FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-30-2002, 05:28 PM   #81
Fire Jack
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I don't understand why this has been going on so long, all the fundy has to say is God did it.

Q:How did the ark stay together?
A:God did it.

Q:How did all those animals fit/stay alive/live afterwards/etc
A:God did it.

Q:Why did God flood the world when he could have simply killed the offenders, especially when it accomplished nothing since once the population grew evil came back.
A:Mysteries of God.

It's uselss to point out anything becuase fundy's can simply say god did it if no cheap excuses come to mind.
 
Old 11-30-2002, 05:36 PM   #82
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Eastern U.S.
Posts: 1,230
Post

Quote:
It's uselss to point out anything becuase fundy's can simply say god did it if no cheap excuses come to mind.
Oh, of course they will. But it's kind of fun to point out that there's absolutely no way that they can claim the Ark story could possibly be true without supernatural intervention.

An awful lot of "Creation Scientists" insist quite strenuously that the Ark story is utterly plausible -- that Noah could have built such a boat, that it would have been seaworthy, that he could have gathered all the animals and gotten them onto the boat, etc. etc.

There are a frighteningly large number of people who actually believe that the Noah's Ark story is a scientifically-plausible one. It's instructive to point out why such a thing could never have happened without divine intervention. It utterly destroys the claim that Creation "Science" is anything at all like real science.

Cheers,

Michael
The Lone Ranger is offline  
Old 11-30-2002, 06:37 PM   #83
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,956
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by The Lone Ranger:
<strong>

There are a frighteningly large number of people who actually believe that the Noah's Ark story is a scientifically-plausible one. It's instructive to point out why such a thing could never have happened without divine intervention. It utterly destroys the claim that Creation "Science" is anything at all like real science.

Michael</strong>
Really? Why don't those people try and create another 'ark'(including all the different species of animals and insects in the world) by using the modern technology to prove to everyone that such an ark was possible within a few years?
Answerer is offline  
Old 11-30-2002, 07:00 PM   #84
atheist_in_foxhole
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

The worst part of it is that the Republican party (the party that controls the presidency, Senate, House, and judiciary) is on the record supporting "equal time" for this creationinst crap. All it takes is a two vote shift on the Supreme Court and it will be legal to teach about Noah and the Flood in high school biology.

Sometimes I just hate this country. <img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" />
 
Old 11-30-2002, 08:15 PM   #85
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 473
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by atheist_in_foxhole:
<strong>The worst part of it is that the Republican party (the party that controls the presidency, Senate, House, and judiciary) is on the record supporting "equal time" for this creationinst crap. All it takes is a two vote shift on the Supreme Court and it will be legal to teach about Noah and the Flood in high school biology.

Sometimes I just hate this country. <img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" /> </strong>
*Would hate to see the US in 50 years*
Camaban is offline  
Old 11-30-2002, 09:36 PM   #86
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: US east coast. And www.theroyalforums.com
Posts: 2,829
Post

Quote:
But, as I recall, N threw a barbeque (don't ask me where he got the fire wood. Don't think it was the ark. Burning pitch kinda makes meat taste not so good)) for God. Perhaps Big G was grateful enough to lay a Shazam!! or two on him.
Is the sort of pitch that comes from pines sufficient to seal a boat like the ark? Cos bituminous pitch is one of those things that would have been laid down during the flood, so it wouldn't have been available as a building material.
Albion is offline  
Old 11-30-2002, 09:38 PM   #87
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: US east coast. And www.theroyalforums.com
Posts: 2,829
Post

Quote:
All it takes is a two vote shift on the Supreme Court and it will be legal to teach about Noah and the Flood in high school biology.
Well, I voiced that concern on another board, since I assumed that Thomas would have voted with Scalia and Rehnquist on Edwards v Aguillard if he'd been around, and I was told that he often votes against them on religious matters. So maybe they'll need three more? I suppose we can always hope.
Albion is offline  
Old 12-01-2002, 11:13 PM   #88
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ecuador
Posts: 738
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Albion:
<strong>

Is the sort of pitch that comes from pines sufficient to seal a boat like the ark? Cos bituminous pitch is one of those things that would have been laid down during the flood, so it wouldn't have been available as a building material.</strong>
Albion, I've thought about this problem (for about five minutes), and have solved the entire ark problem: rubber. Or rather, natural latex.

See, even Noah could figure out that there was no way a wooden boat would survive the coming Flud. So he got the Egyptians to trade with the Nubians to trade with southern tribes for latex. Picture it: thousands of camel caravans carrying barrels of latex from tropical forests to where Noah was building his boat. He coated everything with latex. During the Flud, when the termites and beavers ate through the wooden boat frame, all that was left was the latex coating. He and all his critters comfortably rode out the Flud waters in a giant Zodiac. Neatly solves the engineering problem, no?

I just wonder why the creationists couldn't come up with this one.
Quetzal is offline  
Old 12-02-2002, 02:09 AM   #89
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Just another hick from the sticks.
Posts: 1,108
Cool

Quote:
I just wonder why the creationists couldn't come up with this one.
The Bible failed to spell it out, and modern Creationists are not famous for original thinking (creative lying talents aside).

I think it probably was a conifer sap of some sort. Yes, and everybody and every thing lived shut up in a ship that reeked of flatulence, presperation, feces, vomit, rotting meat, and turpentine. It don't get no better than that, praise God!

doov

[ December 02, 2002: Message edited by: Duvenoy ]</p>
Duvenoy is offline  
Old 12-02-2002, 06:04 AM   #90
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
Post

Quote:
Or rather, natural latex.
A 300-cubit-long condom??
Coragyps is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:21 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.