FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-31-2002, 10:31 AM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,234
Default Means to technological immortality

When we can adequately perform neuroregeneration upon humans, we will be in proximity to a breed of technological immortality. Also, if brain cells and tissue can be satisfactorily regenerated, and if brains can be transplanted, and if bodies can be cloned -- all ideas that do not seem to me unlikely to realise in the future -- mortality amongst mankind would be, practically speaking, a thing of the past. Imagine, at perhaps the age of 110 (for all we know), your organs begin to function incorrectly, and your body is altogether defective, or you have some sort of incurable virus, and your death seems to be just beyond the horizon. Imagine, I say, if you had a clone of yourself, grown to puperty and frozen, at your reach. Its brain could be removed, and your brain could be transplanted into its body.

The only tools necessary for technological immortality are the following: Neuroregeneration, human cloning, and brain transplantation (or body transplantation, depending on how you look at it). Each of which seems to me not that farfetched.

What are your opinions of the above means to immortality, or some other form of technological immortality?
Totalitarianist is offline  
Old 12-31-2002, 10:53 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 2,362
Default

Seems tragically immoral towards the poor clone. Essentially living its life for the purposes of dying in pubery to grant immortality to the person it was cloned from. But if a clone could be grown never having a brain, or only a very simple one, but with the connections all ready to support one, it isn't so ethically problematic.

I think that the prosepect of complete neurological immortality is the farthest-fetched notion in this scenario. If your brain tissue itself is diseased or daying of old age, then transplanting it to a new, younger body wouldn't make it live any longer. And it's hard to imagine developing a technology capable of keeping brain tissue youthful and disease-free forever, but not being able to do the same for the rest of the body.

The best bet, IMO, for technological immortality is to abandon human bodies completely. Figure out what it is about the brain that gives conciousness, and transfer that to a more long-lived medium, or one that it's easier to make back-ups of.

m.
Undercurrent is offline  
Old 12-31-2002, 01:43 PM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,234
Default

Quote:
I think that the prosepect of complete neurological immortality is the farthest-fetched notion in this scenario. If your brain tissue itself is diseased or daying of old age, then transplanting it to a new, younger body wouldn't make it live any longer. And it's hard to imagine developing a technology capable of keeping brain tissue youthful and disease-free forever, but not being able to do the same for the rest of the body.
To be certain, I never used the word "immortality" literally. Most deaths, even most deaths from old age, have nothing to do with the brain. Rather, the chief cause is usually a defect, whether caused by age or a disease, of an organ other than the brain. And perhaps diseases that relate to the brain can be cured in the future, and perhaps in the future brain tissue can be regenerated, and brain cells adequately regenerated. Put hormones, cryogenics, and brain transplantation into the equation, and we almost have immortality.

Quote:
The best bet, IMO, for technological immortality is to abandon human bodies completely. Figure out what it is about the brain that gives conciousness, and transfer that to a more long-lived medium, or one that it's easier to make back-ups of.
Not quite as realistic. At least brain transplantation, and of this I am assured by many neuroscientists and researchers, is in the realm of future possibility, in accordance with the rate at which we are presently progressing.
Totalitarianist is offline  
Old 12-31-2002, 01:45 PM   #4
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,234
Default

And the clone's "feelings" are irrelevant. The question is this: can we attain, by means of technology, something close to immortality?--that is the point of the present topic.
Totalitarianist is offline  
Old 12-31-2002, 01:52 PM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,234
Default

Imagine the possibilities! One could relive one's childhood, for aught we know!

Edit:

It is so fascinating that nothing could be more fascinating. And if it is beyond the limits of the technology available when one dies, remember cryogenics. If it will always remain impossible, we must endeavour nonetheless; for the scientific knowledge acquired would be immense.
Totalitarianist is offline  
Old 01-01-2003, 07:02 AM   #6
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: on the border between here and there, WV
Posts: 373
Talking

i agree, embodiment. it would be nice to live for as long as you wanted. but still, true immortality would get quite boring after a few thousand years.......
happyboy is offline  
Old 01-01-2003, 11:50 AM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tampa, Florida, U.S.
Posts: 95
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by happyboy
i agree, embodiment. it would be nice to live for as long as you wanted. but still, true immortality would get quite boring after a few thousand years.......
Why do you think that?
AtomSmasher is offline  
Old 01-01-2003, 02:20 PM   #8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: on the border between here and there, WV
Posts: 373
Smile

think about it, atomsmasher.....after a few thousand years, you've mastered every hobby you could possibly be interested in, exhausted every possible avenue of learning you cared to indulge in, and exhausted every pleasurable sensation to the point where they no longer satisfy.

i think after a few thousand years, let alone the millions of years true immortality would confront you with, you'd be pretty eager for an end of some kind.

happyboy
happyboy is offline  
Old 01-01-2003, 02:24 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 6,261
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Embodiment of The Absolute Idea
It is so fascinating that nothing could be more fascinating. And if it is beyond the limits of the technology available when one dies, remember cryogenics. If it will always remain impossible, we must endeavour nonetheless; for the scientific knowledge acquired would be immense.
Assuming that we achieve working cryogenics before brain transplant treatments such as you proposed, what makes you think that the future society that finally does find cure for cancer etc. will actually revive the millions in the freezer? Why bring that kind of burden onto themselves?
Jayjay is offline  
Old 01-01-2003, 02:54 PM   #10
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,234
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Jayjay
Assuming that we achieve working cryogenics before brain transplant treatments such as you proposed, what makes you think that the future society that finally does find cure for cancer etc. will actually revive the millions in the freezer? Why bring that kind of burden onto themselves?
That is a possibility.
Totalitarianist is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:25 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.