FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-27-2002, 01:15 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,162
Post Editorial: Creationism doesn't belong in biology class

This <a href="http://www.dispatch.com/editorials-story.php?story=dispatch/news/editorials02/jan02/1043826.html" target="_blank">editorial</a> appeared in the Columbus(Ohio) Dispatchthis week.

This of course drew out the cretinists:

<a href="http://www.dispatch.com/editorials-story.php?story=dispatch/news/editorials02/jan02/1047608.html" target="_blank">Evolution isn't fare for classroom, either</a>

<a href="http://www.dispatch.com/editorials-story.php?story=dispatch/news/editorials02/jan02/1052414.html" target="_blank">Intelligent design merits equal time</a>

<a href="http://www.dispatch.com/editorials-story.php?story=dispatch/news/editorials02/jan02/1052415.html" target="_blank">Religion, science must be separate</a>

<a href="http://www.dispatch.com/editorials-story.php?story=dispatch/news/editorials02/jan02/1054349.html" target="_blank">Intelligent design unjustly kept from schoolchildren</a>

<img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" />

[ January 27, 2002: Message edited by: zetek ]</p>
Blinn is offline  
Old 01-27-2002, 02:26 PM   #2
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 498
Thumbs up

I clicked on "Evolution isn't fare for classroom, either" and this came to my eyes:

Quote:
In order for scientists to maintain that something has been proved, it must be observable and repeatable. If it is neither, it remains a hypothesis. Creation science and evolution have adherents within the scientific community. More tend to embrace evolution, but that does not negate possibilities espoused by scientists who reject evolution.
First off, they demonstrate a misunderstanding of science by stating that because evolution isn't proven it is a hypothesis. Then they go on to state that unless 100% of the scientific community believes in something, then it is just a "world view." But shall we not teach that the Earth is a sphere either? And that it rotates around the sun? We have not proven that these things are true (we only have empirical evidence to back them up), and not 100% of scientists agree with it. (Yes, there are still a few nutcase scientists out there.) Therefore, we should not teach about Copernicus's and Galileo's "world view." <img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" />

- Prince Ashitaka -

[ January 27, 2002: Message edited by: Prince Ashitaka ]</p>
Prince Ashitaka is offline  
Old 01-27-2002, 07:58 PM   #3
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: land of confusion
Posts: 178
Post

How about the link saying that science and religion must be separate?

The guy talks about no evidence for the "origin of life" in conjunction with evolutionary theory.

He puts a "Dr." in front of his name.

I certainly hope he is not a biologist.
pseudobug is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:36 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.