FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-27-2002, 09:44 AM   #241
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Twin Cities, USA
Posts: 3,197
Default

Amie: if a teacher is having a relationship with an adult student, then that is not against the law. It is perfectly all right for someone to have a relationship with someone 18 and older. That is the law. I believe it is also legal to have relations with - even marry - someone younger, as long as the parent is aware of the relationship.
Bree is offline  
Old 12-27-2002, 01:20 PM   #242
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,626
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Bree
Amie: if a teacher is having a relationship with an adult student, then that is not against the law. It is perfectly all right for someone to have a relationship with someone 18 and older. That is the law. I believe it is also legal to have relations with - even marry - someone younger, as long as the parent is aware of the relationship.
I agree that is not against the law. However she was not an adult when the relationship began. He was her high school teacher that is how they met. They married when she turned 18.
Amie is offline  
Old 12-27-2002, 01:30 PM   #243
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,626
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Talulah
It is only that when I hear of the massive scandals going on in the Catholic church and then I see that people send their vulnerable children to a school of the same entity, it makes me nervous, that is all. I still contend that a child would NOT have as much trouble telling their parents that a teacher did something to them as they would have if she same thing happened with a priest or 'sister.' It is the religion thing
I have a friend who told me they feel that ths problem is worse within the church because these are suppose to be "holy" men and the children should feel safe with them. I think what they did was morally repugnant however that does not mean that parents should not send their child to catholic schools.

Those men need to be removed, stripped of titles and thrown in jail. Not put on sabbatical. The fact that some of those priests were merely transferred has people wondering about ALL priests and it is unfortunate that the bad ones ruin it for the good ones...
Amie is offline  
Old 12-27-2002, 02:04 PM   #244
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Washington the state
Posts: 406
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Infinity Lover
Okay, now I'm gonna misspell your name Debby... on principle!
Nah, just goofing.

As someone who's been an atheist his entire life, and has no personal attachment to any church, I was just as puzzled by what this elusive "secular world" you were referring to exactly was. (And still am somewhat to be honest)

It might be tempting to flip out the "feeling defensive about your church" card, but does one really have to be Roman Catholic to zoom out, and look at the broader picture?

When it comes to pedophilia, it's definately open to debate how well the authorities handle things in general. Known offenders set loose after doing their time only to turn into repeat offenders. The obligation to defend and inform the public on the one hand, not making the names faces and locations of pedophiles public, to avoid undesirable vigilanty actions on the other...

If a thread that tends to present a problem as yet another example of what's wrong with a particular organization, while it is really about a specific manifestation of a problem that is present throughout the whole of society (thus unavoidably within said organization as well), and it might be wiser to treat it as such, pointing that out is hardly off topic t.m.h.o., or nessecarily biased for that matter.
I will clarify for you that what I mean by secular would be like our government and schools which is supposed to be seperated from the church. This also would include organizations that are not church affiliated. A good example of some programs that are being done is (at least in my region) is schools teaching children about abuse and how to prevent it and know what it is. Example: the difference between good touches and bad touches and who to contact if the child is being abused. They are told to go to a teacher or principle or another trusted adult.

The problem with the church in Boston is children did come forward and none of the ones in charge in the church did anything about it. Families were even ostracized because of it. And the abuse continued and even more children were abused because no one wanted to deal with the problem. If this had happened in a public school the law at least in my state would hold any administrator accountable if they had done what the Cardinal did.

When I read that the Catholic church makes decisions to not turn these men over to the law bothers me greatly that the church can make decisions that they shouldn't be allowed to do. Harboring a pedophile and not allowing justice to happen does nothing to help the problem of child abuse. I would think it safe to say that a pedophile priest would be safest to abuse in the church knowing the protection they will recieve. When this happens in the secular world believe me I am protesting just as loud. I will not however say "well it also happens in the church". It doesn't make what happened any less dirty if I can point out 100 other areas it is happening in. If it was an organzation that I was involved in I would be in there like a Jesus character toppling the tables of the abusers. I am one that does work to help stop abuse on a volunteer basis. It has helped my own healing process to be doing something positive to help children. And one thing I have learned is that denial of what is happening in our own backyards does not help children. In this case of the Catholic church, members need to stop being so defensive about the church and start doing something positive to stop it from happening again in the church. This goes for any other organization.
Debbie T is offline  
Old 12-27-2002, 02:11 PM   #245
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Washington the state
Posts: 406
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Amie
I agree that is not against the law. However she was not an adult when the relationship began. He was her high school teacher that is how they met. They married when she turned 18.
I do agree this was not right. What I don't see in this story is a huge organization covering up the story and protecting this man. I hope the original school is being dealt with and hopefully the school officials have learned not to let this happen again. And the man was brought to justice in the end without the school making decisions outside the law to move him elsewhere.
Debbie T is offline  
Old 12-27-2002, 02:24 PM   #246
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Beautiful Colorado
Posts: 682
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Debbie T
I do agree this was not right. What I don't see in this story is a huge organization covering up the story and protecting this man. I hope the original school is being dealt with and hopefully the school officials have learned not to let this happen again. And the man was brought to justice in the end without the school making decisions outside the law to move him elsewhere.
I don't feel comfortable condemning the situation without knowing particulars. How old was the man? How did they meet? Under what circumstances did they see each other? Were her parents aware? Were there extenuating circumstances like pregnancy?

The fact that they got married when she turned 18 suggests to me that this has nothing to do with child abuse or molestation. I well remember when I was in high school a senior girl slept with the 24 year old soccer coach and the scandal resulting from it. He got fired and deported back to Ireland if I remember correctly. Stupid and ill-advised, sure but it isn't criminal imo, in THAT situation, from what I know of it.

I don't like people using this as 'proof' that child abuse occurs in schools.
Talulah is offline  
Old 12-27-2002, 02:36 PM   #247
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,626
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Debbie T
A good example of some programs that are being done is (at least in my region) is schools teaching children about abuse and how to prevent it and know what it is. Example: the difference between good touches and bad touches and who to contact if the child is being abused. They are told to go to a teacher or principle or another trusted adult.
They did that at my school too and I went to Catholic school all my life.

Quote:
The problem with the church in Boston is children did come forward and none of the ones in charge in the church did anything about it. Families were even ostracized because of it. And the abuse continued and even more children were abused because no one wanted to deal with the problem. If this had happened in a public school the law at least in my state would hold any administrator accountable if they had done what the Cardinal did.
I agree it was handled completely inappropriately.
Amie is offline  
Old 12-30-2002, 08:46 AM   #248
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: North of Boston
Posts: 1,392
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Gemma Therese
Sullster,

Since when are you the moral authority of the Catholic Church?

Gemma Therese
I have been away for a few days and I come back to read this reaction to my posting that child-raping priests should be treated the same as any other child-raper in the civil courts.

First off, your reaction here is just over defensiveness which implies that you can not think rationally about this issue. I personally have not claimed any moral authority over this organization you call the catholic church. I am stating
my agreement with the laws of my society, which have determined that child-rape is a crime punishable by a jail term. A priest is subject to the laws of society.

Finally, I am disturbed and appalled that you, a nun in a religion which for centuries has made people fear eternal punishments for all types of thought and actions, feels that she must defend and cover over the sexual crimes of priests.

I am convinced that the catholic church is an institution which stands for nothing but its own perpetuation. It is hypocracy and nihilism and your views here on priestly child rape are an affirmation of my admittedly extreme view.
sullster is offline  
Old 12-30-2002, 08:59 AM   #249
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: new york
Posts: 608
Default

Sullster, I am not a nun.

For the record, all nuns are cloistered, and they have much better things to do with their time than debate on an on-line forum.

Gemma Therese
Gemma Therese is offline  
Old 12-30-2002, 09:03 AM   #250
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Sundsvall, Sweden
Posts: 3,159
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Gemma Therese
For the record, all nuns are cloistered, and they have much better things to do with their time than debate on an on-line forum.
Like what?
Eudaimonist is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:46 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.