Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
11-01-2002, 01:17 AM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,956
|
Does the principle of uncertainity apply to massless particle as well?
Hi guys, I know that the principle of uncertainity works for particles with rest mass but what about those massless particle like photons, gravitons and gluons, does the principle apply as well? If yes, what are the wavefunctions for photons and gluons?
Hope that you guys have some answers to my questions. |
11-01-2002, 02:53 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Denver, Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,834
|
I am fairly certain that the priciples of uncertainty and wave/particle duality apply to photons and believe that there are experiments to back that up.
I don't know that there are any cases of gluons being directly observed to be sure -- gluons are inferred from the way particle collisions break up. I also am not certain that gluons are in fact massless -- W particles are not. Gravitons are merely conjectural particles for which we have no evidence, so there is no way to know about them. My physics isn't good enough to provide a wave function. |
11-01-2002, 07:54 PM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,956
|
I had guessed before that the wave function of a massless particle should be very similar to that of a free particle in a free space. However, I don't see how Schrodinger equation works in this case.
|
11-02-2002, 09:36 PM | #4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: arse-end of the world
Posts: 2,305
|
Quote:
[ November 02, 2002: Message edited by: Friar Bellows ]</p> |
|
11-03-2002, 07:08 PM | #5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,956
|
Quote:
Could you offer me some links? I have some difficulty in searching for that Dirac equation in the web. |
|
11-03-2002, 08:19 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: US and UK
Posts: 846
|
I don't understand why you think it shouldn't. Uncertainty relations govern momentum/position and energy/time. A photon may be massless but has well defined momentum and energy. Since momentum is related to wavelength, you can see that the more precisely we know the photon's wavelength the less precisely we know its position. In a sense you can think of it this way - you need to measure over a significant distance to determine wavelength.
Frequency and energy are related so there is an uncertainty principle relating frequency and time. In practice, this means that a short pulse laser is limited in how pure a fequency it can have ('transform limited bandwidth') - the photons are definitively within a short interval in time and so have uncertainy in energy (=frequency) - bandwidth and pulse length are inversely related. On the other hand, a continuous wave laser can have a much purer frequency since it has effectively an 'infinitely' long pulse. |
11-03-2002, 10:05 PM | #7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: arse-end of the world
Posts: 2,305
|
Quote:
Also, beausoleil is right as usual. Photons have momentum: p = E / c where E is their energy, c is the speed of light. |
|
11-06-2002, 05:51 PM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 1,827
|
If an object can be represented using the Schrodinger equation (which all particles can be), then there are uncertainty relations associated with it. Whether the particle has no rest mass (i.e. is "massless") or not.
|
11-06-2002, 06:31 PM | #9 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL Reality Adventurer
Posts: 5,276
|
Quote:
As for the “wavefunction” for any physical system this is obtained by solving the suitable quantum equation for the physical system. To create the quantum equation one usually constructs the classical Hamiltonian and then converts it to a quantum equation by applying the operator transformations for momentum and energy. If you are lucky this will result in a second order linear differential equation with constant coefficients. The standard mathematical techniques can be used to solve this equation. It usually results in a set of Eigenfunctions which are referred to as the Eigenstates. Since the equation is linear any solution can be constructed as a linear superposition of these Eigenstates. Using this and the boundary conditions of the physical system results in what is called the “wavefunction” of the system. You can also take these Eigenstates and using the Schmitd Orthogonalization method create a basis set of Eigenvectors. This is the starting point for the Dirac interpretation of QM. IMO it is impossible to understand QM using common sense. The best you can do is master the machinery of the mathematics and use it to make predictions. It is pointless to try to use common sense to understand, that which is not common to the senses. Starboy |
|
11-06-2002, 07:48 PM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Eastern Massachusetts
Posts: 1,677
|
I'm not sure
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|