Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-12-2003, 12:49 PM | #1 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 13,699
|
Opinions and suggestions needed
I received this announcement:
Quote:
1: Do you think that it is constitutional for the public schools to be an official sponsor for this event? 2: Despite this being exclusionary as I see it as only an invitation to people who have a religion, I plan to go and I plan to share with the group what impact religion has in my life. Any suggestions on content? I thought that I would start with the famous George H.W. Bush quote that atheists would not be considered good citizens or patriots because this is one nation under god. Keep in mind that my town is very liberal and over 50% Jewish. |
|
04-12-2003, 01:21 PM | #2 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
My gut feeling is that this is constitutional, especially with the way things have been going lately. The group is not pushing theology or religion. It is promoting interfaith understanding, which contravenes the principles of most of those religions.
All that aside, it wouldn't hurt to challenge the public schools, and ask for equal time for the non-religious point of view, especially if you can find a free thought organization to take part. If fhe Interfaith Action Alliance is the group I am thinking of, they are very good on church state separation. |
04-12-2003, 02:21 PM | #3 | |||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 13,699
|
Quote:
What I find most objectionable is that it will give people the "opportunity to share how their own faith inspires them in their daily lives. " If one has no religion, one is not invited to participate. The school should not be involved in something that only invites religious people to participate. Quote:
I am not aware of any local freethought groups apart for several in Boston. I'm in the suburbs. Quote:
|
|||
04-12-2003, 04:22 PM | #4 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 13,699
|
I had an interesting response. I have decided to go to this event and say my thing.
This is from someone at the school and forwarded to me by the person who sent out the announcement. Quote:
|
|
04-12-2003, 05:09 PM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 1,112
|
Excellent, crazyfingers!
Although I am skeptical of the statement that "all of the organizations ... are riddled with agnostics and atheists ", I certainly wouldn't mind. I know many atheists and agnostics go to church with their families, so who knows? Let us know how it goes. -Jewel |
04-12-2003, 07:24 PM | #6 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Interfaith Alliance
Quote:
|
|
04-12-2003, 07:29 PM | #7 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 13,699
|
The question is, what would be good to say in less than 5 minutes?
|
04-12-2003, 07:42 PM | #8 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 13,699
|
I'm thinking about describing what a weak atheist is, because that's what I am.
Then describing where I get my morals (the Golden Rule) and then give a few examples of the kinds of attitudes atheists face in our theistic culture. Examples: Surveys show that 49% of Americans would not vote for an atheist. George H.W. Bush's statement about atheists not being citizens or patriots. Tom Brokaw on the NBC news a few weeks ago saying that there are "no athists in foxholes." My town is 50% Jewish. Hould Brokaw have been fired if he had said "no Jews in foxholes". I'd like to work Church-State separation in somehow. Perhaps as related to values and the golden rule? |
04-12-2003, 07:52 PM | #9 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Say that you have found you can lead a good, moral life without religion, and that religion often just gets in the way, and that you do not begreudge anyone else their faith, but you hope that they extend their tolerance to those who don't believe in any god(s). Oh and by the way wouldn't the world be a more peaceful place without all these religious wars.
It appears that "Ilan" wants to know how your faith helps you deal with adversity, and you would have to admit that it would be easier if all those Iraqi babies and other collateral damage were just wafted up into heaven instead of dying of malnutrition or bullets, but that we still have to deal with reality and not fantasy. Hoping that a mythological God will come and rescue us or protect us is useless. We have to face the facts and work on peace with our own resources. I wouldn't get into George HW Bush's alleged statement about atheists not being good Americans. It's too much of a diversion, and the current President Bush has been careful not to say anything comparable. Your basic mission (should you choose to accept it) is to show all these good religious liberals that atheists are real people who don't have horns, but do have some social skills. Many of them are in fact atheists or agnostics in their hearts, and only hang around religious groups for social reasons. Some of them may chose to defect to the Evil Atheist Conspiracy. |
04-12-2003, 09:40 PM | #10 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: PA USA
Posts: 5,039
|
Quote:
You might get attention by asking, "Who among us can truly state that he or she believes in atheists? Do YOU believe in atheists?" I've thought of attending a local interfaith function as an atheist just out of curiosity. My aim would be to expose atheism for what it is not. To that end I would want people to come away with the impression that atheism has nothing to do with being immoral, intolerant, unpatriotic, extremist, uppity or anything so stereotypical. Maybe I'd even want folks to try to appreciate the fact that the majority of believers are atheistic to some degree, but that this doesn't make one unable to carry on socially and ethically, or unable to appreciate beauty. I think it could be pulled off very nicely. I consider myself a person of faith but not of religion. I do not see the words "faith" and "religion" as somehow inextricably bound, at least not anymore. And from the link Toto posted, it sounds like such a message would be well received, clergy-sponsored or not. joe |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|