Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Genghis Pwn · 06-19-2003, 01:08 AM

This picture is not obscene. It is 100% legal. Simply a picture of a pretty young girl. Is there anything "morally" wrong with looking at this photo? The answer is no. But watch the irrational accusations fly...

[removed photo, pescifish]

Jinto · 06-19-2003, 01:41 AM

Didst thou have a point, or was this just an excuse to post a picture of a woman in a short skirt?

Genghis Pwn · 06-19-2003, 01:49 AM

The point is to ask forum members whether they find anything "morally wrong" with this photo, in any way. This forum is for discussing moral issues, right?

pescifish · 06-19-2003, 01:54 AM

Genghis Pwn, as I suggested in the other forum, a serious discussion regarding the morality of the photo starts with a serious opening argument or ethical question. I apologize if my post in ~~E~~ did not make this more clear and you have stumbled upon this error under the wrong impression from my suggestion.

Once again, this picture is removed as it appears to me that you are, as Jinto suggests, merely using this as another opportunity to post provocative photos.

If you choose to open a serious discussion of morality, I suggest you do so by describing an ethical situation. Also, read the rules for MF&P found in the sticky thread of this forum. You do not need to post a photo or give overly detailed descriptions in order to pose a moral question.

Consider this an official admin warning: cease and desist the trollish practice of posting photos of possibly underage scantily clad girls in provocative poses on this board. To continue to do can jeopardize your posting privileges at IIDB.

Thank you,

pescifish, Administrator

06-19-2003, 01:08 AM	#1
Genghis Pwn Banned Join Date: May 2003 Location: Spain Posts: 168	Is there anything "wrong" with this photo? This picture is not obscene. It is 100% legal. Simply a picture of a pretty young girl. Is there anything "morally" wrong with looking at this photo? The answer is no. But watch the irrational accusations fly... [removed photo, pescifish]

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

06-19-2003, 01:41 AM	#2
Jinto Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: SLC, UT Posts: 957	Didst thou have a point, or was this just an excuse to post a picture of a woman in a short skirt?

06-19-2003, 01:49 AM	#3
Genghis Pwn Banned Join Date: May 2003 Location: Spain Posts: 168	The point is to ask forum members whether they find anything "morally wrong" with this photo, in any way. This forum is for discussing moral issues, right?

06-19-2003, 01:54 AM	#4
pescifish Beloved Deceased Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: rural part of los angeles, CA Posts: 4,516	Genghis Pwn, as I suggested in the other forum, a serious discussion regarding the morality of the photo starts with a serious opening argument or ethical question. I apologize if my post in ~~E~~ did not make this more clear and you have stumbled upon this error under the wrong impression from my suggestion. Once again, this picture is removed as it appears to me that you are, as Jinto suggests, merely using this as another opportunity to post provocative photos. If you choose to open a serious discussion of morality, I suggest you do so by describing an ethical situation. Also, read the rules for MF&P found in the sticky thread of this forum. You do not need to post a photo or give overly detailed descriptions in order to pose a moral question. Consider this an official admin warning: cease and desist the trollish practice of posting photos of possibly underage scantily clad girls in provocative poses on this board. To continue to do can jeopardize your posting privileges at IIDB. Thank you, pescifish, Administrator

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.