FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-16-2002, 08:22 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Dunmanifestin, Discworld
Posts: 4,836
Post Powered exoskeleton

Check this out:
<a href="http://www.discover.com/feb_02/feattech.html" target="_blank">http://www.discover.com/feb_02/feattech.html</a>

They've been after this for years. Looks like it might become viable in the very near future. Energy storage seems to be a big limiting factor right now. Get that solved, and a few advances in material science for lighter-weight armor...
elwoodblues is offline  
Old 01-17-2002, 07:13 AM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: a place where i can list whatever location i want
Posts: 4,871
Talking

HAHAHA! Sweet! This means my mecha SF writings aren't totally absurd!

It'll only be a matter of time brfore you see <a href="http://www.gundamproject.com/mecha/gundamwing_leo.html" target="_blank">one of these</a> on the battlefield!
GunnerJ is offline  
Old 01-18-2002, 07:24 AM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: a place where i can list whatever location i want
Posts: 4,871
Unhappy

Um... doesn't anyone else have anything to say about this massively cool advancement?
GunnerJ is offline  
Old 01-18-2002, 10:20 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Greensboro, NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,597
Talking

Quote:
Originally posted by Rimstalker:
<strong>Um... doesn't anyone else have anything to say about this massively cool advancement?</strong>
Um...I'm not sure about the beam sabers and beam rifles, but even without the fantasy weapons, the advancement is indeed "massively cool."

The article also discussed, albeit briefly, non-military applications in construction, industry, and healthcare that are greatly appealing.

Thumbs up!

Bill
Bill Snedden is offline  
Old 01-18-2002, 12:18 PM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wilmington, Delaware
Posts: 320
Post

Very cool, I wonder if they can actually pull it off in their given time-frame. It seems to me that these things would be expensive as all hell, for a really long time. A shiny new Ferrari or a suit that would give you superhuman strength? Decisions, decisions...
Ism Schism. is offline  
Old 01-18-2002, 07:04 PM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: a place where i can list whatever location i want
Posts: 4,871
Cool

Quote:
Um...I'm not sure about the beam sabers and beam rifles,
Hey, just as long as we get to keep the Zero System. And Heat Rods. Good Athe, I want to see one of <a href="http://www.gundamproject.com/mecha/gundamwing_epyon.html" target="_blank">these</a>.

I hope these new advances don't entail <a href="http://www.gundamproject.com/chara/gundamwing_dorothy.html" target="_blank">creepy looking chicks with four eyebrows.</a>

If we actually got an infantry powered armor system up and running, what types of ramifications would this have for warfare? It doesn't seem like there'd be much enemy armies could do... it would take a lot of capital to produce these, so we'd be one of the only nations to have it. Seems like this would make opur army almost completely immune to small arms and conventional warfare.
GunnerJ is offline  
Old 01-18-2002, 08:33 PM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Rimstalker:
<strong>

Seems like this would make opur army almost completely immune to small arms and conventional warfare.</strong>
C'mon, Rimstalker. Remember the Stealth Bomber? Shot down one over Kosovo. What one human can make, another can unmake. Powered armor will have more achilles heels than a millipede. Someone will figure out a way to neutralize it.

Michael
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 01-19-2002, 08:35 AM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: a place where i can list whatever location i want
Posts: 4,871
Question

Quote:
C'mon, Rimstalker. Remember the Stealth Bomber? Shot down one over Kosovo.
Is this a common occurance?

Quote:
What one human can make, another can unmake. Powered armor will have more achilles heels than a millipede. Someone will figure out a way to neutralize it.
That was pretty much my point- what could neutralize it? How much money and technological ability would it take to do so on a consistant basis? How long would it take for them to catch up? How many armies in the world stand a chance against the American infantry as it is today? And how many of these would we actually be interested in fighting?

I don't doubt that there are answers here, I was just lookign for input as to what they could be. Since the American army is already pretty much the dominant infantry force in the world, it seems that having power-armored troops would only increase this power. (Of course, if this premise is based on a mythology of American invulnerability, then perhaps my argument needs quite a bit of tweaking... I may be seriously overestimating the ability of the American military.)
GunnerJ is offline  
Old 01-19-2002, 09:54 AM   #9
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by turtonm:
<strong>

(Rimstalker: Seems like this would make opur army almost completely immune to small arms and conventional warfare.)

C'mon, Rimstalker. Remember the Stealth Bomber? Shot down one over Kosovo. What one human can make, another can unmake. Powered armor will have more achilles heels than a millipede. Someone will figure out a way to neutralize it.

Michael</strong>
Here's an easy one: antitank weaponry.

What can make a hole in tank armor can make a hole in a powered-armor suit.

Also, a big enough explosion can cause a nasty kick.

The power-supply question is an interesting one. Batteries have the problem of very-low usable-energy density compared to fuels that are burned. So one would have to use either a miniature combustion engine or a fuel cell.
lpetrich is offline  
Old 01-20-2002, 08:21 AM   #10
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: a place where i can list whatever location i want
Posts: 4,871
Post

Quote:
Here's an easy one: antitank weaponry.

What can make a hole in tank armor can make a hole in a powered-armor suit.
A tank would be a much larger target and somewhat unmanuverable. A man in a powered suit would be a somewhat harder target to hit, due to increased manuverability and it being a smaller target.

I should clear something up, though: I'm not talking about individual suits here, that is, I'm not trying to imply that each powered infantryman would be indestructable. I'm talking about the overall effect of an army composed of power-armor troops. Sure, I don't doubt that rocket launchers could take out some of them, but a whole army, well trained, and strategically used would be the most formidible military force on the Earth.
GunnerJ is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:00 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.