Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-01-2003, 08:34 AM | #21 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 136
|
Quote:
|
|
02-01-2003, 09:06 AM | #22 |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 282
|
They can't stop...
There are two astronauts manning the ISS right now. EDIT: Sorry, it's three... |
02-01-2003, 09:42 AM | #23 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,234
|
Quote:
|
|
02-01-2003, 09:49 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Chicago
Posts: 774
|
This incident, as tragic as it is, should not be viewed as a reason for abandoning our spaee program. After all, this is only the second major tragedy in the shuttle program's history. NASA has an excellent track record considering how dangerous space travel really is. It might be better to view this incident as a reason always to take our vulnerability into account in our scientific endeavors and not to allow our hubris, in our ability to achieve technological progress without cognizance of the serious risks and problems that can arise along the way, to overtake us.
John Phillip Brooks |
02-01-2003, 10:43 AM | #25 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I've left FRDB for good, due to new WI&P policy
Posts: 12,048
|
Quote:
I was in the USN out at sea when Challenger exploded in 1986. The ship was doing exercises off the coast of Southern California, but the captain brought us close enough to shore to pick up the civilian TV broadcasts about the disaster. I cried then, and I couldn't hold back the tears this time either. There's an another difficulty with the ISS beyond the fact that there is a crew of three on board. The ISS hasn't yet received its own propulsion unit. It requires periodic visits from the shuttle so the shuttle's engines can be used to boost the orbit of the ISS, or the orbit will decay fairly rapidly. |
|
02-01-2003, 10:44 AM | #26 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Sundsvall, Sweden
Posts: 3,159
|
Quote:
|
|
02-01-2003, 11:05 AM | #27 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: US east coast. And www.theroyalforums.com
Posts: 2,829
|
Wasn't VP Al Gore pushing very hard for the space plane follow-on to the Shuttle? And didn't Bush cancel the programme soon after taking office?
NASA has a bunch of not very pleasant choices here - either it gives up the manned programme or it bleeds the rest of NASA dry to replace Columbia - and the ISS was already causing a lot of that bleeding as it was. |
02-01-2003, 11:15 AM | #28 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 2,214
|
Quote:
|
|
02-01-2003, 11:17 AM | #29 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 2,214
|
Quote:
|
|
02-01-2003, 11:40 AM | #30 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Norfolk, VA, USA
Posts: 219
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|