FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-24-2002, 04:43 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: A city in Florida that I love
Posts: 3,416
Cool Harwood's wager

<a href="http://www.philosophers.co.uk/portal_article.php?id=26" target="_blank">In Praise of Zeus</a>

Hard to say how this paper should be taken, but my fellow Reconstructionist Pagans like it. Mediterreanean paganism can compete with Christianity in most arenas (makes me wonder why we lost ), and divine wagering is one of them. Enjoy!
Ojuice5001 is offline  
Old 08-18-2002, 11:06 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: A city in Florida that I love
Posts: 3,416
Post

Inspired by Tercel's Pascal's Wager thread, I am bumping this thread up. I have to wonder why Tercel's thread got 22 replies in its pre-RRP stage alone, and mine didn't get any. Is it because Roman paganism is safely marginalized, and Christianity is less so? Is it because no one bothered to follow the link? Is it because this wager is actually far superior to the Christian wager? Send it to RRP (or elsewhere) if you must, but try not to let it go unanswered this time.
Ojuice5001 is offline  
Old 08-18-2002, 11:13 AM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Talking

It was because the article was 1) a good parody of Pascal's wager and 2) so good that no reply was needed.

I guess I need to get off this computer and go worship a tree for a while. See ya.
Toto is offline  
Old 08-18-2002, 02:43 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: On a sailing ship to nowhere, leaving any place
Posts: 2,254
Cool

Zeuss is mah daddy!
Demigawd is offline  
Old 08-18-2002, 04:55 PM   #5
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Burlington, Vermont, USA
Posts: 177
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Ojuice5001:
<strong><a href="http://www.philosophers.co.uk/portal_article.php?id=26" target="_blank">In Praise of Zeus</a>

Hard to say how this paper should be taken, but my fellow Reconstructionist Pagans like it. Mediterreanean paganism can compete with Christianity in most arenas (makes me wonder why we lost ), and divine wagering is one of them. Enjoy!</strong>

I think the Homeric gods lost out (Homer himself didn't appear to take them very seriously) because they didn't have a book to mix up plausible real history with the mythology. Bertrand Russell makes this point very strongly in his History of Western Philosophy.

Most people seem to be unaware that the Greek gods really did heal illnesses, just as Christ is said to have done. At Epidaurus there are monuments with inscriptions from the grateful beneficiaries of the ministrations of Asklepios.
RogerLeeCooke is offline  
Old 08-18-2002, 05:30 PM   #6
lcb
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: washington d.c.
Posts: 224
Post

bbbbbbECAUSE Game theory Risk Averse Lorenz strategy is a threat to the smug atheist coven and your theory isnt! so they removed it! they arent afraid of yours....
lcb is offline  
Old 08-18-2002, 05:46 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: A city in Florida that I love
Posts: 3,416
Wink

I know. It is my hope that I can create a strategy that really will halt the rising tides of atheism, and return the world to a proper worship of Jupiter and friends. And it must be done without the use of force too. Such a strategy exists, but Harwood's wager isn't it.
Ojuice5001 is offline  
Old 08-18-2002, 06:09 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Metropolis
Posts: 916
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Ojuice5001:
<strong>Inspired by Tercel's Pascal's Wager thread, I am bumping this thread up. I have to wonder why Tercel's thread got 22 replies in its pre-RRP stage alone, and mine didn't get any. Is it because Roman paganism is safely marginalized, and Christianity is less so? Is it because no one bothered to follow the link? Is it because this wager is actually far superior to the Christian wager? Send it to RRP (or elsewhere) if you must, but try not to let it go unanswered this time.</strong>
Well, you posted it before I took up the moderator hat here again, for one thing

I'm not inclined to move it now because I think discussions of why Pascal's Wager is a pile of crap (even when it's called "game theory") is a legit topic for this forum.

But, ironically, Pascal's Wager itself is such a tired cliche' of an argument that I'd prefer not to muddy the waters in a serious forum. So off to RRP.

However, if this thread becomes a discussion of why it's not in RRP instead of the actual article, it might as well get moved.
phlebas is offline  
Old 08-18-2002, 06:42 PM   #9
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: somewhere in Canada
Posts: 188
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by lcb:
bbbbbbECAUSE Game theory Risk Averse Lorenz strategy is a threat to the smug atheist coven and your theory isnt! so they removed it! they arent afraid of yours....
This *is* a joke. Please? ;p
randomsyllable is offline  
Old 08-18-2002, 09:04 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4,656
Question

Quote:
Originally posted by Toto:
<strong>
I guess I need to get off this computer and go worship a tree for a while. See ya.</strong>
Huh? Yer makin' an allusion to sumpin'? <img src="confused.gif" border="0">
Heathen Dawn is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:16 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.