Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-08-2003, 05:35 AM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 1,211
|
Do people still think that the Raelians really produced a clone?
I have met a few people recently who seem to be under the impression that the Raelian cloning is a done and dusted affair and humans have been cloned. The only things I can ascribe this to are either a ludicrously uncritical acceptance of tabloid journalist headlines, and a subsequent failure to read the story, or a general lack of follow up in any, non science based, media to cover the ongoing lack of evidence.
I can understand that "Still no evidence of cloned babies" is a pretty dull headline, but doesnt the media have some obligation to set the record straight after their huge coverage of the initial claims? Has anyone else come across this sort of attitude? |
04-08-2003, 05:46 AM | #2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Akron, OH - The only state that aspires to be like Kansas
Posts: 19
|
Do you really believe that the media would do such a thing? Ruin the sensation that they started?
Because I don't. But on the topic of cloning, almost everyone I know doesn't believe the Raelians. As with most other things, I will retain my scepticism until credible proof, not just an allegation by a "non-profit organisation" which I find more unconvincing than X-ianity, can be supplied. |
04-08-2003, 05:48 AM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 3,341
|
No, quite the opposite. The fact that they've backed off on any testing to confirm their claims pretty much confirms that they are a gang of looney-tunes fabulists, at least in the crowd I run with...you know, rational people.
|
04-08-2003, 05:49 AM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,335
|
IT'S ALL TRUE DAMMIT!!
But seriously, with regard to the media, there's the old axiom of "if it bleeds. it leads." The moral vacuum of media precludes the likelihood that any further news on the subject will be published unless the refutation of the Raelian claims can be classified as sensationalistic. It's a common enough attitude (extensively prevalent!), but ultimately the onus rests on us as individuals to bypass the media circus bias to get the facts behind the real story (and this includes the follow-up too). |
04-08-2003, 05:56 AM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 1,211
|
All news is a case of caveat lectorin your opinion? Sounds reasonable to me. Some of the propaganda we get in the news today certainly reinforces that impression.
|
04-08-2003, 06:22 AM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,335
|
caveat lector is a nice touch. But given the vast amounts of shit we need to sift through just to get a weather report these days, why should we complacently be spoon fed information we are told we need to receive?
I watch the news or read a paper/magazine to listen to opinion. If I want facts I go to the relevant journals, or textbooks, or to respected colleagues. Not that the latter is unbiased, but that is a type of bias I can account for; with mainstream media, you have no idea what agenda is being foisted upon you. |
04-08-2003, 04:58 PM | #7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: OC
Posts: 1,620
|
5 babies and no proof?... even when it would be fairly easy to do without "revealing" identities. The media were highly irresponsible for overreporting it in the first place and I think unless there is hoax-busting info that comes out, they are right to remain quiet on the whole. All the ink they give to them is more money in their shit-spewing pockets.
I wish I could delete them somehow from my brain...they don't deserve any space there. They should give them less attention than stories about Bigfoot. |
04-10-2003, 05:44 PM | #8 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ca., USA
Posts: 283
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|