FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-15-2003, 07:27 PM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 602
Default Better to be christian captive in Islam.

A story in the recent issue of Freethought Today, January/February 2003, by Captain David Horn, USAF, F16 fighter pilot, is quite interesting. He was involved in the Afghan War. He is an agnostic by his description but crossing the line over to Atheism. American military personnel wear metal I.D. tags called Dog Tags. These contain name and brief information including religious preference. After a long fight a number of years ago, freethinkers won the "right" to list "no preference" or "none" in the religious preference spot.

In the Afghan War, the enemy were/are a very barmy, indeed almost psychotically fanatical religious group, the Taliban. Many worried over what would happen to a soldier or pilot captured by the Taliban if their Dog Tags said, "Jewish", "Christian", or "None".

"Jewish" was obviously and invitation to be executed on the spot, there was some worry about "Christians" the majority by 88%. Then apparently the military got information that captive allied soldiers found to be Atheists or Agnostics would be very badly treated. Many had new tags with "Christian" put on them under the impressiong that as Christians they would be spared but Agnostics and Jews might be summarily executed by the insane Musliim wankers.

Perhaps it should serve as a warning to all of us travelling in Muslim countries voluntarily, to rethink their travel plans.

Fiach
Fiach is offline  
Old 02-15-2003, 07:44 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lancaster, PA/Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 627
Default

Personally, I've found my Muslim friends to be far more tolerant than my xtian ones. This is not to say that it's smart for anyone to be traveling in Afghanistan right now, of course, but I don't think that just anybody over there would execute you on the spot for your religious preference. Use a little force to convert you, maybe, but hey, they wouldn't be the only ones...
Strawberry is offline  
Old 02-16-2003, 06:26 AM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Nowhere Land
Posts: 441
Default

better to be no one's captive
Rousseau_CHN is offline  
Old 02-16-2003, 04:09 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 2,144
Default

My [atheist] friend's [atheist] father was working in Pakistan, and he packed a bible in his luggage.
never been there is offline  
Old 02-16-2003, 05:21 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Portland OR USA
Posts: 1,098
Default

Are these stories of what they thought would happen to people, or are there actual occurences known of people being treated differently based on what their dog tag said?
oriecat is offline  
Old 02-16-2003, 08:04 PM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 602
Default He was apparently was advised.

Quote:
Originally posted by oriecat
Are these stories of what they thought would happen to people, or are there actual occurences known of people being treated differently based on what their dog tag said?
Apparently someone higher in command than the Captain, (example, the theatre commander) advised them. I am not sure if he knew of something or not. Intuitively since the Muslims rant so much against Christians so much, and bomb Christian churches in Pakistan and machine gun Christian congregations, I would have thought that Christian was not a good label to wear.

So, to make such a recommendation, and actually suggest that Atheists fake being christians to survive, suggests that something or someone knew information to lead to that. In his article Capt. Horn said that "someone told him."

Why doesn't the American military teach all of their soldiers a few verses from the Qur'an in Arabic and punch "Islamic" on their dog tags, and learn to shout "Allahu akbar" ?

Fiach
Fiach is offline  
Old 02-16-2003, 09:17 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Portland OR USA
Posts: 1,098
Default

Or why put anything about religion on there at all? What does it have to do with being in the military?? I can understand having a tag with name, rank, outfit, etc. Exactly why does religion figure into it at all? Especially if they know that it could be used against the soldier if captured!
oriecat is offline  
Old 02-17-2003, 12:59 PM   #8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hell, New York
Posts: 151
Default Re: Better to be christian captive in Islam.

Quote:
Originally posted by Fiach
A story in the recent issue of Freethought Today, January/February 2003, by Captain David Horn, USAF, F16 fighter pilot, is quite interesting. He was involved in the Afghan War. He is an agnostic by his description but crossing the line over to Atheism. American military personnel wear metal I.D. tags called Dog Tags. These contain name and brief information including religious preference. After a long fight a number of years ago, freethinkers won the "right" to list "no preference" or "none" in the religious preference spot.

In the Afghan War, the enemy were/are a very barmy, indeed almost psychotically fanatical religious group, the Taliban. Many worried over what would happen to a soldier or pilot captured by the Taliban if their Dog Tags said, "Jewish", "Christian", or "None".

"Jewish" was obviously and invitation to be executed on the spot, there was some worry about "Christians" the majority by 88%. Then apparently the military got information that captive allied soldiers found to be Atheists or Agnostics would be very badly treated. Many had new tags with "Christian" put on them under the impressiong that as Christians they would be spared but Agnostics and Jews might be summarily executed by the insane Musliim wankers.

Perhaps it should serve as a warning to all of us travelling in Muslim countries voluntarily, to rethink their travel plans.

Fiach
From what I've seen, they prefer SOME theism over NONE. Like most...
Aerik Von is offline  
Old 02-17-2003, 09:02 PM   #9
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 602
Default The original purpose

Quote:
Originally posted by oriecat
Or why put anything about religion on there at all? What does it have to do with being in the military?? I can understand having a tag with name, rank, outfit, etc. Exactly why does religion figure into it at all? Especially if they know that it could be used against the soldier if captured!
It was put on originally so that a chaplain appropriate to the soldier's beliefs could be called to officiate at funeral arrangements far from home or such things as last rights or last confession for catholics.

My suggestion for the designation for non-theists: "worshipper of Jennifer Lopez."

Fiach
Fiach is offline  
Old 02-18-2003, 08:20 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: SoCal USA
Posts: 7,737
Default

Actually, this has been going on for a long time. When I enlisted way back when (1991), I was told that I could put whatever I wanted on my dog tag, but that it would be a good idea to at least put something on there. The thinking goes that if captured, you're better off being perceived as a believer of some sort, rather than just a pure evil infidel. So I put "Baptist" on mine.
HaysooChreesto! is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:30 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.