Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Elora · 06-27-2003, 11:51 AM

Quote:

...the King James Bible (except for the ones who reject the KJV because King James himself was a homosexual.)

Seriously? I'd never heard that. He was a homosexual?

Oh, that must absolutely blow some fundamentalist minds when they hear it. They probably short-circuit.

Toto · 06-27-2003, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Elora
Seriously? I'd never heard that. He was a homosexual?

Oh, that must absolutely blow some fundamentalist minds when they hear it. They probably short-circuit.

Thank a Homosexual for your Bible

Who was King James?

Jack Chick DENIES rumors about King James

So does Jesus-Is-Lord.com (even though their site has been suspended by their ISP

anakata · 06-27-2003, 07:16 PM

Electronic identification is satanic? So then how did they put up their web page? Anonymous FTP with R/W access? :-) Also then supposedly signatures and HMAC must be satanic. I must have my own spot reserved in Hell long ago for all the times I've implemented them...

06-28-2003, 11:44 PM

I think King James I & VI was bisexual. At least he managed to father several children and no-one ever doubted that they were his.

6748_smith_w · 06-30-2003, 06:13 AM

Man uses strict faith as defense
Husband says woman shouldn't be defendant in breast-feeding case
By Ed Meyer
Beacon Journal staff writer

http://www.ohio.com/mld/ohio/news/6156959.htm

edited by Jewel to replace copyrighted text with link

cydonia · 06-30-2003, 06:35 AM

Does that mean his wife can murder someone and he'll be the one put on trial? Weird.

But, God works in mysterious ways. It's not my place to question JESUS.

Still, he'll look funny in prison. "what are you in for, buddy?"

"breastfeeding."

"you'll fit in real nice."

Rhaedas · 06-30-2003, 06:49 AM

I'm glad the La Leche League sided on the safety issue of the infant. It's amazing what power steering and automatic transmissions give idiots the opportunity to do on the roads at high speeds.

I'm actually shocked that any state wouldn't consider this act child endangerment...especially the driver of the car.

Stephen Maturin · 06-30-2003, 08:17 AM

There's another thread on this in the CSS&SA forum. The abundant fundy nutjobbery in this story aside, I'd dearly love to be there when the husband tries to arrest the prosecutor.

dangin · 06-30-2003, 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Stephen Maturin
There's another thread on this in the CSS&SA forum. The abundant fundy nutjobbery in this story aside, I'd dearly love to be there when the husband tries to arrest the prosecutor.

Not anymore, I merged the two threads.

Stephen Maturin · 08-08-2003, 11:40 AM

The verdict is in. Guilty on the child restraint, driving without a license and fleeing-and-eluding charges, but not guilty of child endangerment.

06-30-2003, 06:13 AM	#15
6748_smith_w Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: USA Posts: 69	religious idiot driving while breastfeeding Man uses strict faith as defense Husband says woman shouldn't be defendant in breast-feeding case By Ed Meyer Beacon Journal staff writer http://www.ohio.com/mld/ohio/news/6156959.htm edited by Jewel to replace copyrighted text with link

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

06-27-2003, 07:16 PM	#13
anakata Regular Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Sweden Posts: 194	Electronic identification is satanic? So then how did they put up their web page? Anonymous FTP with R/W access? :-) Also then supposedly signatures and HMAC must be satanic. I must have my own spot reserved in Hell long ago for all the times I've implemented them...

06-28-2003, 11:44 PM	#14
DMB Guest Posts: n/a	I think King James I & VI was bisexual. At least he managed to father several children and no-one ever doubted that they were his.

06-30-2003, 06:35 AM	#16
cydonia Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: southern california Posts: 1,002	Does that mean his wife can murder someone and he'll be the one put on trial? Weird. But, God works in mysterious ways. It's not my place to question JESUS. Still, he'll look funny in prison. "what are you in for, buddy?" "breastfeeding." "you'll fit in real nice."

06-30-2003, 06:49 AM	#17
Rhaedas Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: USA Posts: 3,440	I'm glad the La Leche League sided on the safety issue of the infant. It's amazing what power steering and automatic transmissions give idiots the opportunity to do on the roads at high speeds. I'm actually shocked that any state wouldn't consider this act child endangerment...especially the driver of the car.

06-30-2003, 08:17 AM	#18
Stephen Maturin Veteran Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Broomfield, Colorado, USA Posts: 1,295	There's another thread on this in the CSS&SA forum. The abundant fundy nutjobbery in this story aside, I'd dearly love to be there when the husband tries to arrest the prosecutor.

08-08-2003, 11:40 AM	#20
Stephen Maturin Veteran Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Broomfield, Colorado, USA Posts: 1,295	The verdict is in. Guilty on the child restraint, driving without a license and fleeing-and-eluding charges, but not guilty of child endangerment.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.