Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-10-2003, 01:49 AM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 215
|
xenotransplants
Can baboon organs have less chance of rejection than EVEN human organs? According to this usenet post, then answer seems to be yes.
http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&...3Dtalk.origins Something seems wrong. Wouldn't good baboon-human match be a rarity? And how come the rejections for baboon to human tranplants are almost alway more acute than human to human transplants? Or am I wrong? Or is Wade trying to mess with my mind? |
02-10-2003, 01:59 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,504
|
Hi,
I don't know if it is true or not, but the basic idea that is being put forward seems to be that: There is genetic variation in the MHC gene in humans (there are differences between humans in the MHC gene). Some humans are only a little different from each other in this gene, others are very different. On average, the difference in this gene between a human and a chimpanzee or a baboon would be greater than that between humans, but the maximum difference between two humans might be less than the minimum difference between a human and a chimpanzee or a baboon. Even if this is true, I would expect it to be easier to find a human-chimpanzee match than a human-baboon match. If variation in the MHC gene could be quantified in one dimension, it might be something like: human MHC: 1000-1100 chimpanzee MHC: 1150-1250 baboon MHC: 825-925 maximum human-human difference: 100 minumum human-chimpanzee difference: 50 minimum himan-baboon difference: 75 Hope this helps. Peez |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|