Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-10-2002, 05:02 PM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Left of the Mississippi
Posts: 138
|
"...in the Year of our Lord"
In a recent letter to the editor in my local paper, someone mentioned the statement "in the Year of our Lord" in the Constitution as an endorsement of Christianity. How would you respond to that?
The most logical explanation is that it's simply the phrase of the time, no more than "God bless you" when one sneezes today. I've seen it in many writings from that era. It seems to me if we were intended to be a Christian nation, there'd be more references to "our Lord" than that. "Done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth. In Witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names." |
07-10-2002, 05:07 PM | #2 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 334
|
Quote:
To refute that claim, just look to the Treaty of Tripoli. |
|
07-10-2002, 05:09 PM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In a nondescript, black helicopter.
Posts: 6,637
|
The phrase "In the year of our lord" merely recognizes our adoption of the chrisitian calendar, which is in turn based on the Roman calendar, nothing more. It is important to note that many of the months of the year are all based upon Roman gods. Does this in turn mean that our founding fathers established this country with intention of worshipping the Roman gods? Or perhaps we should worship Norse gods as the days of the week are all based on Norse gods. Monday=Moonday, Thursday=Thor's day, etc.
[ July 10, 2002: Message edited by: braces_for_impact ]</p> |
07-10-2002, 05:15 PM | #4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 21
|
Strictly convention. It was the formal way to denote a date back then.
If using that phrase was meant to literally state that Jesus is our Lord, then using "Thursday" means Thor is our god of thunder and using "March" means Mars is our god of war, etc. |
07-10-2002, 05:16 PM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: ...
Posts: 2,191
|
The 365 day year with 12 months came from ancient Egypt. However, it was a year made up of 36 ten day weeks, with one weird five day week at the end of the year.
|
07-10-2002, 07:15 PM | #6 |
Beloved Deceased
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: central Florida
Posts: 3,546
|
<a href="http://astro.nmsu.edu/~lhuber/leaphist.html" target="_blank">http://astro.nmsu.edu/~lhuber/leaphist.html</a>
(Extract) What Dionysius did not do is establish an accurate date for the birth of Christ. Although scholars generally believe that Christ was born some years before A.D. 1, the historical evidence is too sketchy to allow a definitive dating. (End extract) |
07-10-2002, 08:29 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Rolla, Missouri
Posts: 830
|
It is a thrown around phrase and has no meaning to them but that this is what year it is, much like when someone says, "God bless you". God bless you is a comand to their god to cover you in blood in this case because they think your soul is escaping from your body(the air not in your body is made of satan), and covering you in blood should stop that(religious beleifs are funny ). In truth most of people are shocked at this explination of their phrase, and were only doing it because they were told it is the polite thing to do(ie the people that taught it to them don't know what it means either). Its a meaningless phrase.
|
07-10-2002, 10:40 PM | #8 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
On God Bless You:
Quote:
Nothing to do with god covering you with blood. Back to the original question: In our more secular and religiously inclusive era, "in the year of our Lord" (anno domini in Latin) has been replaced by "C.E." for common era. But I would still not attribute too much to the Founding Fathers' use of the term. They were not so radical that they tried to redesign the calendar. |
|
07-11-2002, 04:31 AM | #9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,107
|
They were not so radical that they tried to redesign the calendar.
...as did the French. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|