Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-19-2002, 03:18 PM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Darwin
Posts: 1,466
|
If God exists, then why is he hiding?
If God exists then why is he hiding?.
If there are any theists out their can they explain why there are so many people how doubt his existence and as for those theists; why is there so many versions of him? Some believe that he is up in his remote Heaven and we are down hear on Earth. Others argue he is everywhere from the most remote parts of the Universe to Uncle Bob's chicken coup. And when they say God created us in his image, does this have anything to do with his physical appearance? Is he gender specific? and if so does he have male genitals and why would he need them? I feel is we narrowed our definition of God like we narrow the definition of Queen Elizabeth II then theists would be very few and far between. At least we know where Buckingham Palace is and as such have a fair idea where she may hiding crocodile deathroll |
03-19-2002, 03:48 PM | #2 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 7,735
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
[Edited by Samhain because of typos.] [ March 19, 2002: Message edited by: Samhain ]</p> |
|||
03-19-2002, 05:00 PM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: India
Posts: 6,977
|
This is a very easy question. God is afraid of what the infidels here would do to him if they got their hands on him; so he is hiding and hiding very well.
|
03-19-2002, 06:04 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fargo, ND, USA
Posts: 1,849
|
crocodile deathtroll,
This is an excellent question. Of course, the most likely theist response will be something along the lines of "God isn't hiding from you, you're hiding from him." Of course, it's completely unproven--hey, you didn't expect me to prove the above "assertion," did ya? That's the theists' job. Sincerely, Goliath |
03-19-2002, 08:38 PM | #5 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
|
A related question is: where have all the miracles gone? Before recent centuries, there were numerous reports of miracles; but David Hume noted 250 years ago that miracles are not as common as they used to be. A conclusion which is still true today.
Consider the miracles that many medieval saints had supposedly performed, and consider how the Vatican has to scrape the bottom of the barrel for miracles to attribute to recent would-be saints. |
03-19-2002, 08:45 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Redmond, Wa
Posts: 937
|
God hiding? Shame, perhaps?
Lack of miracles? Asimov's law. |
03-22-2002, 02:26 PM | #7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Darwin
Posts: 1,466
|
Well I do no cancer exists and you cannot hide from that. I do not like cancer, theist and atheists alike do not like cancer. But simply because you do not like it, is not a good reason to deny its existance.
I like to hide from cancer as much as possible eg by not smoking or handling radioactive materials. I can see no advantage in not hiding from this so called God, as cancer cannot tell the difference between an thiest or an athiest. Quote:
|
|
03-22-2002, 03:50 PM | #8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,562
|
Quote:
Similarly Jesus performed all sorts of miracles. Later his disciples inherited some of this power and also performed miracles. By the time the church became politically significant noone would think of asking the clergy to perform miracles to show that they were truly the disciples of Jesus. |
|
03-22-2002, 03:56 PM | #9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Darwin
Posts: 1,466
|
Quote:
|
|
03-22-2002, 06:28 PM | #10 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Planet Lovetron
Posts: 3,919
|
"If God exists, why is He hiding?"
I posted this on a different thread, but here is my guess: I tend to believe in a God who only values our decision to love Him if it is made freely. As such, I do not believe that God would coerce us into believing in Him even by leaving proof of his existence. In order to freely love and honor an omnipotent, omnipresent being, you would need the OPTION of not believing in him. Because if you really had direct knowledge of an omnipresent or omniscient God you would have no freedom to choose to love him or not. His very presence would be co-ercive. In a way, the very fact that he allows you sufficient grounds to be an atheist is part of His love for you. My basic theory is that there would be no observable difference in a universe created by an omnipotent God who desired the free love of his creatures and a universe formed by chance. God would have to leave the option open for it to at least look like chance in order for us to make free choices uncontstrained by His power. In short, I believe in a God who covers his tracks. This, by the way, is why you must know God by faith, and not knowledge. Knowledge would eliminate choice. It would take no virtue to obey an omniscient, ominipotent, and omnipresent Deity if you could SEE him, it would only take an instinct for self-preservation. Real, freely-given worship is not even POSSIBLE unless there is some element of doubt of God's existence. "Course that's just my opinion, I could be wrong." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|