FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-18-2003, 10:18 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the dark places of the world
Posts: 8,093
Default Dubya ready to veer far right on Supreme Court nomination

"Compassionate conservatism" - the new euphemism for stealth rightwing politics.

---

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2003Jan18.html

Bush Set For High Court Battle
Strategy Is to Nominate Ideological Conservative

By Mike Allen and Charles Lane
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, January 19, 2003; Page A01


White House aides have developed a strategy for filling a future vacancy on the Supreme Court that calls for nominating an ideological conservative even if it increases the chance that the person would not be confirmed, administration officials said.

[...]
Although Bush has pursued a middle course on some issues, this emerging approach to Supreme Court nominations signals the administration's intention to govern largely from the right now that the Senate is back in Republican hands. The strategy is in keeping with the White House's announcement of an economic plan heavy on tax cuts and the renomination of conservative lower court judges previously rejected by Senate Democrats.

The Supreme Court strategy also implies that Republican conservatives have gained the upper hand in the internal administration debate over whether the president's political interest lies in rewarding his core supporters or in courting Hispanic voters by naming the first member of that fast-growing voting population to the court.

Conservatives are concerned about Gonzales's views on affirmative action and abortion. The right blames him for the administration's initial hesitation to support a challenge at the Supreme Court to the University of Michigan's race-conscious admissions program. And antiabortion groups dislike an opinion he wrote as a Texas Supreme Court justice supporting a teenager's right to have an abortion without telling her parents.
Sauron is offline  
Old 01-23-2003, 02:39 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: GR, MI USA
Posts: 4,009
Default

Well, the shrub made his litmus intentions clear during the pledge controversy. The best we can do is try to block all his nominees for the next 2 years.
ELECTROGOD is offline  
Old 01-23-2003, 04:01 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Melrose, MA
Posts: 961
Default

Well since according to some people on this site there's no difference at all between the GOP and the Democrats I'm sure all of us non-believers have nothing to fear from Bush's right-wing judicial nominees . . . . right?
Grad Student Humanist is offline  
Old 01-24-2003, 06:42 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Middle, Kansas
Posts: 2,637
Default

The best way to protect the court is for none of the liberals or moderates to retire. Then get a less conservative pres in the White House in 2 years. If Scalia or Renquist retire and Bushie replaces them with a right winger it will have virtually no impact. Our only fear is exchanging a currently good justice with a bad Bush Nominee.
dangin is offline  
Old 03-13-2003, 11:34 AM   #5
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NYC, New York
Posts: 114
Default

Unfortunately, the oldest Justice on the Supreme Court is John Paul Stevens, argueably the most liberal one (despite being a Republican appointee). He was born in 1920, so he'll be 83 this year.

I see Alberto Gonzalez as a potential David Souter, so if Bush must appoint someone, it should be him. If it turns out he'll nominate Miguel Estrada, watch out.
crownboy is offline  
Old 03-13-2003, 12:43 PM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Folding@Home in upstate NY
Posts: 14,394
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by ELECTROGOD
Well, the shrub made his litmus intentions clear during the pledge controversy. The best we can do is try to block all his nominees for the next 2 years.
Yeah, let's keep our fingers crossed! Maybe there'll be some Action Alerts, so we can notify our Senators to block the nominations (check here for Alerts).

Cool smilie!
Shake is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:00 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.