FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-10-2002, 01:46 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: N.Ireland
Posts: 527
Post Why are millions of year old skulls found on the surface?

This has always puzzled me.
These really really old fossils - millions of years old are looked for on the surface.
Most aren't excavated.

Why is this?
I cannot see a skulls lying on the surface of the earth for 7 million years and not being chewed by some scavenger or at least buried.
Surely in 7 million years - even bones on the surface would have desintergrated - wind blowing sand and dust.
I just can't get my mind around why they aren't buried.

It's not as if these are feak finds - people employ local tribes people because of their good eyesight to help them detected these bits of skull etc.

Any offers?
davidH is offline  
Old 09-10-2002, 02:20 PM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mars
Posts: 2,231
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by davidH:
<strong>This has always puzzled me.
These really really old fossils - millions of years old are looked for on the surface.
Most aren't excavated.

Why is this?
I cannot see a skulls lying on the surface of the earth for 7 million years and not being chewed by some scavenger or at least buried.
Surely in 7 million years - even bones on the surface would have desintergrated - wind blowing sand and dust.
I just can't get my mind around why they aren't buried.

It's not as if these are feak finds - people employ local tribes people because of their good eyesight to help them detected these bits of skull etc.

Any offers?</strong>
It's a cosmic wonder to me!
John Hancock is offline  
Old 09-10-2002, 02:21 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Dunmanifestin, Discworld
Posts: 4,836
Post

First off, any bone that's millions of years old isn't bone anymore. It's fossilized, and is now stone.

Second, the fossils are buried for large amounts of time. At some point, due to erosion or seismic activity, they're brought up close to the surface.

Third, what's this doing in Political Discussion?
elwoodblues is offline  
Old 09-10-2002, 02:25 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lucky Bucky, Oz
Posts: 5,645
Post

Stop wondering about stuff you're supposed to have studied in Middle School, folks, and do some research on the net. Meanwhile think over the fact that piling dust becomes rock in the end. Given the right circumstances, bone can too.

Anyway, check out some good sites and they'll tell you everything you need.

AVE

(elwoodblues proved a few minutes faster to basically say what I wanted to say...)

[ September 10, 2002: Message edited by: Laurentius ]</p>
Laurentius is offline  
Old 09-10-2002, 02:26 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: ...
Posts: 2,191
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by davidH:
<strong>This has always puzzled me.
These really really old fossils - millions of years old are looked for on the surface.
Most aren't excavated.

Why is this?
I cannot see a skulls lying on the surface of the earth for 7 million years and not being chewed by some scavenger or at least buried.
Surely in 7 million years - even bones on the surface would have desintergrated - wind blowing sand and dust.
I just can't get my mind around why they aren't buried.

It's not as if these are feak finds - people employ local tribes people because of their good eyesight to help them detected these bits of skull etc.

Any offers?</strong>
You sound like a conservative.
Krieger is offline  
Old 09-10-2002, 02:28 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: right behind you
Posts: 26
Post

Quote:
I cannot see a skulls lying on the surface of the earth for 7 million years and not being chewed by some scavenger or at least buried.
The fossils that we find were buried, very soon after the organism died. Over time, the rock encasing the fossils was eroded away, bringing the bones to the surface.
Chupa-arbol is offline  
Old 09-10-2002, 02:29 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 2,214
Post

My guess is that if these fossils are several million years old, they haven't been lying around on the surface for all of that time. Due to erosion via wind or water, they just recently came to the surface.

What does this have to do with politics?
Abacus is offline  
Old 09-10-2002, 02:43 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
Post

We generally find only fragments on the surface, if it is really on the surface. Often these things are mostly buried, and have just started poking through.
Doubting Didymus is offline  
Old 09-10-2002, 02:50 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lucky Bucky, Oz
Posts: 5,645
Post

Here's a link to politics:

Native Indians in some US areas forbid scientists to dig up scheletons and study them. Some of these scheletons have proved to have belonged to people that had inhabited North America before the arrival of the populations later known as Native Indians.

Some may say it is a religious or a cultural issue, but I definitely it's politics.

AVE
Laurentius is offline  
Old 09-10-2002, 03:30 PM   #10
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mars
Posts: 2,231
Question

Think they'll vote for Bush?
John Hancock is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:11 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.