Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
06-18-2003, 06:04 AM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 4,140
|
Here are two more news stories on it:
Biblical Inscription Ruled a Forgery Burial Box Not from Jesus Brother -Israeli Experts |
06-18-2003, 06:27 AM | #3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the land of two boys and no sleep.
Posts: 9,890
|
Everyone's on this story it seems. I was just coming to post the same thing.
This excerpt provides a great bit of info on how such conclusions are drawn: Quote:
|
|
06-18-2003, 07:03 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,490
|
oops. double post. I have more trouble with II telling me it is too busy to post, etc... Are you guys having problems?
|
06-18-2003, 07:06 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,490
|
I leaned toward the authenticity of the James Ossuary inscription because of the heavy scholarly weight behind it. It looks as if some of us may have to change our minds. However, I'm not sure about others, but I will be looking into who was on the committee to see if I should believe their verdict any more than that of the other excellent scholars who have weighed in on the debate. I would also like to see the actual IAA report.
One thing that bothers me is that there is at least one scholar and maybe more on this committee who post to the ANE list and were rather vehemently decrying the ossuary inscription before the committe even began its investigation. Could it be that preconceived notions influenced the group? I don't know, but I'm interested. Vorkosigan, can you now share some of what you were told about the whole affair and by whom? Here is one of the best sources I have found so far (IAA seems to have nothing on their website!) and it appears to mention the scholars involved: Archaeology Magazine Other news agencies are mixing up information about the JI and the JO... Be careful. I believe this is one of those mixups... " "The inscription appears new, written in modernity by someone attempting to reproduce ancient written characters," the officials said in the statement." from CNN story |
06-18-2003, 07:30 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, oregon, usa
Posts: 1,190
|
IAA adjudges James ossuary inscription a fake
http://www.archaeology.org/magazine..../ossuary/index
It looks like Shanks and Witherington are hawking a holy relic, just like the multiple Jesus foreskins, splinters of the True Cross, and snippets of the robe. <snort> They shall have to go back to their search for the holy grail. Chastened, I hope. Anybody got any other perspectives on this that I might not be seeing? godfry |
06-18-2003, 07:42 AM | #7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
|
An excellent article godfry. James Bond. Heh heh heh.
Joel P.S. I think I'll merge your thread with Mortal Wombat's. |
06-18-2003, 07:46 AM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 2,467
|
Hmm...anyone think that retractions will be printed/aired with the same publicity as the announcements? I have entirely lost what little respect I might have had for the Discovery channel after their specials.
|
06-18-2003, 07:51 AM | #9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
|
Quote:
Joel |
|
06-18-2003, 07:53 AM | #10 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, oregon, usa
Posts: 1,190
|
Quote:
godfry |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|