Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-26-2002, 02:44 PM | #181 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Quote:
|
|
06-26-2002, 02:46 PM | #182 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Broomfield, Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,295
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
06-26-2002, 02:47 PM | #183 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
<a href="http://www.aclu.org/news/2002/n062602b.html" target="_blank">ACLU press release</a>
Quote:
|
|
06-26-2002, 02:49 PM | #184 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,198
|
Well, bone them all. Now I'm *definetly* going to the Godless Americans March. All this hatred, all this anger, all this ... *bullshit* has got me riled up. That march needs all the numbers it can muster.
I need me some "Bad Religion" songs right about now . --W@L |
06-26-2002, 02:50 PM | #185 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Almaden, California
Posts: 917
|
I just printed out all 28 pages of the ruling from <a href="http://www.findlaw.com" target="_blank">www.findlaw.com</a> and will enjoy reading the whole thing tonight. Hurrah!
[ June 26, 2002: Message edited by: gilly54 ]</p> |
06-26-2002, 02:51 PM | #186 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
|
Falwell jabbered:
"This is probably the most dangerous ruling of any Federal Court in American history because it is a declaration that America is no longer 'one nation under God.'" Hahaha. Poor God. He must be hurt. But that's nothing. Democrat Susan Landrieu of Louisiana was just on the floor of the Senate comparing it to Dred Scott and Plessy v. Ferguson. |
06-26-2002, 02:52 PM | #187 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Gardnerville, NV
Posts: 666
|
What will a likely Supreme Court head count look like in your opinions? That Rhenquist, Scalia and Thomas would rule to overturn almost goes without saying. Who would be the other two justices, assuming the ruling is overturned? I don't see O'Connor doing so, and I am too unfamiliar with the histories of the other judges to offer guesses.
|
06-26-2002, 02:54 PM | #188 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,198
|
Darwin's Finch, when it comes to the Lawd Gawd Jerhovie, there are no political distinctions.
<img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" /> Anyway, apparently Michael Newdow <a href="http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/connie.chung.tonight/" target="_blank">will be on Connie Chung tonight.</a> AFAIK, this will be his first public, national comments since the decision. --W@L [ June 26, 2002: Message edited by: Writer@Large ]</p> |
06-26-2002, 02:57 PM | #189 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Have any of you listened to the CSPAN Senate hearings? Im disgusted. Our senators are idiots, but what can you expect from a republican from alabama or kansas. *Sigh*
|
06-26-2002, 03:00 PM | #190 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,198
|
Gee, it wouldn't be a religious controversy without the Family Research Council having their say:
Quote:
--W@L |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|