Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-12-2002, 03:33 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 913
|
Quote:
|
|
04-12-2002, 04:42 PM | #12 |
Moderator - Science Discussions
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Providence, RI, USA
Posts: 9,908
|
The young-earth arguments you mention all come from a list by creationist Russell Humphreys--here's a site which debunks each of them in turn:
<a href="http://www.adam.com.au/bstett/ReligAntiquityofEarth.htm" target="_blank">http://www.adam.com.au/bstett/ReligAntiquityofEarth.htm</a> Also, you might be interested in a back-and-forth I had with AiG about Humphreys' list, which you can see near the middle of p. 2 of <a href="http://www.arn.org/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=000860;p=2" target="_blank">this</a> arn.org thread...I referenced some additional useful websites there as well. [ April 12, 2002: Message edited by: Jesse ]</p> |
04-13-2002, 10:44 AM | #13 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dana Point, Ca, USA
Posts: 2,115
|
Thanks Jesse. I found some good information in one of your arn posts on sodium/cloride ratios that is helpful in the debunking of Wells' Icons... Chp. 2 that I am working on (and off).
BTW, Dalrymple, G. Brent, 1991 The Age of the Earth Stanford: Stanford University Press easily dispells items 3,4,8, and 9 from the list of creationist sillyness at the top of the tread. And, there are individual articles on just about every list item here: <a href="http://home.austarnet.com.au/stear/default.htm" target="_blank">No Answers in Gensis</a> [ April 13, 2002: Message edited by: Dr.GH ] Oh, and what is "injected sandstone?" DB_Hunter seems to know, but it is a new one on me, and it seems impossible. I have a short article on "intrusive basalt" and creationist misinterpretation of geology here: <a href="http://home.austarnet.com.au/stear/a_dump_on_aig's_tas_walker.htm" target="_blank">Dubious Diluvium</a> [ April 13, 2002: Message edited by: Dr.GH ]</p> |
04-13-2002, 02:42 PM | #14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Posts: 1,128
|
Sand injection is quite common, and is basically fluidisation and remobilisation of previously deposited sands. It can result in sand bodies of tens of meters thick and hundreds of meters wide, injected in surrounding mudstones. They form attractive exploration targets in the North Sea and other areas. A nice example in outcrop is this one:
What this has to do with proving a young Earth is totally beyond me, but then, most creationist arguments are.... fG (Edited to say: BTW, Dr GH, this example is from Santa Cruz, Monterey Bay - is that anywhere near where you live? ) Also, if you want to know more, a website on sand injection research is <a href="http://www.abdn.ac.uk/geology/profiles/turbidites/injected/isghome.html" target="_blank"> this one from Aberdeen University </a>. [ April 13, 2002: Message edited by: faded_Glory ]</p> |
04-17-2002, 10:34 AM | #15 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,504
|
Quote:
Peez |
|
04-17-2002, 10:37 AM | #16 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,504
|
Thanks to everyone for the information!
Peez |
04-17-2002, 10:58 AM | #17 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 64
|
Quote:
|
|
04-17-2002, 12:17 PM | #18 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 235
|
Quote:
|
|
04-18-2002, 07:33 AM | #19 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,504
|
Quote:
Peez |
|
04-18-2002, 07:52 AM | #20 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 235
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|