FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-16-2003, 04:20 PM   #11
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
Default

Quote:
Yeah, but then you'll have to worry about going blind
left eye: 20/1100
right eye: 20/900

kept me from getting sent to the Vietnam War, though!
Coragyps is offline  
Old 07-16-2003, 06:57 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Posts: 503
Default

I know this is going to sound stupid, but someone told me masturbating once a day can cause serious health problems becaue the body keeps trying to produce more sperm and it throws the body out of its natural balance. This isn't true is it? Because if it is I'm screwed
Jake
SimplyAtheistic is offline  
Old 07-16-2003, 07:19 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 4,930
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by JakeJohnson
I know this is going to sound stupid, but someone told me masturbating once a day can cause serious health problems becaue the body keeps trying to produce more sperm and it throws the body out of its natural balance. This isn't true is it? Because if it is I'm screwed
Jake
Nope. Not true. You're fine, whack away.

(I am curious as to what they meant by "natural balance", anyway. It's one of those hippie-dippy substance-free catchphrases, like "cleanse the body of toxins." Silly.)
RevDahlia is offline  
Old 07-16-2003, 09:00 PM   #14
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: El Paso Tx
Posts: 66
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by JakeJohnson
I know this is going to sound stupid, but someone told me masturbating once a day can cause serious health problems becaue the body keeps trying to produce more sperm and it throws the body out of its natural balance. This isn't true is it? Because if it is I'm screwed
Jake
Seriously that is one of the silliest things I've ever heard. Your body produces the same amount of sperm all the time. All you would gain by not jerking off is more sperm stored up. Well callous free hands and a lot of pent up tension.
T. E. Lords is offline  
Old 07-17-2003, 02:06 AM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,834
Default Somebody has to say it.

...but what about the kittens?!?!

*ducks and runs*
Worldtraveller is offline  
Old 07-17-2003, 03:20 AM   #16
DBT
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: ɹǝpunuʍop puɐן ǝɥʇ
Posts: 17,906
Default

Then there is the opposite view, years ago I was looking through a book on Tantric sexual practices,I can't remember it clearly,
in one exercise the practitioner is allowed unlimited sexual activity but no ejaculation!
I think their idea was that it dissipates energy,so they keep it in and supposedly channel it into other areas.I think the practice has a long history in India.
I wonder if this practice would cause health problems?
DBT is offline  
Old 07-17-2003, 09:19 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 1,840
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by DBT9522
Then there is the opposite view, years ago I was looking through a book on Tantric sexual practices,I can't remember it clearly,
in one exercise the practitioner is allowed unlimited sexual activity but no ejaculation!
I think their idea was that it dissipates energy,so they keep it in and supposedly channel it into other areas.I think the practice has a long history in India.

Its called Maithuna. Its based on superstition. The idea is that you build up the sacred seed to either awaken the kundalini in the spine or open the sahashara chakra in the head or some other claptrap. While I wholeheartedly endorse with the idea of a religion based on sexual pleasure, maithuna is just delibate sexual frustration with no benefits. It probably won't damage you, but it may well lead to a painful bout of vasocongestion.

Patrick
ps418 is offline  
Old 07-17-2003, 10:26 AM   #18
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Folding@Home in upstate NY
Posts: 14,394
Arrow

Quote:
Originally posted by john_v_h
Let's give a big hand to the Aussie researchers who made this important discovery.
Just one hand, though!

Quote:
Originally posted by ps418
Yeah, but then you'll have to worry about going blind
Left eye: 20/15
Right eye: 20/17

Guess that blows (no pun intended) that theory!
Shake is offline  
Old 07-17-2003, 10:29 AM   #19
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Folding@Home in upstate NY
Posts: 14,394
Arrow Re: Somebody has to say it.

Quote:
Originally posted by Worldtraveler
...but what about the kittens?!?!

*ducks and runs*
Somebody had to post it!
Shake is offline  
Old 07-17-2003, 10:38 AM   #20
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Folding@Home in upstate NY
Posts: 14,394
Default Re: Re: Somebody has to say it.

Quote:
Originally posted by Shake
Somebody had to post it!
D'OH! Stupid flood control! I forgot to reattach the file! Here it is!
Shake is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:27 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.