FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-30-2003, 08:52 AM   #51
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 4,140
Default

Paul, I have politely answered some of your questions, and politely raised some specific ones of my own. You cannot ignore them and continue to complain about the treatment of creationists by "evolutionists".
MrDarwin is offline  
Old 01-30-2003, 08:57 AM   #52
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 4,140
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Paul
Well I happen to think that all Scientist have something to add
in all fields of Science after all what would a Biologist know about
geology and the Big Bang theory
A vanishingly small percentage of biologists, and only slightly larger percentage of scientists in general, disbelieve in evolution.

A mMuch larger percentage of all scientists doubts the existence of god(s). So what's your point?
MrDarwin is offline  
Old 01-30-2003, 09:23 AM   #53
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Cyprus
Posts: 34
Default

my point is that biologyists maybe the main experts on biological evolution but who are the experts in fossils on which you base a very strong case on.
Paul is offline  
Old 01-30-2003, 10:55 AM   #54
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Washington, the least religious state
Posts: 5,334
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Paul
my point is that biologyists maybe the main experts on biological evolution but who are the experts in fossils on which you base a very strong case on.
I think that they are called paleontologists .



HW
Happy Wonderer is offline  
Old 01-30-2003, 01:00 PM   #55
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 3,095
Default

As Happy Wonderer says, paleontologists. Paleontology is a subfield of geology, which is the study of the Earth. Geology isn't just the study of rocks and minerals, it is a versatile science covering numerous fields and describes essentially the entire phsyical and biological history of the planet. It deals with vast time scales and the 'big picture'. It includes minerology, stratigraphy, paleontology, historical geology, glacial geology, structural geology, the study of all the different types of rocks (clumps of minerals), depositional environments, landform analysis, plate techtonics, etc. It integrates seemlessly with biology, chemistry, and physics. Most undergraduate geology students spend their first two years intensively studying biology, mathematics, chemistry, and physics before tackling the core geology courses.
Selsaral is offline  
Old 01-30-2003, 03:12 PM   #56
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Glendale, Arizona, USA
Posts: 184
Default

The trouble with creationist arguments is that they kind of coalesce around three or four logical fallacies. Once you have pointed out the fallacies and given reducio ad absurdum corrollaries for the arguments, there's really nothing to do but "is so/is not" exchanges, that become very tedious to the point that just to liven things up, ad hominem and gratuitous insults are tempting.

Argument from ignorance. The world (life, brains, eyes, planentary distance, universal constants) is too complex for us to explain. Therefore, it could not be a natural occurance. Therefore: God.

Assumption that propositions about factual matters have moral significance. It is not an empirical question whether life evolved; it is a matter of faith. It is good to believe in god and the bible; it is evil not to believe in god or the bible. God's truth will win out in the end and those without faith who seek natural explanations will be punished.

Ad hoc alternative explanations are equivalent in the power to convince as are observations and findings that mutually support and amplify each other. Billions of gallons of water suddenly created from nothing and just as suddenly vanishing is as good an explanation as that which involves developing dating methods, searching and comparing fossils, measuring differences in DNA molecules from many species of animals, etc.

A rotten apple spoils the barrel. Scientists who commit frauds and hoaxes and other scientists who try to incorporate these falsehoods into evolutionary theory prove that all scientists are frauds and hoaxters.

It would be fun to have some pet creationists on this site whom we coddle and flatter, so they will continue to make asses of themselves for our enjoyment and to feed our egos, but is that really a worthwhile or praiseworthy enterprise?
TerryTryon is offline  
Old 02-03-2003, 03:37 AM   #57
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
Default

Where did Paul go?

Went the way of his god-of-the-gaps, and vanished in a puff of logic, apparently...

DT
Oolon Colluphid is offline  
Old 02-03-2003, 07:37 AM   #58
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: secularcafe.org
Posts: 9,525
Talking

He stood up.

BOOM!

Jobar is offline  
Old 02-04-2003, 09:34 AM   #59
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Execution State, USA
Posts: 5,031
Talking

And this is the neighbor who told us where to find Paul...

BOOM!
The Naked Mage is offline  
Old 02-04-2003, 09:36 AM   #60
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Execution State, USA
Posts: 5,031
Talking

And this is where the neighbor grew up...

WHA-BOOOOOOOOM!

<laughs maniacally>
The Naked Mage is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:53 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.