FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-13-2003, 11:17 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 1,336
Default I saw this in the comics today...

I was reading the Wizard of Id on the sunday comics today, and it has one character saying that he couldn't find the phrase "separation of church and state" anywhere in the Constitution. The lawyer nearby says that it's because it doesn't exist. I don't get it, but it scares me. Does this guy thing we're stupid? It's in the Bill of Rights, not the Constitution! What do you think?

I know that this could be in the popular culture section, but the separation thing really ticks me off.
rfwu is offline  
Old 07-13-2003, 11:59 PM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Uh - the Bill of Rights is part of the Constitution.

The Wizard of Id is written by Brant Parker and Johnny Hart. Johnny Hart is a born-again Christian who works Christian themes into his B.C. comic.

That comic is not online yet, but I have been told that in the punch line the lawyer asks if you want the king to be running your church, which sounds like the dawning of appreciation of church state separation.
Toto is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 01:03 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,038
Default

Well the actual phrase isn't in the constitution, I believe it was from a letter by Thomas Jefferson. But the Establishment Clause (pretty much "The government wont promote a religion, or restrict the exercise of any") is right in there.
dirkduck is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 04:42 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 1,112
Default

IIRC, James Madison also used the phrase to describe what the First Amendment meant.
Jewel is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 05:16 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,107
Default

The phrase first appears n 1802 in Jefferson's wrote letter to the Danbury, CT, Baptists. President Jefferson was responding to a complaint that Danbury citizens, regardless of religion, were required to pay taxes to support the Congregational Church. He refers to the Esrablishment Clause as "building a wall if seaparation between church and state".

http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/9806/danpre.html

I have encountered simpletons who parrot the fact that the phrase isn't in the Constitution without a clue as to its origins or -- more importantly -- the rationale for it. There were, at the time, still vestiges of colonial theocracies in New England. Adams's home town, Braintree, Massachusetts, was still levying a church tax at this time as well.
Oresta is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 05:48 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North Hollywood, CA
Posts: 6,303
Default

Well maybe there is no separation of Church and State in the Kingdom of Id. After all, the King is a fink.
Arken is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 06:02 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lancaster, OH
Posts: 1,792
Default

Of course, the "Holy Trinity" isn't in the Bible either.
GaryP is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 06:53 AM   #8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Richmond IN
Posts: 375
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Toto


That comic is not online yet, but I have been told that in the punch line the lawyer asks if you want the king to be running your church, which sounds like the dawning of appreciation of church state separation.
I think the following link will let you get to the comic (select 7/13 date)

Wizard of Id comics for last 30 days

With the punchline, it certainly seems that it supports the separation of church and state, even though that phrase is not in the Constitution.
beejay is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 03:16 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Raleigh, NC
Posts: 959
Default

I think you all need to read that again. The only thing the lawyer didn't like was the king messing around in the church. That says nothing for the opposite side of the argument.
lowmagnet is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 04:10 PM   #10
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Richmond IN
Posts: 375
Default

Some people support the separation because they don't want the church running the government; others don't want the government running the church.

I think the comic points out to the religious that there is a benefit to them in the separation.

But maybe I'm too optimistic...
beejay is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:12 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.