FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-06-2002, 05:12 PM   #11
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 423
Post

He'll never be able to listen to his frogs again...
Egoinos is offline  
Old 12-06-2002, 05:14 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: .
Posts: 1,281
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by pz:
<strong>
Um, the croaking noise is the frog's way of saying "NOOOOOOO!", so what's going on in there is homosexual rape.

Seriously. One way we sex frogs is to pick them up by pinching them just behind the forelimbs. To them, it feels like another frog clasping them in amplexus. Male frogs protest by croaking, while the females sit quietly.

It's not a gay bathhouse you've got there -- it's Oz.</strong>
LOL
Kinross is offline  
Old 12-06-2002, 09:34 PM   #13
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 403
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Kind Bud:
<strong>

I don't know. Why don't you ask this question about left-handedness instead of homosexuality? Then we'd have an even better idea of where you're going with this line of questions.

Or you could just come right out and say what's on your mind. My take on homosexuality is that it is extremely similar to left-handedness on a moral, societal and behavioral level.</strong>
JusticeMachine is offline  
Old 12-06-2002, 09:37 PM   #14
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 403
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Kind Bud:
<strong>

I don't know. Why don't you ask this question about left-handedness instead of homosexuality? Then we'd have an even better idea of where you're going with this line of questions.

Or you could just come right out and say what's on your mind. My take on homosexuality is that it is extremely similar to left-handedness on a moral, societal and behavioral level.</strong>
An interesting view, so if homosexuality is similar to left-handedness, is it, like left-handedness, gentically past down from parents to their offsping?

I the homosexual gene dominate or recessive?
JusticeMachine is offline  
Old 12-06-2002, 09:39 PM   #15
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 403
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Kind Bud:
<strong>

I don't know. Why don't you ask this question about left-handedness instead of homosexuality? Then we'd have an even better idea of where you're going with this line of questions.

Or you could just come right out and say what's on your mind. My take on homosexuality is that it is extremely similar to left-handedness on a moral, societal and behavioral level.</strong>
An interesting view, so if homosexuality is similar to left-handedness, is it, like left-handedness, gentically past down from parents to their offsping?

Is the homosexual gene dominate or recessive?
JusticeMachine is offline  
Old 12-06-2002, 09:47 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Indiana
Posts: 932
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by JusticeMachine:
<strong>

An interesting view, so if homosexuality is similar to left-handedness, is it, like left-handedness, gentically past down from parents to their offsping?

Is the homosexual gene dominate or recessive?</strong>
Justice Machine: Since you are looking for specific genetic information regarding your query, I am going to transfer this thread to the Science and Skepticism Forum.
Linda is offline  
Old 12-06-2002, 09:55 PM   #17
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: WA state
Posts: 261
Post

JusticeMachine, I get the impression you are playing a little game. Trying to set people up to say what you want so you can say "Aha!!" and then present your clever little conclusion.


Quote:
Originally posted by JusticeMachine:
<strong>
....I will start there and we can progress toward a conculsion.

Thanks, Rick</strong>
Why not begin with your point.
Then people can comment on it.

Or at least, answer this:

How do you feel about homosexuality?
xstvn is offline  
Old 12-06-2002, 10:52 PM   #18
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 403
Talking

My own personal views....hhmmm.

I have had friends who are homosexual, and they fear being defined. If ask how they became homosexual, they say they just are.

My ideas are on many fronts, in hope to come to a logical conclusion.

If we are just products of our enviroment and genetics and upbring then we can isolate how someone progressed into homosexuality.

If we are beings with free will, then homosexuality is a decision.

I fairly sure it is a combination of both of those premises.

If we can come to an agreement that there is a cause for it, then we can descide what bennifits or detremits there are inherent to it.

I ask earlier if it is a natural state of being, or rather is there a natural state of being, a norm if you will, that exists. Specifically in being human.

Nature (or GOD depending on what you believe) has set our bodies and minds up, in general for procreation. The sexual organs work very well together towards that end. The way the female body is stronger in areas to bear children, the way females can bear the pain of labor in giving birth, where as the male body would have great difficulty in this.

I also contend that (again speaking in generalities) that we are mentally set up for breading as well. We tend to gravitate towards family grouping for shared resources and protection. Our psychological make up pushes us toward that end. Even homosexuals use the fraise "in the family" or "family orientated" to describe being gay.

My personal beliefs will remain just that, as it is difficult to have productive debate if your/my feeling taint my thinking.
JusticeMachine is offline  
Old 12-07-2002, 03:30 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Land of Make Believe
Posts: 781
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by JusticeMachine:
<strong>My own personal views....hhmmm.

I have had friends who are homosexual, and they fear being defined. If ask how they became homosexual, they say they just are.

My ideas are on many fronts, in hope to come to a logical conclusion.

If we are just products of our enviroment and genetics and upbring then we can isolate how someone progressed into homosexuality.

If we are beings with free will, then homosexuality is a decision.

I fairly sure it is a combination of both of those premises.</strong>
I agree that it's a combination of both premises. I have this suspicion that you might be driving to the point that since free will is involved, you think homosexuals can change into heterosexuals. Is this correct?

I would tend to disagree because it seems that even though we have some measure of free will, it doesn't mean we're able to change many things about ourselves especially when it comes to sexuality. Your friends answer to the question about how they became homosexual is a perfect example. They developed this way and it has seemed natural to them. They probably never think about it in terms of making a decision to be homosexual. It's how they developed and to them it's as natural as how a heterosexual develops.

Quote:
<strong>If we can come to an agreement that there is a cause for it, then we can descide what bennifits or detremits there are inherent to it.</strong>
The benefits or detriments for whom?

Quote:
<strong>I ask earlier if it is a natural state of being, or rather is there a natural state of being, a norm if you will, that exists. Specifically in being human.

Nature (or GOD depending on what you believe) has set our bodies and minds up, in general for procreation. The sexual organs work very well together towards that end. The way the female body is stronger in areas to bear children, the way females can bear the pain of labor in giving birth, where as the male body would have great difficulty in this.

I also contend that (again speaking in generalities) that we are mentally set up for breading as well. We tend to gravitate towards family grouping for shared resources and protection. Our psychological make up pushes us toward that end. Even homosexuals use the fraise "in the family" or "family orientated" to describe being gay.

My personal beliefs will remain just that, as it is difficult to have productive debate if your/my feeling taint my thinking.</strong>
What is the definition of the "natural state of being"? IMO, the definition for the natural state of being would vary widely between people. I think you could make some general statements about the natural state of being (which you've done)but it stops there. Nature is very diverse.
motorhead is offline  
Old 12-07-2002, 05:10 AM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cleveland, OH, USA Folding@Home Godless Team
Posts: 6,211
Post

I think the 'norm' for nature is diversity.
sakrilege is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:03 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.