Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-22-2002, 03:17 PM | #1 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 214
|
introns = instructive fractal patterns?
check it out:
<a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2002/11/21/jnkdna.DTL" target="_blank">http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2002/11/21/jnkdna.DTL</a> Quote:
I think i'm about to do an honours project which is aiming to explain the same thing (whether introns actually do something) - I think this hypothesis is far more likely - from my honours handbook: Quote:
|
||
11-22-2002, 03:37 PM | #2 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 9,747
|
Quote:
As for that dude's claims, I don't think I'll be investing in his company. theyeti |
|
11-22-2002, 04:05 PM | #3 |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
|
"In a provisional patent application" - that's kind of cute. A provisional costs you $80, and is anything whatsoever you want to put on a piece of paper and send along, with the proper cover sheet, to the Patent and Trademark Office. They will put it in a file, without looking at it at all, for a year. A provisional's only function is to hold the inventor's "place in line" for that year while he/she checks the waters to see if it's worth the $3000 and up to file a utility patent. One does, however, let the inventor legally say, "Patent pending."
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|