Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-11-2002, 01:39 PM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: East of Dumbville, MA
Posts: 144
|
"First Synthetic Virus Created"
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_2122000/2122619.stm" target="_blank">http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_2122000/2122619.stm</a>
So, Is the "creation" of a Cell Next on the Block? |
07-11-2002, 01:43 PM | #2 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mount Aetna
Posts: 271
|
Damn, you beat me to it by a hairsbreadth!
Well, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_556000/556984.stm" target="_blank">here's</a> some more related stuff to chew on. .T. [ July 11, 2002: Message edited by: Typhon ]</p> |
07-11-2002, 01:48 PM | #3 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Fascinating and a bit scary at the same time. I don't take much comfort in "just a few people know how to do it" when it was done with a recipe downloaded off the Internet using mail-order components.
|
07-11-2002, 02:11 PM | #4 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: East of Dumbville, MA
Posts: 144
|
Quote:
Tabula_rasa |
|
07-11-2002, 04:01 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: 1162 easy freeway minutes from the new ICR in TX
Posts: 896
|
Quote:
Ahhh... this is what Dembski and Co. have been looking for -- proof that biological structures are intelligently designed! And it gets even better -- the "intelligent designer" has been identified as one Dr Eckard Wimmer. Kinda deflates the notion of a supernatural designer, though... |
|
07-12-2002, 02:34 AM | #6 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 473
|
why does the picture of that person not comfort me?
|
07-12-2002, 05:41 AM | #7 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: From:
Posts: 203
|
Quote:
Its a pity religion and "playing God" is holding us back though. |
|
07-12-2002, 08:43 AM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,886
|
The creationists would say that it is ironic that it takes us a lot of intelligence to design a virus yet "evolutionists" claim that life, which is much more complex, just "happened by chance".
|
07-12-2002, 11:39 AM | #9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Denver, Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,834
|
This is certainly a dramatic demonstration of the idea that the whole really is just the sum of the parts. A lot of the intuitive objection to abiogenesis is the belief that you need some extra "life force" on top of a lot of parts, to make life. The polio experiment shows that if you put the bits together in the proper order, you get life, no extras needed. It does not need a miracle or divine touch.
This is, of course, also a proof of principle. We've known for a long time that biology should in theory flow from the genetic code. But, this proves it rather dramatically. There are really no theoretical limits on this. One you've put the code to paper, it ought to be possible to reconstruct it in a new organism. |
07-12-2002, 03:58 PM | #10 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
ohwilleke,
On the contrary, some of the information inherent in an organism is the product of it's developmental environment. (Which includes organells, brownian motion, etc) The genetic code does not explicitly store all of this enviornmental data. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|