Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-17-2002, 11:06 AM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 301
|
What does agnosticism offer?
Since we're on the topic of atheism and theism.
Atheism being the default position when born, but theism has the chance to take over. Nobody has a definative answer. Theists place god in places that others cannot get to. Atheism can't prove god doesn't exist with science as of yet. I myself do not have the true answers as an agnostic. I can only listen and talk about my beliefs in order to find what is the most logical belief. I guess I ask more questions then I do give answers. I tend to be more on the atheists side for their logic and reason which leads to better understanding. Theism isn't winning me over anytime soon. Hundreds of religions not knowing the true answer and relying on faith to justify it. Should one pick a side, or is agnosticism the best choice? |
07-17-2002, 12:03 PM | #2 |
Talk Freethought Staff
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Toronto, eh
Posts: 42,293
|
Rely on your own instinct.
If you have faith that God exists, no amount of logical reasoning is going to convince you otherwise. If it's your logical conclusion is that God doesn't exist, no amount of appeals that you should have faith are going to sway you. None of us operates in a intellectual vaccuum and any answers that you choose to accept are based on your worldview. Read the arguments people make in these forums and you'll see what I mean. The fact that you have more questions than answers is a good thing. Once you start having answers on a subject means you've stopped thinking about that subject. Don't pick a side for the sake of picking a side. Until one camp or the other can sway you with it's reasoning, stay an agnostic and keep asking questions. [ July 17, 2002: Message edited by: peteyh ]</p> |
07-17-2002, 12:36 PM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,777
|
In my opinion, nothing.
|
07-17-2002, 01:11 PM | #4 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: .
Posts: 467
|
Why not both?
Try looking at propositions in degrees of probability: E.g., after examining the evidence for "Earth Gods", I have concluded that their existence is highly improbable--hence a near atheistic position. As for an unknown entity that "might" be a God or Gods "somewhere" in the Universe, well, since there is currently no good way to test this proposition, I would have to suspend my judgment--hence agnostic. Less filling, tastes great! |
07-17-2002, 01:39 PM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 3,568
|
You shouldn't tell yourself that you need to decide one way or the other if you don't feel that you have enough information to do so. It's okay to say "I don't know."
|
07-17-2002, 02:09 PM | #6 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,777
|
Quote:
[ July 17, 2002: Message edited by: ReasonableDoubt ]</p> |
|
07-17-2002, 03:15 PM | #7 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 301
|
agnostic:
One who believes that it is impossible to know whether there is a God. One who is skeptical about the existence of God but does not profess true atheism. I would replace the word "God" with "a Creator". And that pretty much sums up my views as an agnostic. I mean the deities made by humanity do not make any sense. If a deity is incomprehensible, there is no damn way any of us will know the attributes that make up this deity. The bible is just contradiction after contradiction and even with faith I could not believe in it. Now on the other hand.. the universes creation is an unknown. Perhaps it wasn't created, but just exists. As an agnostic I will keep my mind open to any possibility. I view the information presented from both sides and disect it, and mold it into my own theories. I don't believe in religion, but there could be a creator. Armed with science, logic, reason, and intuition I hope to find answers. I do not look for pride, or wish to join a side. I just want the truth. |
07-17-2002, 04:42 PM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: secularcafe.org
Posts: 9,525
|
Although this is an interesting topic, I don't think it is an EoG topic. MRD.
|
07-18-2002, 04:25 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 812
|
I am glad you posed the question because there are many wannabe agnostics out there. In a strictly philosophical context, I agree with dark bronze that it is ok to approach debate and discussion from a nutural position. Otherwise, the dynamics of the mind sort of senses or reacts in a mode of shut-down, if you know what I mean here. The short answer IMO is that the agnostic 'approach' works better in feeding philosphical fodder.
Walrus |
07-18-2002, 06:20 AM | #10 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 301
|
At least as an agnostic, I can concede the fact that if there is a god, we probably won't find it.
All we could possibly find is gods work. But from that theism has molded this into their own interpretation of existence and the purpose for all, abusing this unknown for power over the people. So many religions exist as to maintain this power. I cannot become an atheist or theist in the sense I'm not perfect, and do not know why or how anything exists. WJ: I guess you could say as an agnostic, I can approach philosophy with a clear mind, open to all. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|