FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-06-2002, 01:47 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the dark places of the world
Posts: 8,093
Talking Woo-hoo! I got banned!

Over on the BaptistBoard (www.baptistboard.com).

Truth hurts.
Sauron is offline  
Old 02-06-2002, 02:37 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Lincoln, England
Posts: 1,499
Smile

Did you type god with a lower case 'g' or something?
Huginn is offline  
Old 02-06-2002, 02:42 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 808
Post

I would consider that a complement.
Christopher Lord is offline  
Old 02-06-2002, 03:23 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the dark places of the world
Posts: 8,093
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Huginn:
<strong>Did you type god with a lower case 'g' or something?</strong>
I said:
  • John Ashcroft was wrong for using taxpayer money( $8,600) to put drapes over naked statues, and that we taxpayers shouldn't be paying for his religious beliefs;
  • Palestinians shouldn't give up their homes just because "god's word" says that the Jews have a right to the land;
  • an unplanned pregnancy is a devastating thing to someone's life;
  • that gay adoption was in fact endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics;

    etc.

And asked some embarrassing questions, such as:

which is better for the child:
a. to grow up in a gay home, or
b. to spend their young life in an orphanage, and never be placed in a home at all?


But what got me banned (I think) was this one:
Quote:
By its nature, fundamentalism rejects evidence, fact and rationality. It relies instead on rules, which are inflexible. People drawn to fundamentalism prefer that; it removes the uncertainty associated with having to work through moral problems. It also gives them the certainty that they crave, the assurance that makes them feel better.

But what if their interpretation of these rules is incorrect?

Because they are a fundamentalist, there is no way to exit the infinite loop - no way to inform that person that they're making a mistake. They can't discover it themselves, because they don't trust their own ability to reason and decide things. Other people cannot tell them, because outsiders are suspicious and might be from "the enemy". Their own religion isn't going to provide the correction; if it could do that, they wouldn't be in error in the first place.

They're stuck. With exit doors all around them, they're totally stuck.

By accepting fundamentalism, they have placed themselves in a "logic-proof box" with no way to detect error or deliberate deceit.

Churches are not the problem.
Fundamentalism is the problem.
[ February 06, 2002: Message edited by: Omnedon1 ]</p>
Sauron is offline  
Old 02-06-2002, 04:55 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Dunmanifestin, Discworld
Posts: 4,836
Post

lol, I hope you weren't very surprised.
elwoodblues is offline  
Old 02-06-2002, 05:34 PM   #6
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Execution State, USA
Posts: 5,031
Thumbs up

Well-said, by the way!
The Naked Mage is offline  
Old 02-06-2002, 05:43 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
Post

I agree. Well said.

-RvFvS
RufusAtticus is offline  
Old 02-07-2002, 11:36 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
Post

I noticed that they locked the Pediatrican thread, as I phrophesied. (http://www.baptistboard.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=18&t=000166)

Worship me, mortals. I have the gift!

-RvFvS, The seer of Georgia

[ February 07, 2002: Message edited by: RufusAtticus ]</p>
RufusAtticus is offline  
Old 02-10-2002, 08:35 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 4,369
Post

Very well said. So much so that I think its worth holding onto.
emphryio is offline  
Old 02-23-2002, 12:26 PM   #10
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: out there
Posts: 140
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Omnedon1:
<strong>

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By its nature, fundamentalism rejects evidence, fact and rationality. It relies instead on rules, which are inflexible. People drawn to fundamentalism prefer that; it removes the uncertainty associated with having to work through moral problems. It also gives them the certainty that they crave, the assurance that makes them feel better.
But what if their interpretation of these rules is incorrect?

Because they are a fundamentalist, there is no way to exit the infinite loop - no way to inform that person that they're making a mistake. They can't discover it themselves, because they don't trust their own ability to reason and decide things. Other people cannot tell them, because outsiders are suspicious and might be from "the enemy". Their own religion isn't going to provide the correction; if it could do that, they wouldn't be in error in the first place.

They're stuck. With exit doors all around them, they're totally stuck.

By accepting fundamentalism, they have placed themselves in a "logic-proof box" with no way to detect error or deliberate deceit.

Churches are not the problem.
Fundamentalism is the problem.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[ February 06, 2002: Message edited by: Omnedon1 ]</strong>

I found this quite profound but was late to read it so therefore I *bump*. Well Said!
AJ the greek is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:06 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.