FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-01-2003, 09:45 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,047
Question Math question

I'm trying to figure something out. See this diagram for my explanation.



I have the X and Y for both A and B. I want to find C and D.

Now, I remember doing something like this in a calculus course, but I haven't used it in a while, and I can't remember any key words that will find it through a search engine.

And thank you to anyone who can help me with this.
-RRH- is offline  
Old 04-01-2003, 10:29 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 957
Default

Okay you have:

A = (Ax, Ay)
B = (Bx, By)

And are trying to find:

C = (Cx, Cy)
D = (Dx, Dy)

You know that the slope from the origin for points B and C are identical, so:

(Cy - 0)/(Cx - 0) = (By - 0)/(Bx - 0) --> Cy/Cx = By/Bx

and you know that the slope from C to A is perpendicular to this:

(Ay - Cy)/(Ax - Cx) = -Bx/By

So now you have two equations and two unknowns (Cx and Cy). Repeating the process for D, we know that the slope from D to A is parallel to the slope from the origin to B, so:

(Ay - Dy)/(Ax - Dx) = By/Bx

And since the slope from the origin to D is perpendicular:

Dy/Dx = -Bx/By

So now you have two equations and two unknowns for D as well. From here it's just another textbook algebra problem.
Jinto is offline  
Old 04-02-2003, 03:14 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: god's judge (pariah)
Posts: 1,281
Default

Only at II!
keyser_soze is offline  
Old 04-02-2003, 06:05 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 1,827
Default

PS: Jinto's post assumes the lines are orthogonal (i.e. that the quadrangle passing through A, C, D and the intersection of the black lines is a rectangle and that the black lines are orthogonal to one another).

Feather is offline  
Old 04-02-2003, 08:12 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,047
Default Whoops.

Quote:
Originally posted by Feather
PS: Jinto's post assumes the lines are orthogonal (i.e. that the quadrangle passing through A, C, D and the intersection of the black lines is a rectangle and that the black lines are orthogonal to one another).

Right, I guess I really should have put in them little squares to show that is the case.

Thanks Jinto!
-RRH- is offline  
Old 04-07-2003, 09:30 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,330
Default Re: Math question

Quote:
Originally posted by RRH


Now, I remember doing something like this in a calculus course, but I haven't used it in a while

A Calculus course!! as the solution given shows this can be done by simple school level geometry. Why would you think you need calculus?
tensorproduct is offline  
Old 04-07-2003, 09:44 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Shadowy Planet
Posts: 7,585
Default

It looks like using rotation matrices would be the easiest approach to this problem.
Shadowy Man is offline  
Old 04-07-2003, 10:21 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 6,264
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Shadowy Man
It looks like using rotation matrices would be the easiest approach to this problem.
I think the easiest method would be to draw a scale on each axis derived from one known point (and verified by the other known point). Then just read off the co-ordinates of the two unknown points.
ImGod is offline  
Old 04-07-2003, 10:48 AM   #9
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Folding@Home in upstate NY
Posts: 14,394
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally posted by Shadowy Man
It looks like using rotation matrices would be the easiest approach to this problem.
Blech! Well, yeah, if you like that sort of thing! Not me. I can (well I could at one time) do calculus in 3D, but linear algebra ... YUCK! For some reason, I always had trouble with it. Maybe cause I know it shouldn't be that hard ... in fact, it gave me such an unpleasant experience, I doubt if I could go back to my old texts on it.
Shake is offline  
Old 04-07-2003, 01:06 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 957
Default

Um, guys, I hate to point this out, but his problem has alrady been solved, so your discussion is moot.
Jinto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:31 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.