Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-20-2002, 06:22 PM | #171 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 1,309
|
Quote:
If God can create Good without Bad, but chooses not to do so, then God is not benevolent. Jeff [ April 20, 2002: Message edited by: Not Prince Hamlet ]</p> |
|
04-20-2002, 06:24 PM | #172 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: On Mission
Posts: 50
|
Quote:
|
|
04-20-2002, 06:26 PM | #173 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 278
|
I cannot imagine anyone ever choosing to go to hell. It is inconcievable. How does someone go about deliberately wanting to spend eternity in such a place?
Why do you believe in hell? I have never seen a shred of good evidence for such a place, so I don't believe in it (same as the sky daddy myth) |
04-20-2002, 06:29 PM | #174 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: On Mission
Posts: 50
|
Jeff,
Your constant circular logic is intriguing, does more depth exist or is what I see what I get? Oh and I believe intrinsic does not end in a "t" |
04-20-2002, 06:31 PM | #175 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 1,309
|
Booty,
Interesting hyperbole on your part. Please demonstrate how my reasoning was circular. I'm sure we'd all love to see that. Jeff [ April 20, 2002: Message edited by: Not Prince Hamlet ]</p> |
04-20-2002, 06:33 PM | #176 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: On Mission
Posts: 50
|
Quote:
|
|
04-20-2002, 06:34 PM | #177 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 2,936
|
Quote:
|
|
04-20-2002, 06:34 PM | #178 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 1,309
|
Quote:
LOL! Just to give you the background, Booty, we've observed that when theists have come here to convert and have found that they have no valid arguments nor counters to the valid arguments of the atheists, sooner or later they always fall back to attacking spelling errors. You made it further than most, at least. It was 7 pages before you did it. Jeff [ April 20, 2002: Message edited by: Not Prince Hamlet ]</p> |
|
04-20-2002, 06:35 PM | #179 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: On Mission
Posts: 50
|
Quote:
|
|
04-20-2002, 06:36 PM | #180 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 278
|
"If God is omnipotent, then he can create Good without Bad.
If God can create Good without Bad, but chooses not to do so, then God is not benevolent." He begins with a premise, If A --> B. Therefore If B -->C. That is not the prepostional form of the classical circular argument. The classic circular argument is: God exists because it says so in the bible. The bible is true because god wrote it or If A --> B, therefore B---> A, the classic Christian circle. EDIT: Well, I'm not choosing to go either. So what's the problem? [ April 20, 2002: Message edited by: Seeker196 ]</p> |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|