pz

Warning! Jehovah's Witness's kitsch ahead!

Here we go, everyone can judge Eve's babeliciousness for themselves:



Eve is OK, but she seems to have a bit of a kink for animals.

Adam looks like he's straight from the set of some tacky 1970's era porn. Gay porn.

Oh, and the previously mentioned image:

Here, kitty, kitty...

Duvenoy

Thanks, pz.

As piles o' crap go, I'll score it a '7.9' for Art, '3.6' for Imagination, and a 'fell-off-bar-on-ass' for Natural History.

Aside from looking like she needs a bath, Eve ain't bad.

doov

Happy Wonderer

Eve and the giraffe seem to be having a good time...

I think we have some new source material for the photoshop competition.

HW

Anderson

I found this site on the net. It seems this book isn't the most honest publication to be released by the good folk at the Watchtower.

<a href="http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Academy/6040/ce01.htm" target="_blank">http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Academy/6040/ce01.htm</a>

beoba

Is this from experience?

Blinn

Yeah, it's that 18" tongue that she likes.

Bubba

Actually this causes a serious problem for Christianity because if I were Adam and Eve really did look that good I wouldn't do anything that might involve her having to wear clothes.

Bubba

Jan Haugland

Oh good grief. I'm glad you see the humour, folks, and I see it myself now.

I grew up in that sect, and that book was indeed what helped me leave, when I realised how utterely ignorant it was.

Back then I checked out the sources <a href="http://watchtower.observer.org/apps/pbcs.dll/article?Date=20020405&Category=DOCTRINE&ArtNo=1051 9027&Ref=AR" target="_blank">wrote a text debunking it</a>. This text is surely written from another perspective than I have now, but it points out quite a few of the misquotations and distortions.

Thanks for the memory...

Jesus Tap-Dancin' Christ

You mean they have honest publications?

Jan Haugland

This little book is pretty rare among JW publications in having complete citations for its (mis)quotations. Most JW publications just say things like "a famous scientist said" without any references. Considering the level of dishonesty they display when they do include references, one can only imagine when they don't.

A believer is not expected to go to a library and check out the sources. To even do that is an act of disobedience that no true believer would consider. Very blind faith, indeed.