FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-27-2002, 03:16 PM   #401
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 292
Post

As a substitute, I like to say the Matt Groening version:

I plead alignment to the flake of the untitled snakes of a merry cow. And to the Republicans, for which they scam, one nacho, underpants, invisible with licorice and jugs of wine for owls.

btw, if the ruling gets overturned, I hope that some teacher out there who understands the Constitution will have his class say "one nation under no God" instead to cause controversy. He would have the same right to have them say that as he would to have them say the current pledge. And it sure would piss of the religious right

What probably is the most annoying thing to me is that people are saying that this interfers with the rights of Christians. We've all heard that one before. BTW, I can't wait to see how The Onion handles this one.
Atheist121 is offline  
Old 06-27-2002, 03:20 PM   #402
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,427
Post

There's a (partial) one from Calvin & Hobbes too... I think it starts out something like

I pledge allegiance to Queen Fragg,
And her mighty state of hysteria...
bluefugue is offline  
Old 06-27-2002, 03:22 PM   #403
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: California
Posts: 6,196
Post

I was listening to a local talk show and the host kept insisting on the point that "under god" isn't a religious statement; it's just a usual banal statement--one that has become tradition. She said, "No one is forcing anyone to believe in god for saying the pledge." She went on to say, "People who support this need to get a life and worry about more important things."
Secular Elation is offline  
Old 06-27-2002, 03:25 PM   #404
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,427
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Secular Elation:
<strong>"People who support this need to get a life and worry about more important things."</strong>
There certainly are more important things, but as long as the issue has been raised, we may as well line up where our feelings direct us. And, as long as we are talking about people who need to "get a life," the bozos in Congress who passed this thing 48 years ago come readily to mind...
bluefugue is offline  
Old 06-27-2002, 03:27 PM   #405
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,198
Unhappy

Quote:
Originally posted by Secular Elation:
<strong>She went on to say, "People who support this need to get a life and worry about more important things."</strong>
I wish all the fundies (and hell, the rest of 'em) making a tizzy over this would take some of their own advice. I mean, if it's so "unimportant," why is it being condemned? Why did Congress act so quickly? Why do *they* all care?

--W@L
Writer@Large is offline  
Old 06-27-2002, 03:32 PM   #406
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: a place where i can list whatever location i want
Posts: 4,871
Angry

Quote:
Judge Alfred Goodwin was the author of the 2-1 ruling calling the phrase “under God” unconstitutional. He has now stayed his decision,
Yes, this is the one whose phone number Faux News sprayed across the screen. I wonder who's going to call them on that?
GunnerJ is offline  
Old 06-27-2002, 03:40 PM   #407
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 11
Post

Excitment - the freethinkers of this country have taken a huge step. But what are the Christians going to do? Something big from them is going to happen, it's just that no one knows what.
uprise is offline  
Old 06-27-2002, 03:44 PM   #408
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 891
Post

Quote:
Rimstalker posted:
Yes, this is the one whose phone number Faux News sprayed across the screen. I wonder who's going to call them on that?
Can we get the home phone numbers of Roger Ailes and Sean Hannity?
BibleBelted is offline  
Old 06-27-2002, 03:46 PM   #409
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: gone
Posts: 3,953
Exclamation

Just a petty, self-serving request.

In an earlier message, I stated that only 4.35% of people voting on my local station's poll about the pledge supported the ruling. So I asked people to stop and vote if they got the chance.

I'd like to ask again, this time with a link. I'd love to skew some statistics in this heavily fundamentalist area. This particular station has been very pro-"under God" and hasn't made much attempt at impartiality, and it would be immensely satisfying to me if their numbers were tremendously out of line with those of other stations in the area.

You can find the poll here, at WFMY2.com <a href="http://www.wfmy2.com" target="_blank">WFMY</a>

Thanks,

Chuck
Chuck is offline  
Old 06-27-2002, 03:49 PM   #410
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 891
Post

Chuck Fristians posted:

Quote:
Just a petty, self-serving request
Done did it (as we say down here)!

It was up to almost 20% by the time I hit it.
BibleBelted is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:04 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.