FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-29-2003, 03:38 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orion Arm of the Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 3,092
Default Little Creationist Survival Kit

This one could go either here in evolution/creation, but it could just as easily go in humor.

Little Creationist Survival Kit is funny because it is so true.

Here is its first entry:

Quote:
1. A.Prove that evolution is not science because it is not falsifiable.
Quote Popper's words.
B.Try to prove that evolution is false using any chance you can get.
Valentine Pontifex is offline  
Old 01-29-2003, 04:00 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 9,747
Default

K.A.Tikkanen has a lousy grasp of grammer.

Pretty funny though.

But not as good as The Quixotic Message.

theyeti
theyeti is offline  
Old 01-29-2003, 04:21 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Acton, MA USA
Posts: 1,230
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by theyeti
K.A.Tikkanen has a lousy grasp of grammer.
He's a Finn. He does a h**l of a lot better in English than I would in Finnish.
JonF is offline  
Old 01-29-2003, 05:20 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: US east coast. And www.theroyalforums.com
Posts: 2,829
Default

Quote:
III.This Whale is just distinctive line not contradiction with creation.
I just became extinct.
You did, did you? Well, thank the IPU for that.
Albion is offline  
Old 01-29-2003, 06:17 PM   #5
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: City of Dis
Posts: 496
Default

Just as good is number 2:

Quote:
  • 2.A.Show that God is necessary to explain to world because Constants in nature must be exact. Physicist have shown that even minor change in gravitation speed of light etc. would have made life impossible
  • 2.B.Show that radiodating proof of "4.5 billion years old earth and stars" can wrong because we are not sure of physical constancy during time. Constants constancy haven't proved. So earth could be 6000 years old.
:banghead:
BrotherMan is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:27 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.