FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

View Poll Results: when does a human being have access to the protection of the laws of our land?
after conception 9 12.86%
3 months after conception 7 10.00%
6 months after conception 15 21.43%
9 months after conception 3 4.29%
after birth 33 47.14%
18 years after birth 3 4.29%
Voters: 70. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-16-2003, 07:39 AM   #41
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ill
Posts: 6,577
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by fatherphil
but isn't the perception that a solution in the quality of a person's life lies in his elimination rather than improving his surroundings at the crux of the tragedy?
I think the fundamental tragedy is that people are being created who are not wanted and/or not able to be cared for appropriately.

Helen
HelenM is offline  
Old 07-16-2003, 07:40 AM   #42
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: somewhere in the known Universe
Posts: 6,993
Default

Quote:
I am concerned about that too.
Of course you are and I hope I didn't apply otherwise

Brighid
brighid is offline  
Old 07-16-2003, 07:41 AM   #43
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ill
Posts: 6,577
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by brighid
Eliminating abortion will do nothing to improve the environment that makes abortion necessary.

Brighid
...and, fwiw, some pro-life advocates know this and are involved trying to improve the environment.

Not all of them simply argue against/oppose abortion.

Helen
HelenM is offline  
Old 07-16-2003, 07:46 AM   #44
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: somewhere in the known Universe
Posts: 6,993
Default

Quote:
and, fwiw, some pro-life advocates know this and are involved trying to improve the environment.
Yes, too bad there aren't more I think that those "pro-life" people and organizations that do nothing more then condemn women shouldn't be allowed to use the term but rather be more succinct in their portrayals and simply state the truth: anti-woman, pro-life for the unborn, but once they are born we couldn't give a shit less (and we will do everything in our power to remove the few resources available that help to make life easier/better.)

Brighid
brighid is offline  
Old 07-16-2003, 09:43 AM   #45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: burbank
Posts: 758
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by HelenM
I think the fundamental tragedy is that people are being created who are not wanted and/or not able to be cared for appropriately.

Helen
so if a baby is born who is not wanted (maybe a girl instead of a boy) or not able to be cared for appropriately ( i have no idea of what you consider appropriate care) it would be better off dead?
fatherphil is offline  
Old 07-16-2003, 09:49 AM   #46
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ill
Posts: 6,577
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by fatherphil
HelenM: I think the fundamental tragedy is that people are being created who are not wanted and/or not able to be cared for appropriately.

so if a baby is born who is not wanted (maybe a girl instead of a boy) or not able to be cared for appropriately ( i have no idea of what you consider appropriate care) it would be better off dead?
Can you explain how you got there from my comment?

Helen
HelenM is offline  
Old 07-16-2003, 09:53 AM   #47
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: burbank
Posts: 758
Default

when presented with the quality of life issue and the abortion issue, you stated the "fundamental" on the qol side.
fatherphil is offline  
Old 07-16-2003, 10:07 AM   #48
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North America
Posts: 457
Default

I don’t know enough about biology to say when life begins. Clearly, after birth you are a person. And a zygote is just a grouping of cells, and lacks even a central nervous system. Unless you believe some intangible “soul” jumps in at the moment of conception then I can’t see why you would give a zygote any moral consideration.
But the period in between birth and shortly after conception I don’t know. An infant after birth and an infant ten minutes before birth don’t differ in any significant way (other than one not having been born). So there seems there is a point before birth that one becomes a human being worthy of moral consideration. I flunked biology so I don’t know enough to speculate precisely when that is.
However the wording of the poll seems to imply that just because you establish something as a human life then aborting it should be illegal. I don’t think deciding when an abortion is morally permissible should be the jurisdiction of the state.
YHWH666 is offline  
Old 07-16-2003, 10:11 AM   #49
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by YHWH666
I flunked biology so I don’t know enough to speculate precisely when that is.
Nobody who DIDN'T flunk biology does either.
yguy is offline  
Old 07-16-2003, 10:19 AM   #50
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The South.
Posts: 2,122
Default

Why did the SCOTUS draw the line at the third trimester?

What phenomal thing happens between the last day of the second trimester and the first day of the third trimester that suddenly changes the "blob of cells" into a "human fetus"?

Michelle
Bad Kitty is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:12 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.