Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-27-2002, 01:15 PM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,162
|
Editorial: Creationism doesn't belong in biology class
This <a href="http://www.dispatch.com/editorials-story.php?story=dispatch/news/editorials02/jan02/1043826.html" target="_blank">editorial</a> appeared in the Columbus(Ohio) Dispatchthis week.
This of course drew out the cretinists: <a href="http://www.dispatch.com/editorials-story.php?story=dispatch/news/editorials02/jan02/1047608.html" target="_blank">Evolution isn't fare for classroom, either</a> <a href="http://www.dispatch.com/editorials-story.php?story=dispatch/news/editorials02/jan02/1052414.html" target="_blank">Intelligent design merits equal time</a> <a href="http://www.dispatch.com/editorials-story.php?story=dispatch/news/editorials02/jan02/1052415.html" target="_blank">Religion, science must be separate</a> <a href="http://www.dispatch.com/editorials-story.php?story=dispatch/news/editorials02/jan02/1054349.html" target="_blank">Intelligent design unjustly kept from schoolchildren</a> <img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" /> [ January 27, 2002: Message edited by: zetek ]</p> |
01-27-2002, 02:26 PM | #2 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 498
|
I clicked on "Evolution isn't fare for classroom, either" and this came to my eyes:
Quote:
- Prince Ashitaka - [ January 27, 2002: Message edited by: Prince Ashitaka ]</p> |
|
01-27-2002, 07:58 PM | #3 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: land of confusion
Posts: 178
|
How about the link saying that science and religion must be separate?
The guy talks about no evidence for the "origin of life" in conjunction with evolutionary theory. He puts a "Dr." in front of his name. I certainly hope he is not a biologist. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|