FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-11-2002, 10:34 AM   #1
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 282
Post Pedophile priest policy handed down from the Pope

<a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/844789.asp?vts=121120021110" target="_blank">http://www.msnbc.com/news/844789.asp?vts=121120021110</a>

Words cannot even describe my feelings. I think I'm going to vomit.
enigma555 is offline  
Old 12-11-2002, 12:52 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lost in the Ether, Minnesota
Posts: 1,436
Post

In my opinion (after reading that article.. or at least as much as I could stomach) the pope is now just as guilty as any of these pieces of crap that would do such a thing!
Child molesters and rapists should be punished to the most extreme extent the law provides!
A.K.A capital punishment

So simple

Bear
(edited because my initial response was innapropriate)

[ December 11, 2002: Message edited by: B34RZ0R ]</p>
B34RZ0R is offline  
Old 12-11-2002, 01:16 PM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Post

Bear - I hope you would at least agree that capital punishment could only be administered after due process.

We'd like to discourage threats of violence on the board, even those not directed at particular persons or clearly rhetorical.

The issue here isn't what to do with child molesters. It is the Pope's insensitivity to the issue and his negligence in allowing child abuse to continue. It is highly unlikely that anyone is going to extradite the Pope for aiding and abetting a crime.
Toto is offline  
Old 12-11-2002, 01:21 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lost in the Ether, Minnesota
Posts: 1,436
Post

Of course I left that to be an assumption...
my bad..
B34RZ0R is offline  
Old 12-11-2002, 01:45 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Middle, Kansas
Posts: 2,637
Post

Now that's a great idea. Let's extradite the pope. I love it. Best idea I've heard today.

In all seriousness, and a theoretical exercise, are there any grounds to do it?
dangin is offline  
Old 12-11-2002, 02:28 PM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Post

There's a lawsuit that was filed recently charging the Catholic Church with running a criminal enterprise under RICO.

And we did extradite Noriega to stand trial on drug running. What's more serious, drugs or child rape?
Toto is offline  
Old 12-11-2002, 02:36 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Rolla, Missouri
Posts: 830
Post

Really, it should be quite obvious that the catholic church has no problem with peodophilia. It is based in Rome, and for the longest time pedophilia was a very large part of Roman culture. It was thought to be what people who had power were to have sex with small boys. Perhaps the church is right that pedophilia is our problem, we are opposed to its practice.
PJPSYCO is offline  
Old 12-12-2002, 12:09 AM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Post

This is getting serious.

<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/ap20021210_1151.html" target="_blank">The Roman Catholic Diocese of Manchester averted unprecedented criminal charges, agreeing in a settlement Tuesday that it probably would have been convicted of failing to protect children from sexually abusive priests</a>

Quote:
Showing off Bishop John B. McCormack's signature on the settlement, McLaughlin said: "The diocese acknowledges the state has evidence likely to sustain a conviction" under the state's child endangerment law.
Toto is offline  
Old 12-17-2002, 08:07 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: springfield, MA. USA
Posts: 2,482
Post

Time's short & I can't seem to find here or elsewhere the POPE's appalling comment (I saw in print about the weekend of the 15th).
IF I Am QUOTING HIM CORRECTLY. John Paul II said something blandly approximating that *preventing "scandal* to be overt about (our Holy Mother , my insert) the Church is the really-IMPORTANT thing; and that the (personal) injuries (of mind & body) done to the victims of sexual & other violations are really insignificant.
I never , NEVER heard any cleric state this principle so openly/baldfacedly before. It is breath-taking, is it not? Can anyone alive & conscious now doubt what "the Church"'s priorities really are? Nor doubt either the IDOLATRY of those who adore their own man-made THING?
Vomit, indeed.
abe smith is offline  
Old 12-17-2002, 08:25 AM   #10
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Richmond IN
Posts: 375
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Toto:
<strong>
And we did extradite Noriega to stand trial on drug running. What's more serious, drugs or child rape?</strong>
Actually, I think we sent an armed force to kidnap Noriega. So let your imagination run wild...101st Airborne Division dropping into Vatican City...
beejay is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:46 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.