Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-09-2002, 10:36 AM | #1 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
|
"Etz Hayim" (Tree of Life)
Quote:
(The New York Times requires free registration.) Since I came across this article at lucianne.com, I can't resist reproducing some of the reactions of the relentlessly paranoid "ldotters": Quote:
|
||
03-09-2002, 11:07 AM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
|
Incidentally, that's the first time I've ever heard the New York Times referred to as "Jew hating." Billy Graham, are you listening?
|
03-09-2002, 12:07 PM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 6,471
|
The United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism, which represents the 1.5 million Conservative Jews in the United States, has just issued a new Torah and commentary, the first for Conservatives in more than 60 years. Called "Etz Hayim" ("Tree of Life" in Hebrew), it offers an interpretation that incorporates the latest findings from archaeology, philology, anthropology and the study of ancient cultures. To the editors who worked on the book, it represents one of the boldest efforts ever to introduce into the religious mainstream a view of the Bible as a human rather than divine document.
The NYT has simply reported the news here, right? I consider the fact that the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism has argued that the Bible is a "human rather than divine document" news. Why is everybody shooting the messenger? Ignorance abounds. O the humanity! d |
03-09-2002, 04:46 PM | #4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
|
Quote:
I just thought it was appropriate, considering the invective levelled at some of the more "radical" (it seems they're becoming less and less radical every day) scholars by the conservatives that was unearthed in the other thread in this forum about the current Harper's article on the same subject. People get awfully touchy when their cherished myths are demolished, don't they? |
|
03-09-2002, 05:12 PM | #5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,777
|
Quote:
|
|
03-10-2002, 02:34 PM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: the 10th planet
Posts: 5,065
|
ooops
[ March 11, 2002: Message edited by: marduck ]</p> |
03-12-2002, 07:11 AM | #7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
|
Quote:
the utter lack of defense attempts by Christians. I would have at least exptected Nomad to come in here guns a blazin'. Seems like they've all had the rug pulled out from under them by the Jewish scholars... |
|
03-12-2002, 07:58 AM | #8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,777
|
Quote:
[ March 12, 2002: Message edited by: ReasonableDoubt ]</p> |
|
03-12-2002, 12:44 PM | #9 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Kosh: "What strikes me the most about this thread is the utter lack of defense attempts by Christians. I would have at least expected Nomad to come in here guns a blazin'."
Why should they? That would require some sort of moral integrity. "Seems like they've all had the rug pulled out from under them by the Jewish scholars... " Where are all the secular scholars? I guess we're not interested enough. Well, perhaps if I had $59 bucks to spare, but then I have other priorities in Jewish studies. (Any Jews have access to Seder Olam? or know where English versions of Mishnah or the Talmuds might be hiding on the net? -- I?ve actually found b.Berakhot, but nothing else.) |
03-12-2002, 02:11 PM | #10 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
|
Quote:
<img src="graemlins/notworthy.gif" border="0" alt="[Not Worthy]" /> |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|