Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
12-05-2002, 04:44 PM | #21 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 1,537
|
Allright. Excuses! Excuses!
Why many theologians loves "ad hoc" as they also failed to realise I can use "ad hoc" to justify other religions as well?! Or easiest, "ad hominem"...examples: God is worthy of worship because, among many reasons, He is morally perfect. His character is the standard by which our characters are judged. Now, you are objecting to these various passages because apparently you think that they show God doing something which is immoral, and hence He is not worthy of being worshipped as morally perfect. But, how do you say this? By what standard are you presuming to judge God's character? You object to the idea that the Creator of all that is should dictate what it is to be good, and that He should do things which are hard for us to understand. But then you turn around and want to dictate to God what is good. Only you are not the Creator of all that is. another: Me; In what consequence do I say if I say I can be better than God in a way that I can be more humane than Him? What more complicated answers do you want? So, my questioning of God's morality leads to what? That if I took God's place, God's decision will still reign ultimate and that my decisions are all fallible? How can any of us possibly be better than God? Do we have the power to create any universes or life forms just by speaking the words? If you, or anyone, took Gods place the entire world would suck, because we as humans aren’t without sin, and God is. And to prove that, this writer has to write a friggin long essay explaining why jehovah did a much better job than Krishna or Allah (Islam). and here's a delusional defense of salvation based on faith compared to salvation based on character: How is it absurd that you would need something more than good deeds to get into Heaven? So then, according to Hinduism, and Islam, if you were to donate millions of dollars to help the needy every year for 20 years or so, and then you kill someone, and happen to die, where do you go? Why would a murderer deserve to go to Heaven? Why would someone that has done so much good deserve to go anywhere else but Heaven? ME: Again, I can kill 10 people, believe in Jesus and be atoned. Isn't it so with present Protestant doctrine? According to Romans 10:9-10 you have to believe in your heart, and confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord, and then you will be saved. When you get saved you "become a new creature in Christ Jesus," thus all of your previous sins are forgiven, and you are given a second try, no matter what you have done in the past, because you are now a new creature. Some people hate that, but that’s the way it is. I personally think that it is great. If we were to gain entrance to heaven by our deeds, then all of us would go to hell. Since there is faith, you can mess up, and still make it to heaven. In this case, this apologist thought salvation based on character means that a mass murderer can get away from retribution by donating sums to the charity. Isn't it similar to grace offered by jesus? I feel sorry for them because religion drives them to be THAT .... whatever, dumb. |
12-05-2002, 05:39 PM | #22 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 15
|
Quote:
|
|
12-06-2002, 04:00 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Racine, Wi. USA
Posts: 768
|
Agapeo
Excuse me for shortening the context but I think it is sufficient for my purpose. <<<<you formulated what you believe to be true. >>>> I think you are mistaken. I did not formulate what I believed to be true. I rejected what I believed to be untrue. You see Agapeo, most skeptics have no trouble using a simple 4 word phrase that True Believers abhor. I'll bet that you can guess what I'm getting at as you seem to be an intelligent person. The phrase is "I do not know". The Admiral |
12-06-2002, 04:09 AM | #24 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ill
Posts: 6,577
|
Quote:
Here's a quote from my pastor's most recently published book: Quote:
|
||
12-06-2002, 05:17 AM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Racine, Wi. USA
Posts: 768
|
Helen
Consider the possibility that your pastor may not be a True Believer. I think there are many Atheists on the pulpit. The Admiral |
12-06-2002, 05:30 AM | #26 | ||||
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: OH
Posts: 376
|
Hi Admiral,
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
12-06-2002, 05:38 AM | #27 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ill
Posts: 6,577
|
Quote:
If he's an atheist he must be lying and very good at it...since he'd be asked to step down by all the other True Believers if he were not a True Believer (of course). In my best judgment, hearing him week after week, he totally believes what he says. Nevertheless he isn't afraid to say "I don't know". In fact that was one of the first things I noticed when I started attending my current church and it's one of the things I appreciate about it - that the senior pastor is quite willing to say "I don't know" in circumstances when other Christians would make the mistake of trying to give some answer - which wouldn't satisfy anyway and might trivialize the pain behind the question, moreover. Helen |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|