Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-25-2002, 11:12 PM | #31 | ||||||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 178
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Good thing you didn't have to pay for that information. It is pretty dated and pathetic. xr |
||||||
01-25-2002, 11:23 PM | #32 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 178
|
Quote:
xr |
|
01-26-2002, 10:00 AM | #33 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 77
|
Two suggestions for really stupid ideas to use (sorry if some creationist thought them up first)
How the light from distant stars got here: They were created close up and then accelerated to their current positions. Evidence: galaxies are actually receding. Dinosaur skeletons: Ordinary lizards that grew to huge sizes in the nice conditions before the flood. |
01-26-2002, 12:34 PM | #34 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
|
Consider adding a unique apocalyptic twist to your tale that explains not only our origins but also the "scientific facts" showing that the obviously IDed earth is clearly in the "end times;" fundies just love that kind of stuff. You'll be demonstrating not only the truth of creation but also your unique God-given understanding of what it holds for us in the future and why. Who wouldn't buy such a book?
Cite the "recent creation" of HIV, antibiotic resistance, increased numbers of shark attacks, volcanic eruptions, and a few really twisted lies (making some of it up will give you the appearance of being an authentic fundie), tie them all together with some techno-babble about the 2LoT (fundies will accept any explanation that makes evolution appear impossible), moon dust, 9/11, and then juxtapose some verses from the Book of Revelation. NY Times Best Seller List material! |
01-27-2002, 08:25 AM | #35 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: southeast
Posts: 2,526
|
Another suggestion: use nothing but misleading misquotes from legitimate researchers. That gives you some very credible sources to draw from. However, if anyone actually looks at the quote, it will be clear that the book is bogus, and you may limit your damage in scientific circles. This also makes it easier for scientists to win debates, since we will have handed the creationists our own, carefully constructed, straw man.
You might want to make sure the misquoted scientist is informed of this tactic, just to keep from getting in legal trouble. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|