline  
Old 03-26-2003, 03:55 AM   #15
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Vinnie
You don't think Pilate or JBap were historical people?

Vinnie
No, I don't think they were incorporated into the NT legends until a later date.
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 03-26-2003, 05:19 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Vorkosigan
No, I don't think they were incorporated into the NT legends until a later date.
On what grounds do you see Jesus' baptism by John and his crucifixion by Pilate as being legendary?

Vinnie
Vinnie is offline  
Old 03-26-2003, 06:50 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,505
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Vinnie Were you saying something about healings in Mark?
I said he was an imperfect healer, not inept.

Why would an omnipotent God in human form be unable to perform miracles?

Quote:
Newsflash. Mark's redactional work concerning the apsotles is well noted. Though overall, they are portrayed positively disput all the idiocy Mark attributes to them. This portrayal of the disciples is for polemical reasons in Mark.
You've shifted the focus of my statement to the apostles "idiocy" from my original point, that a supposedly "perfect" man showed impatience.

Quote:
Actually, the messianic secret stems from the fact that either Jesus didn't use the term Messiah to refer to himself or he did consider himself the Messiah but Jesus never publically
designated himself as Messiah.
Maybe he never publically designated himself as Messiah because he wasn't the Messiah.

-Mike...
mike_decock is offline  
Old 03-26-2003, 06:57 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,505
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Vinnie
Does gospel = good news? is mark not teaching the goodnews of Jesus Christ????
Maybe the original Mark had a different "good news" or maybe none at all. I have no idea how much Mark has been modified since it's original writing. I'm just speculating on a "what-if" scenario that I think would be amusing.

-Mike...
mike_decock is offline  
Old 03-26-2003, 10:41 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
Default

Quote:
Why would an omnipotent God in human form be unable to perform miracles?
I have no clue. Maybe someone who thinks the historical Jesus of Nazareth possessed omnipotence can answer that question for you?

Quote:
You've shifted the focus of my statement to the apostles "idiocy" from my original point, that a supposedly "perfect" man showed impatience.
We cannot naively grant historicity to Mark's polemic driven portrayal of Jesus' disciples.

Further, I am not sure what you mean by a perfect man? And if you define a perfect human so as to include never being angry/aggrivated/impatient then sure, Jesus wasn't perfect. I really don't know what perfect means here though? And I am sure that not all Christians (most of which recognize that it is official doctrine that Jesus was fully human) will argue Jesus was perfect in a naive fashion. But maybe you meant "sinless" rather than perfect?

Quote:
Maybe he never publically designated himself as Messiah because he wasn't the Messiah.
Uh, isn't that what I said? I'll repeat (notice the bold):

Quote:
Actually, the messianic secret stems from the fact that either Jesus didn't use the term Messiah to refer to himself or he did consider himself the Messiah but Jesus never publically
designated himself as Messiah.

And actually my comment was inaccurate. The "messianic secret" is very complex and does not necessarily" or "solely" stem from that. What I said above is, as best as I can tell, similar to Wrede's explanation: Jesus never claimed to be Messiah but Mark thought he was and needed to create this secrecy. Of course many scholars today would find Wrede's understanding too simplistic and I tend to agree with them.

I do think that it may be part of the messianic secret though. I agree with Sanders that the Synoptic authors and the Christians before them and after them all thought Jesus was the Messiah. But we see that Mark, Matthew and Luke could cite little direct evidence and what they did cite is qualified (e.g. the "Who do you say I am" account). But the messianic secret in Mark is probably much more complex than that.

Vinnie
Vinnie is offline  
Old 03-27-2003, 03:35 AM   #20
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Vinnie
On what grounds do you see Jesus' baptism by John and his crucifixion by Pilate as being legendary?

Vinnie
JBap -- all other appearances of Jbap in the gospels are constructions there to attack him and elevate Jesus in relation to him. Therefore Mark's is probably as well. Josephus specifically denies claims central to JBap in the gospels and makes no mention of his connection to Jesus.

Pilate: in the earliest non-gospel reference, Pilate is simply used as a marker to date Jesus's death. The whole passion is a fiction built off of OT chunks, therefore all details in it are suspect, including the fact of Pilate's involvement.

It is not so much that I think they are fictional, it is that I do not know of any good reason to accept anything the gospels say about the life of Jesus.

Vorkosigan
Vorkosigan is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:51 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.